Commit a1502132 authored by Daniel Borkmann's avatar Daniel Borkmann Committed by David S. Miller

bpf: fix up test cases with mixed signed/unsigned bounds

Fix the few existing test cases that used mixed signed/unsigned
bounds and switch them only to one flavor. Reason why we need this
is that proper boundaries cannot be derived from mixed tests.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent d6554904
...@@ -4969,7 +4969,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { ...@@ -4969,7 +4969,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2,
sizeof(struct test_val), 4), sizeof(struct test_val), 4),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0),
BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
...@@ -4995,7 +4995,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { ...@@ -4995,7 +4995,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2,
sizeof(struct test_val) + 1, 4), sizeof(struct test_val) + 1, 4),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0),
BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
...@@ -5023,7 +5023,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { ...@@ -5023,7 +5023,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2,
sizeof(struct test_val) - 20, 4), sizeof(struct test_val) - 20, 4),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0),
BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
...@@ -5050,7 +5050,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { ...@@ -5050,7 +5050,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_2,
sizeof(struct test_val) - 19, 4), sizeof(struct test_val) - 19, 4),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_4, 0),
BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2), BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGE, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_2, 2),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment