Commit b91accaf authored by Lars-Peter Clausen's avatar Lars-Peter Clausen Committed by Jonathan Cameron

iio:event: Fix and cleanup locking

The event code currently holds a spinlock with IRQs disabled while calling
kfifo_to_user(). kfifo_to_user() can generate a page fault though, which means
we have to be able to sleep, which is not possible if the interrupts are
disabled. The good thing is that kfifo handles concurrent read and write access
just fine as long as there is only one reader and one writer, so we do not any
locking to protect against concurrent access from the read and writer thread. It
is possible though that userspace is trying to read from the event FIFO from
multiple concurrent threads, so we need to add locking to protect against this.
This is done using a mutex. The mutex will only protect the kfifo_to_user()
call, it will not protect the waitqueue. This means that multiple threads can be
waiting for new data and once a new event is added to the FIFO all waiting
threads will be woken up. If one of those threads is unable to read any data
(because another thread already read all the data) it will go back to sleep. The
only remaining issue is that now that the clearing of the BUSY flag and the
emptying of the FIFO does no longer happen in one atomic step it is possible
that a event is added to the FIFO after it has been emptied and this sample will
be visible the next time a new event file descriptor is created. To avoid this
rather move the emptying of the FIFO from iio_event_chrdev_release to
iio_event_getfd().
Signed-off-by: default avatarLars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
parent 93187840
......@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ struct iio_event_interface {
struct list_head dev_attr_list;
unsigned long flags;
struct attribute_group group;
struct mutex read_lock;
};
/**
......@@ -47,16 +48,17 @@ struct iio_event_interface {
* @indio_dev: IIO device structure
* @ev_code: What event
* @timestamp: When the event occurred
*
* Note: The caller must make sure that this function is not running
* concurrently for the same indio_dev more than once.
**/
int iio_push_event(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, u64 ev_code, s64 timestamp)
{
struct iio_event_interface *ev_int = indio_dev->event_interface;
struct iio_event_data ev;
unsigned long flags;
int copied;
/* Does anyone care? */
spin_lock_irqsave(&ev_int->wait.lock, flags);
if (test_bit(IIO_BUSY_BIT_POS, &ev_int->flags)) {
ev.id = ev_code;
......@@ -64,9 +66,8 @@ int iio_push_event(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, u64 ev_code, s64 timestamp)
copied = kfifo_put(&ev_int->det_events, ev);
if (copied != 0)
wake_up_locked_poll(&ev_int->wait, POLLIN);
wake_up_poll(&ev_int->wait, POLLIN);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ev_int->wait.lock, flags);
return 0;
}
......@@ -87,10 +88,8 @@ static unsigned int iio_event_poll(struct file *filep,
poll_wait(filep, &ev_int->wait, wait);
spin_lock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
if (!kfifo_is_empty(&ev_int->det_events))
events = POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
spin_unlock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
return events;
}
......@@ -111,31 +110,40 @@ static ssize_t iio_event_chrdev_read(struct file *filep,
if (count < sizeof(struct iio_event_data))
return -EINVAL;
spin_lock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
do {
if (kfifo_is_empty(&ev_int->det_events)) {
if (filep->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
ret = -EAGAIN;
goto error_unlock;
}
/* Blocking on device; waiting for something to be there */
ret = wait_event_interruptible_locked_irq(ev_int->wait,
if (filep->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
return -EAGAIN;
ret = wait_event_interruptible(ev_int->wait,
!kfifo_is_empty(&ev_int->det_events) ||
indio_dev->info == NULL);
if (ret)
goto error_unlock;
if (indio_dev->info == NULL) {
ret = -ENODEV;
goto error_unlock;
}
/* Single access device so no one else can get the data */
return ret;
if (indio_dev->info == NULL)
return -ENODEV;
}
if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&ev_int->read_lock))
return -ERESTARTSYS;
ret = kfifo_to_user(&ev_int->det_events, buf, count, &copied);
mutex_unlock(&ev_int->read_lock);
error_unlock:
spin_unlock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
if (ret)
return ret;
return ret ? ret : copied;
/*
* If we couldn't read anything from the fifo (a different
* thread might have been faster) we either return -EAGAIN if
* the file descriptor is non-blocking, otherwise we go back to
* sleep and wait for more data to arrive.
*/
if (copied == 0 && (filep->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK))
return -EAGAIN;
} while (copied == 0);
return copied;
}
static int iio_event_chrdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
......@@ -143,15 +151,7 @@ static int iio_event_chrdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
struct iio_dev *indio_dev = filep->private_data;
struct iio_event_interface *ev_int = indio_dev->event_interface;
spin_lock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
__clear_bit(IIO_BUSY_BIT_POS, &ev_int->flags);
/*
* In order to maintain a clean state for reopening,
* clear out any awaiting events. The mask will prevent
* any new __iio_push_event calls running.
*/
kfifo_reset_out(&ev_int->det_events);
spin_unlock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
clear_bit(IIO_BUSY_BIT_POS, &ev_int->flags);
iio_device_put(indio_dev);
......@@ -174,22 +174,20 @@ int iio_event_getfd(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
if (ev_int == NULL)
return -ENODEV;
spin_lock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
if (__test_and_set_bit(IIO_BUSY_BIT_POS, &ev_int->flags)) {
spin_unlock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
if (test_and_set_bit(IIO_BUSY_BIT_POS, &ev_int->flags))
return -EBUSY;
}
spin_unlock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
iio_device_get(indio_dev);
fd = anon_inode_getfd("iio:event", &iio_event_chrdev_fileops,
indio_dev, O_RDONLY | O_CLOEXEC);
if (fd < 0) {
spin_lock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
__clear_bit(IIO_BUSY_BIT_POS, &ev_int->flags);
spin_unlock_irq(&ev_int->wait.lock);
clear_bit(IIO_BUSY_BIT_POS, &ev_int->flags);
iio_device_put(indio_dev);
} else {
kfifo_reset_out(&ev_int->det_events);
}
return fd;
}
......@@ -424,6 +422,7 @@ static void iio_setup_ev_int(struct iio_event_interface *ev_int)
{
INIT_KFIFO(ev_int->det_events);
init_waitqueue_head(&ev_int->wait);
mutex_init(&ev_int->read_lock);
}
static const char *iio_event_group_name = "events";
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment