Commit d06e622d authored by Viresh Kumar's avatar Viresh Kumar Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

cpufreq: schedutil: Rectify comment in sugov_irq_work() function

This patch rectifies a comment present in sugov_irq_work() function to
follow proper grammar.
Suggested-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent 21ef5729
......@@ -315,15 +315,15 @@ static void sugov_irq_work(struct irq_work *irq_work)
sg_policy = container_of(irq_work, struct sugov_policy, irq_work);
/*
* For Real Time and Deadline tasks, schedutil governor shoots the
* frequency to maximum. And special care must be taken to ensure that
* this kthread doesn't result in that.
* For RT and deadline tasks, the schedutil governor shoots the
* frequency to maximum. Special care must be taken to ensure that this
* kthread doesn't result in the same behavior.
*
* This is (mostly) guaranteed by the work_in_progress flag. The flag is
* updated only at the end of the sugov_work() and before that schedutil
* rejects all other frequency scaling requests.
* updated only at the end of the sugov_work() function and before that
* the schedutil governor rejects all other frequency scaling requests.
*
* Though there is a very rare case where the RT thread yields right
* There is a very rare case though, where the RT thread yields right
* after the work_in_progress flag is cleared. The effects of that are
* neglected for now.
*/
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment