Commit bcf08df3 authored by Ingo Molnar's avatar Ingo Molnar

sched: Fix cpupri build on !CONFIG_SMP

This build bug:

 In file included from kernel/sched.c:1765:
 kernel/sched_rt.c: In function ‘has_pushable_tasks’:
 kernel/sched_rt.c:1069: error: ‘struct rt_rq’ has no member named ‘pushable_tasks’
 kernel/sched_rt.c: In function ‘pick_next_task_rt’:
 kernel/sched_rt.c:1084: error: ‘struct rq’ has no member named ‘post_schedule’

Triggers because both pushable_tasks and post_schedule are
SMP-only fields.

Move pushable_tasks() to the SMP section and #ifdef the post_schedule use.

Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <20090729150422.17691.55590.stgit@dev.haskins.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 693525e3
......@@ -136,6 +136,11 @@ static void dequeue_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
plist_del(&p->pushable_tasks, &rq->rt.pushable_tasks);
}
static inline int has_pushable_tasks(struct rq *rq)
{
return !plist_head_empty(&rq->rt.pushable_tasks);
}
#else
static inline void enqueue_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
......@@ -1064,11 +1069,6 @@ static struct task_struct *_pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
return p;
}
static inline int has_pushable_tasks(struct rq *rq)
{
return !plist_head_empty(&rq->rt.pushable_tasks);
}
static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
{
struct task_struct *p = _pick_next_task_rt(rq);
......@@ -1077,11 +1077,13 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
if (p)
dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* We detect this state here so that we can avoid taking the RQ
* lock again later if there is no need to push
*/
rq->post_schedule = has_pushable_tasks(rq);
#endif
return p;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment