Commit aa9fc0c1 authored by Davidlohr Bueso's avatar Davidlohr Bueso Committed by Ingo Molnar

locking/mcs: Remove obsolete comment

... as we clearly inline mcs_spin_lock() now.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Acked-by: default avatarJason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: aswin@hp.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1406752916-3341-3-git-send-email-davidlohr@hp.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 42fa566b
...@@ -56,9 +56,6 @@ do { \ ...@@ -56,9 +56,6 @@ do { \
* If the lock has already been acquired, then this will proceed to spin * If the lock has already been acquired, then this will proceed to spin
* on this node->locked until the previous lock holder sets the node->locked * on this node->locked until the previous lock holder sets the node->locked
* in mcs_spin_unlock(). * in mcs_spin_unlock().
*
* We don't inline mcs_spin_lock() so that perf can correctly account for the
* time spent in this lock function.
*/ */
static inline static inline
void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node) void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment