1. 16 Sep, 2020 6 commits
  2. 11 Sep, 2020 1 commit
  3. 10 Sep, 2020 12 commits
  4. 09 Sep, 2020 12 commits
  5. 04 Sep, 2020 1 commit
  6. 03 Sep, 2020 7 commits
  7. 31 Aug, 2020 1 commit
    • Dave Hansen's avatar
      Documentation: clarify driver licensing rules · 755a2f18
      Dave Hansen authored
      Greg has challenged some recent driver submitters on their license
      choices. He was correct to do so, as the choices in these instances
      did not always advance the aims of the submitters.
      
      But, this left submitters (and the folks who help them pick licenses)
      a bit confused. They have read things like
      Documentation/process/license-rules.rst which says:
      
      	individual source files can have a different license
      	which is required to be compatible with the GPL-2.0
      
      and Documentation/process/submitting-drivers.rst:
      
      	We don't insist on any kind of exclusive GPL licensing,
      	and if you wish ... you may well wish to release under
      	multiple licenses.
      
      As written, these appear a _bit_ more laissez faire than we've been in
      practice lately. It sounds like we at least expect submitters to make
      a well-reasoned license choice and to explain their rationale. It does
      not appear that we blindly accept anything that is simply
      GPLv2-compatible.
      
      Drivers appear to be the most acute source of misunderstanding, so fix
      the driver documentation first. Update it to clarify expectations.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <h.peter.anvin@intel.com>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200814145625.8B708079@viggo.jf.intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
      755a2f18