Commit b806a71a authored by Rudolf Marek's avatar Rudolf Marek Committed by Jean Delvare

i2c-viapro: Add VX800/VX820 support

Thanks to new datasheets published on http://linux.via.com.tw we can now add 
support for VX800/VX820 chipsets.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRudolf Marek <r.marek@assembler.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
parent 4ad48e6a
...@@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ Supported adapters: ...@@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ Supported adapters:
* VIA Technologies, Inc. CX700 * VIA Technologies, Inc. CX700
Datasheet: available on request and under NDA from VIA Datasheet: available on request and under NDA from VIA
* VIA Technologies, Inc. VX800/VX820
Datasheet: available on http://linux.via.com.tw
Authors: Authors:
Kyösti Mälkki <kmalkki@cc.hut.fi>, Kyösti Mälkki <kmalkki@cc.hut.fi>,
Mark D. Studebaker <mdsxyz123@yahoo.com>, Mark D. Studebaker <mdsxyz123@yahoo.com>,
...@@ -49,6 +52,7 @@ Your lspci -n listing must show one of these : ...@@ -49,6 +52,7 @@ Your lspci -n listing must show one of these :
device 1106:3372 (VT8237S) device 1106:3372 (VT8237S)
device 1106:3287 (VT8251) device 1106:3287 (VT8251)
device 1106:8324 (CX700) device 1106:8324 (CX700)
device 1106:8353 (VX800/VX820)
If none of these show up, you should look in the BIOS for settings like If none of these show up, you should look in the BIOS for settings like
enable ACPI / SMBus or even USB. enable ACPI / SMBus or even USB.
...@@ -57,5 +61,5 @@ Except for the oldest chips (VT82C596A/B, VT82C686A and most probably ...@@ -57,5 +61,5 @@ Except for the oldest chips (VT82C596A/B, VT82C686A and most probably
VT8231), this driver supports I2C block transactions. Such transactions VT8231), this driver supports I2C block transactions. Such transactions
are mainly useful to read from and write to EEPROMs. are mainly useful to read from and write to EEPROMs.
The CX700 additionally appears to support SMBus PEC, although this driver The CX700/VX800/VX820 additionally appears to support SMBus PEC, although
doesn't implement it yet. this driver doesn't implement it yet.
...@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ config I2C_VIA ...@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ config I2C_VIA
will be called i2c-via. will be called i2c-via.
config I2C_VIAPRO config I2C_VIAPRO
tristate "VIA VT82C596/82C686/82xx and CX700" tristate "VIA VT82C596/82C686/82xx and CX700/VX800/VX820"
depends on PCI depends on PCI
help help
If you say yes to this option, support will be included for the VIA If you say yes to this option, support will be included for the VIA
...@@ -223,6 +223,8 @@ config I2C_VIAPRO ...@@ -223,6 +223,8 @@ config I2C_VIAPRO
VT8237R/A/S VT8237R/A/S
VT8251 VT8251
CX700 CX700
VX800
VX820
This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
will be called i2c-viapro. will be called i2c-viapro.
......
...@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ ...@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
VT8237S 0x3372 yes VT8237S 0x3372 yes
VT8251 0x3287 yes VT8251 0x3287 yes
CX700 0x8324 yes CX700 0x8324 yes
VX800/VX820 0x8353 yes
Note: we assume there can only be one device, with one SMBus interface. Note: we assume there can only be one device, with one SMBus interface.
*/ */
...@@ -396,6 +397,7 @@ static int __devinit vt596_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, ...@@ -396,6 +397,7 @@ static int __devinit vt596_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
switch (pdev->device) { switch (pdev->device) {
case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_CX700: case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_CX700:
case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_VX800:
case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8251: case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8251:
case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237: case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237:
case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237A: case PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237A:
...@@ -459,6 +461,8 @@ static struct pci_device_id vt596_ids[] = { ...@@ -459,6 +461,8 @@ static struct pci_device_id vt596_ids[] = {
.driver_data = SMBBA3 }, .driver_data = SMBBA3 },
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_CX700), { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_CX700),
.driver_data = SMBBA3 }, .driver_data = SMBBA3 },
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_VX800),
.driver_data = SMBBA3 },
{ 0, } { 0, }
}; };
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment