Commit b8dfc6a0 authored by Jean Delvare's avatar Jean Delvare Committed by David S. Miller

|PATCH] seeq: Add missing spinlock init

It doesn't seem this spinlock was properly initialized.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 979402b1
...@@ -751,6 +751,7 @@ static int __devinit sgiseeq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ...@@ -751,6 +751,7 @@ static int __devinit sgiseeq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
sp->srings = sr; sp->srings = sr;
sp->rx_desc = sp->srings->rxvector; sp->rx_desc = sp->srings->rxvector;
sp->tx_desc = sp->srings->txvector; sp->tx_desc = sp->srings->txvector;
spin_lock_init(&sp->tx_lock);
/* A couple calculations now, saves many cycles later. */ /* A couple calculations now, saves many cycles later. */
setup_rx_ring(dev, sp->rx_desc, SEEQ_RX_BUFFERS); setup_rx_ring(dev, sp->rx_desc, SEEQ_RX_BUFFERS);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment