Commit c5bc15fc authored by Andreas Fenkart's avatar Andreas Fenkart Committed by Kalle Valo

mwifiex: simplify mwifiex_complete_cmd

600f5d90("mwifiex: cleanup ioctl wait queue and abstraction layer")
introduced the wakeup_interruptible suppression in mwifiex_complete_cmd
b1a47aa5("mwifiex: fix system hang issue in cmd timeout error case")
then added wakup_interruptible to mwifiex_cmd_timeout_func the single
place setting a status of ETIMEDOUT.
Instead of doing extra work, using the standard call-chain will have the
same effect:
mwifiex_cancel_pending_ioctl
-> mwifiex_recycle_cmd_node
-> mwifiex_insert_cmd_to_free_q
-> mwifiex_complete_cmd
-> wake_up_interruptible

The difference is that previously the condition was not set to true,
but that's probably just an oversight in b1a47aa5 and shouldn't
have any consequence
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndreas Fenkart <afenkart@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarAmitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
parent e9f21d40
...@@ -976,7 +976,6 @@ mwifiex_cmd_timeout_func(unsigned long function_context) ...@@ -976,7 +976,6 @@ mwifiex_cmd_timeout_func(unsigned long function_context)
if (cmd_node->wait_q_enabled) { if (cmd_node->wait_q_enabled) {
adapter->cmd_wait_q.status = -ETIMEDOUT; adapter->cmd_wait_q.status = -ETIMEDOUT;
wake_up_interruptible(&adapter->cmd_wait_q.wait);
mwifiex_cancel_pending_ioctl(adapter); mwifiex_cancel_pending_ioctl(adapter);
} }
} }
......
...@@ -66,8 +66,8 @@ int mwifiex_wait_queue_complete(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter, ...@@ -66,8 +66,8 @@ int mwifiex_wait_queue_complete(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter,
if (status <= 0) { if (status <= 0) {
if (status == 0) if (status == 0)
status = -ETIMEDOUT; status = -ETIMEDOUT;
mwifiex_dbg(adapter, ERROR, mwifiex_dbg(adapter, ERROR, "cmd_wait_q terminated: %d\n",
"cmd_wait_q terminated: %d\n", status); status);
mwifiex_cancel_all_pending_cmd(adapter); mwifiex_cancel_all_pending_cmd(adapter);
return status; return status;
} }
......
...@@ -496,15 +496,11 @@ int mwifiex_recv_packet(struct mwifiex_private *priv, struct sk_buff *skb) ...@@ -496,15 +496,11 @@ int mwifiex_recv_packet(struct mwifiex_private *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
int mwifiex_complete_cmd(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter, int mwifiex_complete_cmd(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter,
struct cmd_ctrl_node *cmd_node) struct cmd_ctrl_node *cmd_node)
{ {
mwifiex_dbg(adapter, CMD, WARN_ON(!cmd_node->wait_q_enabled);
"cmd completed: status=%d\n", mwifiex_dbg(adapter, CMD, "cmd completed: status=%d\n",
adapter->cmd_wait_q.status); adapter->cmd_wait_q.status);
*(cmd_node->condition) = true; *cmd_node->condition = true;
if (adapter->cmd_wait_q.status == -ETIMEDOUT)
mwifiex_dbg(adapter, ERROR, "cmd timeout\n");
else
wake_up_interruptible(&adapter->cmd_wait_q.wait); wake_up_interruptible(&adapter->cmd_wait_q.wait);
return 0; return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment