Commit 91fcdd4e authored by Borislav Petkov's avatar Borislav Petkov Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] readjust comments of task_timeslice for kernel doc

Signed-off-by: default avatarBorislav Petkov <petkov@math.uni-muenster.de>
Acked-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
parent 145fc655
......@@ -160,15 +160,6 @@
#define TASK_PREEMPTS_CURR(p, rq) \
((p)->prio < (rq)->curr->prio)
/*
* task_timeslice() scales user-nice values [ -20 ... 0 ... 19 ]
* to time slice values: [800ms ... 100ms ... 5ms]
*
* The higher a thread's priority, the bigger timeslices
* it gets during one round of execution. But even the lowest
* priority thread gets MIN_TIMESLICE worth of execution time.
*/
#define SCALE_PRIO(x, prio) \
max(x * (MAX_PRIO - prio) / (MAX_USER_PRIO / 2), MIN_TIMESLICE)
......@@ -180,6 +171,15 @@ static unsigned int static_prio_timeslice(int static_prio)
return SCALE_PRIO(DEF_TIMESLICE, static_prio);
}
/*
* task_timeslice() scales user-nice values [ -20 ... 0 ... 19 ]
* to time slice values: [800ms ... 100ms ... 5ms]
*
* The higher a thread's priority, the bigger timeslices
* it gets during one round of execution. But even the lowest
* priority thread gets MIN_TIMESLICE worth of execution time.
*/
static inline unsigned int task_timeslice(struct task_struct *p)
{
return static_prio_timeslice(p->static_prio);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment