sock: do not set sk_err in sock_dequeue_err_skb
Do not set sk_err when dequeuing errors from the error queue. Doing so results in: a) Bugs: By overwriting existing sk_err values, it possibly hides legitimate errors. It is also incorrect when local errors are queued with ip_local_error. That happens in the context of a system call, which already returns the error code. b) Inconsistent behavior: When there are pending errors on the error queue, sk_err is sometimes 0 (e.g., for the first timestamp on the error queue) and sometimes set to an error code (after dequeuing the first timestamp). c) Suboptimality: Setting sk_err to ENOMSG on simple TX timestamps can abort parallel reads and writes. Removing this line doesn't break userspace. This is because userspace code cannot rely on sk_err for detecting whether there is something on the error queue. Except for ICMP messages received for UDP and RAW, sk_err is not set at enqueue time, and as a result sk_err can be 0 while there are plenty of errors on the error queue. For ICMP packets in UDP and RAW, sk_err is set when they are enqueued on the error queue, but that does not result in aborting reads and writes. For such cases, sk_err is only readable via getsockopt(SO_ERROR) which will reset the value of sk_err on its own. More importantly, prior to this patch, recvmsg(MSG_ERRQUEUE) has a race on setting sk_err (i.e., sk_err is set by sock_dequeue_err_skb without atomic ops or locks) which can store 0 in sk_err even when we have ICMP messages pending. Removing this line from sock_dequeue_err_skb eliminates that race. Signed-off-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment