- 28 May, 2018 40 commits
-
-
Omar Sandoval authored
I got a report that after upgrading to 4.16, someone's filesystems weren't mounting: [ 23.845852] BTRFS info (device loop0): unrecognized mount option 'subvol=' Before 4.16, this mounted the default subvolume. It turns out that this empty "subvol=" is actually an application bug, but it was causing the application to fail, so it's an ABI break if you squint. The generic parsing code we use for mount options (match_token()) doesn't match an empty string as "%s". Previously, setup_root_args() removed the "subvol=" string, but the mount path was cleaned up to not need that. Add a dummy Opt_subvol_empty to fix this. The simple workaround is to use / or . for the value of 'subvol=' . Fixes: 312c89fb ("btrfs: cleanup btrfs_mount() using btrfs_mount_root()") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.16+ Signed-off-by:
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
Looks like the original idea was to print the hex of the flags which is not coded with their flag name. So use the current buf pointer bp instead of buf. Reaching the uknown flags should never happen, it's there just in case. Fixes: ebce0e01 ("btrfs: make block group flags in balance printks human-readable") Signed-off-by:
Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The dedupe range is 16 MiB, with 4 KiB pages and 8 byte pointers, the arrays can be 32KiB large. To avoid allocation failures due to fragmented memory, use the allocation with fallback to vmalloc. The arrays are allocated and freed only inside btrfs_extent_same and reused for all the ranges. Reviewed-by:
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Timofey Titovets authored
We support big dedup requests by splitting range to smaller parts, and call dedupe logic on each of them. Instead of repeated allocation and deallocation, allocate once at the beginning and reuse in the iteration. Signed-off-by:
Timofey Titovets <nefelim4ag@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Timofey Titovets authored
Currently btrfs_dedupe_file_range silently restricts the dedupe range to to 16MiB to limit locking and working memory size and is documented in manual page as implementation specific. Let's remove that restriction by iterating over the dedup range in 16MiB steps. This is backward compatible and will not change anything for requests smaller then 16MiB. Signed-off-by:
-
Timofey Titovets authored
Split btrfs_extent_same() to two parts where one is the main EXTENT_SAME entry and a helper that can be repeatedly called on a range. This will be used in following patches. Signed-off-by:
-
Omar Sandoval authored
btrfs_link() calls btrfs_orphan_del() if it's linking an O_TMPFILE but it doesn't reserve space to do so. Even before the removal of the orphan_block_rsv it wasn't using it. Fixes: ef3b9af5 ("Btrfs: implement inode_operations callback tmpfile") Reviewed-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Omar Sandoval authored
We got rid of BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM and BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED, so we can renumber the flags to make them consecutive again. Signed-off-by:
-
Omar Sandoval authored
Now that we don't keep long-standing reservations for orphan items, root->orphan_block_rsv isn't used. We can git rid of it, along with: - root->orphan_lock, which was used to protect root->orphan_block_rsv - root->orphan_inodes, which was used as a refcount for root->orphan_block_rsv - BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED, which was used to track reservations in root->orphan_block_rsv - btrfs_orphan_commit_root(), which was the last user of any of these and does nothing else Reviewed-by:
-
Omar Sandoval authored
Currently, we keep space reserved for all inode orphan items until the inode is evicted (i.e., all references to it are dropped). We hit an issue where an application would keep a bunch of deleted files open (by design) and thus keep a large amount of space reserved, causing ENOSPC errors when other operations tried to reserve space. This long-standing reservation isn't absolutely necessary for a couple of reasons: - We can almost always make the reservation we need or steal from the global reserve for the orphan item - If we can't, it's not the end of the world if we drop the orphan item on the floor and let the next mount clean it up So, get rid of persistent reservation and just reserve space in btrfs_evict_inode(). Reviewed-by:
-
Omar Sandoval authored
The truncate loop in btrfs_evict_inode() does two things at once: - It refills the temporary block reserve, potentially stealing from the global reserve or committing - It calls btrfs_truncate_inode_items() The tangle of continues hides the fact that these two steps are actually separate. Split the first step out into a separate function both for clarity and so that we can reuse it in a later patch. Reviewed-by:
-
Omar Sandoval authored
In btrfs_evict_inode(), if btrfs_truncate_inode_items() fails, the inode item will still be in the tree but we still return the ino to the ino cache. That will blow up later when someone tries to allocate that ino, so don't return it to the cache. Fixes: 581bb050 ("Btrfs: Cache free inode numbers in memory") Reviewed-by:
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Omar Sandoval authored
btrfs_orphan_commit_root() tries to delete an orphan item for a subvolume in the tree root, but we don't actually insert that item in the first place. See commit 0a0d4415 ("Btrfs: delete dead code in btrfs_orphan_add()"). We can get rid of it. Reviewed-by:
-
Omar Sandoval authored
Now that we don't add orphan items for truncate, there can't be races on adding or deleting an orphan item, so this bit is unnecessary. Reviewed-by:
-
Omar Sandoval authored
Currently, we insert an orphan item during a truncate so that if there's a crash, we don't leak extents past the on-disk i_size. However, since commit 7f4f6e0a ("Btrfs: only update disk_i_size as we remove extents"), we keep disk_i_size in sync with the extent items as we truncate, so orphan cleanup will never have any extents to remove. Don't bother with the superfluous orphan item. Reviewed-by:
-
Omar Sandoval authored
btrfs_free_extent() can fail because of ENOMEM. There's no reason to panic here, we can just abort the transaction. Fixes: f4b9aa8d ("btrfs_truncate") Reviewed-by:
-
Omar Sandoval authored
btrfs_truncate_inode_items() uses two variables for error handling, ret and err. These are not handled consistently, leading to a couple of bugs. - Errors from btrfs_del_items() are handled but not propagated to the caller - If btrfs_run_delayed_refs() fails and aborts the transaction, we continue running Just use ret everywhere and simplify things a bit, fixing both of these issues. Fixes: 79787eaa ("btrfs: replace many BUG_ONs with proper error handling") Fixes: 1262133b ("Btrfs: account for crcs in delayed ref processing") Reviewed-by:
-
Omar Sandoval authored
Commit a41ad394 ("Btrfs: convert to the new truncate sequence") changed btrfs_setsize() to call truncate_setsize() instead of vmtruncate() but didn't update the comment above it. truncate_setsize() never fails (the IS_SWAPFILE() check happens elsewhere), so remove the comment. Additionally, the comment above btrfs_page_mkwrite() references vmtruncate(), but truncate_setsize() does the size write and page locking now. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
select_delayed_ref really just gets the next delayed ref which has to be processed - either an add ref or drop ref. We never go back for anything. So the comment is actually bogus, just remove it. Signed-off-by:
-
Misono Tomohiro authored
Deletion of a subvolume by rmdir(2) has become allowed by the 'commit cd2decf640b1 ("btrfs: Allow rmdir(2) to delete an empty subvolume")'. It is a kind of new feature and this commits add a sysfs entry /sys/fs/btrfs/features/rmdir_subvol to indicate the availability of the feature so that a user program (e.g. fstests) can detect it. Prior to this commit, all entries in /sys/fs/btrfs/features are feature which depend on feature bits of superblock (i.e. each feature affects on-disk format) and managed by attribute_group "btrfs_feature_attr_group". For each fs, entries in /sys/fs/btrfs/UUID/features indicate which features are enabled (or can be changed online) for the fs. However, rmdir_subvol feature only depends on kernel module. Therefore new attribute_group "btrfs_static_feature_attr_group" is introduced and sysfs_merge_group() is used to share /sys/fs/btrfs/features directory. Features in "btrfs_static_feature_attr_group" won't be listed in each /sys/fs/btrfs/UUID/features. Signed-off-by:Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Tomohiro Misono authored
Use existing named values instead of the raw numbers. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
Kernel logs are very important for the forensic investigations of the issues in general make it easy to use it. This patch adds 'balance:' prefix so that it can be easily searched. Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
* The simple 'flags' refer to the btrfs inode * ... that's in 'binode * the FS_*_FL variables are 'fsflags' * the old copies of the variable are prefixed by 'old_' * Struct inode flags contain 'i_flags'. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
The new ioctl is an extension to the FS_IOC_SETFLAGS and adds new flags and is extensible. Don't get fooled by the XATTR in the name, it does not have anything in common with the extended attributes, incidentally also abbreviated as XATTRs. This patch allows to set the xflags portion of the fsxattr structure, other items have no meaning and non-zero values will result in EOPNOTSUPP. Currently supported xflags: - APPEND - IMMUTABLE - NOATIME - NODUMP - SYNC The structure of btrfs_ioctl_fssetxattr copies btrfs_ioctl_setflags but is simpler on the flag setting side. The original patch was written by Chandan Jay Sharma but was incomplete and no further revision has been sent. Based-on-patches-by:
Chandan Jay Sharma <chandansbg@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The new ioctl is an extension to the FS_IOC_GETFLAGS and adds new flags and is extensible. This patch allows to return the xflags portion of the fsxattr structure, other items have no meaning for btrfs or can be added later. The original patch was written by Chandan Jay Sharma but was incomplete and no further revision has been sent. Several cleanups were necessary to avoid confusion with other ioctls, as we have another flavor of flags. Based-on-patches-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Preparatory work for the FS_IOC_FSGETXATTR ioctl, basic conversions and checking helpers. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
Converts btrfs_inode::flags to the FS_*_FL flags. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
The FS_*_FL flags cannot be easily identified by a prefix but we still need to recognize them so the 'fsflags' should be closer to the naming scheme but again the 'fs' part sounds like it's a filesystem flag. I don't have a better idea for now. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
The FS_*_FL flags cannot be easily identified by a variable name prefix but we still need to recognize them so the 'fsflags' should be closer to the naming scheme but again the 'fs' part sounds like it's a filesystem flag. I don't have a better idea for now. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
The btrfs inode flag flavour is now simply called 'inode flags' and the vfs inode are i_flags. Signed-off-by: -
Anand Jain authored
Use a local btrfs_fs_devices variable to access the structure. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
Delete the uuid_mutex lock here as this thread accesses the btrfs_fs_devices::devices only (counters or called functions do a list traversal). And the device_list_mutex lock is already taken. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
btrfs_dev_replace_finishing updates devices (soruce and target) which are within the btrfs_fs_devices::devices or withint the cloned seed devices (btrfs_fs_devices::seed::devices), so we don't need the global uuid_mutex. The device replace context is also locked by its own locks. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
btrfs_open_devices() is using the uuid_mutex, but as btrfs_open_devices is just limited to openning all the devices under for given fsid, so we don't need uuid_mutex. Instead it should hold the device_list_mutex as it updates the members of the btrfs_fs_devices and btrfs_device and not the whole fs_devs list. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
read_chunk_tree() calls read_one_dev(), but for seed device we have to search the fs_uuids list, so we need the uuid_mutex. Add a comment comment, so that we can improve this part. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
Instead of de-referencing the device->fs_devices use cur_devices which points to the same fs_devices and does not change. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
The generic block device lookup or cleanup does not need the uuid mutex, that's only for the device_list_add. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function is no longer used outside of inode.c so just make it static. At the same time give a more becoming name, since it's not really invalidating the inodes but just calling d_prune_alias. Last, but not least - move the function above the sole caller to avoid introducing yet-another-pointless forward declaration. Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Use the wrappers and reduce the amount of low-level details about the waitqueue management. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Currently the code assumes that there's an implied barrier by the sequence of code preceding the wakeup, namely the mutex unlock. As Nikolay pointed out: I think this is wrong (not your code) but the original assumption that the RELEASE semantics provided by mutex_unlock is sufficient. According to memory-barriers.txt: Section 'LOCK ACQUISITION FUNCTIONS' states: (2) RELEASE operation implication: Memory operations issued before the RELEASE will be completed before the RELEASE operation has completed. Memory operations issued after the RELEASE *may* be completed before the RELEASE operation has completed. (I've bolded the may portion) The example given there: As an example, consider the following: *A = a; *B = b; ACQUIRE *C = c; *D = d; RELEASE *E = e; *F = f; The following sequence of events is acceptable: ACQUIRE, {*F,*A}, *E, {*C,*D}, *B, RELEASE So if we assume that *C is modifying the flag which the waitqueue is checking, and *E is the actual wakeup, then those accesses can be re-ordered... IMHO this code should be considered broken... --- To be on the safe side, add the barriers. The synchronization logic around log using the mutexes and several other threads does not make it easy to reason for/against the barrier. CC: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/6ee068d8-1a69-3728-00d1-d86293d43c9f@suse.comReviewed-by:
-
