Commit dd72be99 authored by Bin Gao's avatar Bin Gao Committed by Bjorn Helgaas

x86/pci/mrst: Use configuration mechanism 1 for 00:00.0, 00:02.0, 00:03.0

For real PCI devices 00:00.0, 00:02.0 and 00:03.0, there is either no
PCI shim, or no guarantee of data correctness of offset 256-4k.  So for
whatever reason, Linux kernel should not do MMCFG PCI config access to
those devices.  Instead, always use configuration mechanism 1 for those
devices.

The 00:00.0, 00:02.0 and 00:03.0 devices are built-in single-function
devices and are not PCI-PCI bridges, so this set of devices should be
complete.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBin Gao <bin.gao@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
parent e5f66eaf
...@@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ static int pci_device_update_fixed(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, ...@@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ static int pci_device_update_fixed(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,
*/ */
static bool type1_access_ok(unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg) static bool type1_access_ok(unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg)
{ {
if (bus == 0 && (devfn == PCI_DEVFN(2, 0)
|| devfn == PCI_DEVFN(0, 0)
|| devfn == PCI_DEVFN(3, 0)))
return 1;
/* This is a workaround for A0 LNC bug where PCI status register does /* This is a workaround for A0 LNC bug where PCI status register does
* not have new CAP bit set. can not be written by SW either. * not have new CAP bit set. can not be written by SW either.
* *
...@@ -150,10 +155,7 @@ static bool type1_access_ok(unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg) ...@@ -150,10 +155,7 @@ static bool type1_access_ok(unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg)
*/ */
if (reg >= 0x100 || reg == PCI_STATUS || reg == PCI_HEADER_TYPE) if (reg >= 0x100 || reg == PCI_STATUS || reg == PCI_HEADER_TYPE)
return 0; return 0;
if (bus == 0 && (devfn == PCI_DEVFN(2, 0)
|| devfn == PCI_DEVFN(0, 0)
|| devfn == PCI_DEVFN(3, 0)))
return 1;
return 0; /* langwell on others */ return 0; /* langwell on others */
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment