- 01 Feb, 2018 40 commits
-
-
David Rientjes authored
Commit 4d4bbd85 ("mm, oom_reaper: skip mm structs with mmu notifiers") prevented the oom reaper from unmapping private anonymous memory with the oom reaper when the oom victim mm had mmu notifiers registered. The rationale is that doing mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_{start,end}() around the unmap_page_range(), which is needed, can block and the oom killer will stall forever waiting for the victim to exit, which may not be possible without reaping. That concern is real, but only true for mmu notifiers that have blockable invalidate_range_{start,end}() callbacks. This patch adds a "flags" field to mmu notifier ops that can set a bit to indicate that these callbacks do not block. The implementation is steered toward an expensive slowpath, such as after the oom reaper has grabbed mm->mmap_sem of a still alive oom victim. [rientjes@google.com: mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end() can also call the invalidate_range() must not block, fix comment] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.10.1801091339570.240101@chino.kir.corp.google.com [akpm@linux-foundation.org: make mm_has_blockable_invalidate_notifiers() return bool, use rwsem_is_locked()] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.10.1712141329500.74052@chino.kir.corp.google.comSigned-off-by:
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Acked-by:
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by:
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Acked-by:
Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Acked-by:
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@hpe.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Cc: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
Yang Shi authored
In the current design, khugepaged needs to acquire mmap_sem before scanning an mm. But in some corner cases, khugepaged may scan a process which is modifying its memory mapping, so khugepaged blocks in uninterruptible state. But the process might hold the mmap_sem for a long time when modifying a huge memory space and it may trigger the below khugepaged hung issue: INFO: task khugepaged:270 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Tainted: G E 4.9.65-006.ali3000.alios7.x86_64 #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. khugepaged D 0 270 2 0x00000000 ffff883f3deae4c0 0000000000000000 ffff883f610596c0 ffff883f7d359440 ffff883f63818000 ffffc90019adfc78 ffffffff817079a5 d67e5aa8c1860a64 0000000000000246 ffff883f7d359440 ffffc90019adfc88 ffff883f610596c0 Call Trace: schedule+0x36/0x80 rwsem_down_read_failed+0xf0/0x150 call_rwsem_down_read_failed+0x18/0x30 down_read+0x20/0x40 khugepaged+0x476/0x11d0 kthread+0xe6/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30 So it sounds pointless to just block khugepaged waiting for the semaphore so replace down_read() with down_read_trylock() to move to scan the next mm quickly instead of just blocking on the semaphore so that other processes can get more chances to install THP. Then khugepaged can come back to scan the skipped mm when it has finished the current round full_scan. And it appears that the change can improve khugepaged efficiency a little bit. Below is the test result when running LTP on a 24 cores 4GB memory 2 nodes NUMA VM: pristine w/ trylock full_scan 197 187 pages_collapsed 21 26 thp_fault_alloc 40818 44466 thp_fault_fallback 18413 16679 thp_collapse_alloc 21 150 thp_collapse_alloc_failed 14 16 thp_file_alloc 369 369 [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak comment] [arnd@arndb.de: avoid uninitialized variable use] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171215125129.2948634-1-arnd@arndb.de Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1513281203-54878-1-git-send-email-yang.s@alibaba-inc.comSigned-off-by:Yang Shi <yang.s@alibaba-inc.com> Acked-by:
Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by:
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Aneesh Kumar K.V authored
Instead of marking the pmd ready for split, invalidate the pmd. This should take care of powerpc requirement. Only side effect is that we mark the pmd invalid early. This can result in us blocking access to the page a bit longer if we race against a thp split. [kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com: rebased, dirty THP once] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171213105756.69879-13-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by:
Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Kirill A. Shutemov authored
Use the modifed pmdp_invalidate() that returns the previous value of pmd to transfer dirty and accessed bits. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171213105756.69879-12-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by:
-
Kirill A. Shutemov authored
Vlastimil noted that pmdp_invalidate() is not atomic and we can lose dirty and access bits if CPU sets them after pmdp dereference, but before set_pmd_at(). The patch change pmdp_invalidate() to make the entry non-present atomically and return previous value of the entry. This value can be used to check if CPU set dirty/accessed bits under us. The race window is very small and I haven't seen any reports that can be attributed to the bug. For this reason, I don't think backporting to stable trees needed. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171213105756.69879-11-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by:
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Nitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Kirill A. Shutemov authored
We need an atomic way to setup pmd page table entry, avoiding races with CPU setting dirty/accessed bits. This is required to implement pmdp_invalidate() that doesn't lose these bits. On PAE we can avoid expensive cmpxchg8b for cases when new page table entry is not present. If it's present, fallback to cpmxchg loop. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: add missing `do' to do-while loop] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171213105756.69879-10-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by:
-
Nitin Gupta authored
It's required to avoid losing dirty and accessed bits. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: add a `do' to the do-while loop] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171213105756.69879-9-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by:
Nitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Martin Schwidefsky authored
It's required to avoid losing dirty and accessed bits. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171213105756.69879-8-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by:
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Aneesh Kumar K.V authored
It's required to avoid losing dirty and accessed bits. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171213105756.69879-7-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by:
-
Kirill A. Shutemov authored
MIPS doesn't support hardware dirty/accessed bits. generic_pmdp_establish() is suitable in this case. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171213105756.69879-6-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by:
-
Catalin Marinas authored
We need an atomic way to setup pmd page table entry, avoiding races with CPU setting dirty/accessed bits. This is required to implement pmdp_invalidate() that doesn't lose these bits. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171213105756.69879-5-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by:
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Kirill A. Shutemov authored
ARM LPAE doesn't have hardware dirty/accessed bits. generic_pmdp_establish() is the right implementation of pmdp_establish for this case. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171213105756.69879-4-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by:
-
Kirill A. Shutemov authored
ARC doesn't support hardware dirty/accessed bits. generic_pmdp_establish() is suitable in this case. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171213105756.69879-3-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by:
-
Kirill A. Shutemov authored
Patch series "Do not lose dirty bit on THP pages", v4. Vlastimil noted that pmdp_invalidate() is not atomic and we can lose dirty and access bits if CPU sets them after pmdp dereference, but before set_pmd_at(). The bug can lead to data loss, but the race window is tiny and I haven't seen any reports that suggested that it happens in reality. So I don't think it worth sending it to stable. Unfortunately, there's no way to address the issue in a generic way. We need to fix all architectures that support THP one-by-one. All architectures that have THP supported have to provide atomic pmdp_invalidate() that returns previous value. If generic implementation of pmdp_invalidate() is used, architecture needs to provide atomic pmdp_estabish(). pmdp_estabish() is not used out-side generic implementation of pmdp_invalidate() so far, but I think this can change in the future. This patch (of 12): This is an implementation of pmdp_establish() that is only suitable for an architecture that doesn't have hardware dirty/accessed bits. In this case we can't race with CPU which sets these bits and non-atomic approach is fine. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171213105756.69879-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by:
-
Matthew Wilcox authored
We don't have to use an entire 'long' for the number of elements in the pagevec; we know it's a number between 0 and 14 (now 15). So we can store it in a char, and then the bool packs next to it and we still have two or six bytes of padding for more elements in the header. That gives us space to cram in an extra page. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171206022521.GM26021@bombadil.infradead.orgSigned-off-by:
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Acked-by:
-
Matthew Wilcox authored
Several users of unmap_mapping_range() would prefer to express their range in pages rather than bytes. Unfortuately, on a 32-bit kernel, you have to remember to cast your page number to a 64-bit type before shifting it, and four places in the current tree didn't remember to do that. That's a sign of a bad interface. Conveniently, unmap_mapping_range() actually converts from bytes into pages, so hoist the guts of unmap_mapping_range() into a new function unmap_mapping_pages() and convert the callers which want to use pages. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171206142627.GD32044@bombadil.infradead.orgSigned-off-by:
"zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by:
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Acked-by:
-
Huang Ying authored
If THP migration is enabled, for a VMA handled by userfaultfd, consider the following situation, do_page_fault() __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page() handle_userfault() userfault_msg() /* a huge page is allocated and mapped at fault address */ /* the huge page is under migration, leaves migration entry in page table */ userfaultfd_must_wait() /* return true because !pmd_present() */ /* may wait in loop until fatal signal */ That is, it may be possible for userfaultfd_must_wait() encounters a PMD entry which is !pmd_none() && !pmd_present(). In the current implementation, we will wait for such PMD entries, which may cause unnecessary waiting, and potential soft lockup. This is fixed via avoiding to wait when !pmd_none() && !pmd_present(), only wait when pmd_none(). This may be not a problem in practice, because userfaultfd_must_wait() is always called with mm->mmap_sem read-locked. mremap() will write-lock mm->mmap_sem. And UFFDIO_COPY doesn't support to copy THP mapping. But the change introduced still makes the code more correct, and makes the PMD and PTE code more consistent. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171207011752.3292-1-ying.huang@intel.comSigned-off-by:"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.UK> Cc: Zi Yan <zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Yisheng Xie authored
pmd_trans_splitting() was removed after THP refcounting redesign, therefore related comment should be updated. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512625745-59451-1-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com> Acked-by:
-
Oscar Salvador authored
In register_page_bootmem_info_section() we call __nr_to_section() in order to get the mem_section struct at the beginning of the function. Since we already got it, there is no need for a second call to __nr_to_section(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171207102914.GA12396@techadventures.netSigned-off-by:
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@techadventures.net> Acked-by:
-
Konstantin Khlebnikov authored
If start_code / end_code pointers are screwed then "VmExe" could be bigger than total executable virtual memory and "VmLib" becomes negative: VmExe: 294320 kB VmLib: 18446744073709327564 kB VmExe and VmLib documented as text segment and shared library code size. Now their sum will be always equal to mm->exec_vm which sums size of executable and not writable and not stack areas. I've seen this for huge (>2Gb) statically linked binary which has whole world inside. For it start_code .. end_code range also covers one of rodata sections. Probably this is bug in customized linker, elf loader or both. Anyway CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE allows to change these pointers, thus we cannot trust them without validation. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/150728955451.743749.11276392315459539583.stgit@buzzSigned-off-by:
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> Acked-by:
-
Mike Rapoport authored
The comment describes @fullmm argument, but the function has no such parameter. Update the comment to match the code and convert it to kernel-doc markup. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512394531-2264-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by:
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Oscar Salvador authored
When we call register_page_bootmem_info_section() having CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP enabled, we check if the pfn is valid. This check is redundant as we already checked this in register_page_bootmem_info_node() before calling register_page_bootmem_info_section(), so let's get rid of it. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171205143422.GA31458@techadventures.netSigned-off-by:
-
Michal Hocko authored
hugepages_treat_as_movable has been introduced by 396faf03 ("Allow huge page allocations to use GFP_HIGH_MOVABLE") to allow hugetlb allocations from ZONE_MOVABLE even when hugetlb pages were not migrateable. The purpose of the movable zone was different at the time. It aimed at reducing memory fragmentation and hugetlb pages being long lived and large werre not contributing to the fragmentation so it was acceptable to use the zone back then. Things have changed though and the primary purpose of the zone became migratability guarantee. If we allow non migrateable hugetlb pages to be in ZONE_MOVABLE memory hotplug might fail to offline the memory. Remove the knob and only rely on hugepage_migration_supported to allow movable zones. Mel said: : Primarily it was aimed at allowing the hugetlb pool to safely shrink with : the ability to grow it again. The use case was for batched jobs, some of : which needed huge pages and others that did not but didn't want the memory : useless pinned in the huge pages pool. : : I suspect that more users rely on THP than hugetlbfs for flexible use of : huge pages with fallback options so I think that removing the option : should be ok. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171003072619.8654-1-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> Acked-by:
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jan Kara authored
Remove unused function pgdat_reclaimable_pages() and node_page_state_snapshot() which becomes unused as well. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171122094416.26019-1-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by:
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by:
-
Vasyl Gomonovych authored
Use vma_pages function on vma object instead of explicit computation. mm/interval_tree.c:21:27-33: WARNING: Consider using vma_pages helper Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/vma_pages.cocci Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1511364410-13499-1-git-send-email-gomonovych@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
Vasyl Gomonovych <gomonovych@gmail.com> Acked-by:
Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Acked-by:
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Aneesh Kumar K.V authored
Architectures like PPC64 support mmap hint address based large address space selection. This test can be run on those architectures too. Move the test from the x86 selftests to selftest/vm so that other architectures can use it too. We also add a few new test scenarios in this patch. We do test a few boundary conditions before we do a high address mmap. PPC64 uses the address limit to validate the address in the fault path. We had bugs in this area w.r.t SLB fault handling before we updated the addess limit. We also touch the allocated space to make sure we don't have any bugs in the fault handling path. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile alpha ordering] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171123165226.32582-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by:
-
Minchan Kim authored
Shakeel Butt reported he has observed in production systems that the job loader gets stuck for 10s of seconds while doing a mount operation. It turns out that it was stuck in register_shrinker() because some unrelated job was under memory pressure and was spending time in shrink_slab(). Machines have a lot of shrinkers registered and jobs under memory pressure have to traverse all of those memcg-aware shrinkers and affect unrelated jobs which want to register their own shrinkers. To solve the issue, this patch simply bails out slab shrinking if it is found that someone wants to register a shrinker in parallel. A downside is it could cause unfair shrinking between shrinkers. However, it should be rare and we can add compilcated logic if we find it's not enough. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak code comment] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171115005602.GB23810@bbox Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1511481899-20335-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Reported-by:
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by:
-
Jiankang Chen authored
__get_free_pages() will return a virtual address, but it is not just a 32-bit address, for example on a 64-bit system. And this comment really confuses new readers of mm. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1511780964-64864-1-git-send-email-chenjiankang1@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
Jiankang Chen <chenjiankang1@huawei.com> Reported-by:
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Vasyl Gomonovych authored
Fix ptr_ret.cocci warnings: mm/page_owner.c:639:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be used Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/ptr_ret.cocci Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1511824101-9597-1-git-send-email-gomonovych@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Johannes Weiner authored
We've seen memory.stat reads in top-level cgroups take up to fourteen seconds during a userspace bug that created tens of thousands of ghost cgroups pinned by lingering page cache. Even with a more reasonable number of cgroups, aggregating memory.stat is unnecessarily heavy. The complexity is this: nr_cgroups * nr_stat_items * nr_possible_cpus where the stat items are ~70 at this point. With 128 cgroups and 128 CPUs - decent, not enormous setups - reading the top-level memory.stat has to aggregate over a million per-cpu counters. This doesn't scale. Instead of spreading the source of truth across all CPUs, use the per-cpu counters merely to batch updates to shared atomic counters. This is the same as the per-cpu stocks we use for charging memory to the shared atomic page_counters, and also the way the global vmstat counters are implemented. Vmstat has elaborate spilling thresholds that depend on the number of CPUs, amount of memory, and memory pressure - carefully balancing the cost of counter updates with the amount of per-cpu error. That's because the vmstat counters are system-wide, but also used for decisions inside the kernel (e.g. NR_FREE_PAGES in the allocator). Neither is true for the memory controller. Use the same static batch size we already use for page_counter updates during charging. The per-cpu error in the stats will be 128k, which is an acceptable ratio of cores to memory accounting granularity. [hannes@cmpxchg.org: fix warning in __this_cpu_xchg() calls] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171201135750.GB8097@cmpxchg.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171103153336.24044-3-hannes@cmpxchg.orgSigned-off-by:
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Johannes Weiner authored
The implementation of the lruvec stat functions and their variants for accounting through a page, or accounting from a preemptible context, are mostly identical and needlessly repetitive. Implement the lruvec_page functions by looking up the page's lruvec and then using the lruvec function. Implement the functions for preemptible contexts by disabling preemption before calling the atomic context functions. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171103153336.24044-2-hannes@cmpxchg.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Johannes Weiner authored
Replace all raw 'this_cpu_' modifications of the stat and event per-cpu counters with API functions such as mod_memcg_state(). This makes the code easier to read, but is also in preparation for the next patch, which changes the per-cpu implementation of those counters. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171103153336.24044-1-hannes@cmpxchg.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Yang Shi authored
in_atomic() has been moved to include/linux/preempt.h, and the filemap.c doesn't use in_atomic() directly at all, so it sounds unnecessary to include hardirq.h. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509985319-38633-1-git-send-email-yang.s@alibaba-inc.comSigned-off-by:
-
Pavel Tatashin authored
In deferred_init_range() we initialize struct pages, and also free them to buddy allocator. We do it in separate loops, because buddy page is computed ahead, so we do not want to access a struct page that has not been initialized yet. There is still, however, a corner case where it is potentially possible to access uninitialized struct page: this is when buddy page is from the next memblock range. This patch fixes this problem by splitting deferred_init_range() into two functions: one to initialize struct pages, and another to free them. In addition, this patch brings the following improvements: - Get rid of __def_free() helper function. And simplifies loop logic by adding a new pfn validity check function: deferred_pfn_valid(). - Reduces number of variables that we track. So, there is a higher chance that we will avoid using stack to store/load variables inside hot loops. - Enables future multi-threading of these functions: do initialization in multiple threads, wait for all threads to finish, do freeing part in multithreading. Tested on x86 with 1T of memory to make sure no regressions are introduced. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix spello in comment] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171107150446.32055-2-pasha.tatashin@oracle.comSigned-off-by:
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> Acked-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Previously we were using the ratio of the number of lru pages scanned to the number of eligible lru pages to determine the number of slab objects to scan. The problem with this is that these two things have nothing to do with each other, so in slab heavy work loads where there is little to no page cache we can end up with the pages scanned being a very low number. This means that we reclaim next to no slab pages and waste a lot of time reclaiming small amounts of space. Consider the following scenario, where we have the following values and the rest of the memory usage is in slab Active: 58840 kB Inactive: 46860 kB Every time we do a get_scan_count() we do this scan = size >> sc->priority where sc->priority starts at DEF_PRIORITY, which is 12. The first loop through reclaim would result in a scan target of 2 pages to 11715 total inactive pages, and 3 pages to 14710 total active pages. This is a really really small target for a system that is entirely slab pages. And this is super optimistic, this assumes we even get to scan these pages. We don't increment sc->nr_scanned unless we 1) isolate the page, which assumes it's not in use, and 2) can lock the page. Under pressure these numbers could probably go down, I'm sure there's some random pages from daemons that aren't actually in use, so the targets get even smaller. Instead use sc->priority in the same way we use it to determine scan amounts for the lru's. This generally equates to pages. Consider the following slab_pages = (nr_objects * object_size) / PAGE_SIZE What we would like to do is scan = slab_pages >> sc->priority but we don't know the number of slab pages each shrinker controls, only the objects. However say that theoretically we knew how many pages a shrinker controlled, we'd still have to convert this to objects, which would look like the following scan = shrinker_pages >> sc->priority scan_objects = (PAGE_SIZE / object_size) * scan or written another way scan_objects = (shrinker_pages >> sc->priority) * (PAGE_SIZE / object_size) which can thus be written scan_objects = ((shrinker_pages * PAGE_SIZE) / object_size) >> sc->priority which is just scan_objects = nr_objects >> sc->priority We don't need to know exactly how many pages each shrinker represents, it's objects are all the information we need. Making this change allows us to place an appropriate amount of pressure on the shrinker pools for their relative size. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1510780549-6812-1-git-send-email-josef@toxicpanda.comSigned-off-by:
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Acked-by:
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Acked-by:
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Roman Gushchin authored
Currently we display some hugepage statistics (total, free, etc) in /proc/meminfo, but only for default hugepage size (e.g. 2Mb). If hugepages of different sizes are used (like 2Mb and 1Gb on x86-64), /proc/meminfo output can be confusing, as non-default sized hugepages are not reflected at all, and there are no signs that they are existing and consuming system memory. To solve this problem, let's display the total amount of memory, consumed by hugetlb pages of all sized (both free and used). Let's call it "Hugetlb", and display size in kB to match generic /proc/meminfo style. For example, (1024 2Mb pages and 2 1Gb pages are pre-allocated): $ cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 8168984 kB MemFree: 3789276 kB <...> CmaFree: 0 kB HugePages_Total: 1024 HugePages_Free: 1024 HugePages_Rsvd: 0 HugePages_Surp: 0 Hugepagesize: 2048 kB Hugetlb: 4194304 kB DirectMap4k: 32632 kB DirectMap2M: 4161536 kB DirectMap1G: 6291456 kB Also, this patch updates corresponding docs to reflect Hugetlb entry meaning and difference between Hugetlb and HugePages_Total * Hugepagesize. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171115231409.12131-1-guro@fb.comSigned-off-by:
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Acked-by:
-
Michal Hocko authored
Pulling cpu hotplug locks inside the mm core function like lru_add_drain_all just asks for problems and the recent lockdep splat [1] just proves this. While the usage in that particular case might be wrong we should avoid the locking as lru_add_drain_all() is used in many places. It seems that this is not all that hard to achieve actually. We have done the same thing for drain_all_pages which is analogous by commit a459eeb7 ("mm, page_alloc: do not depend on cpu hotplug locks inside the allocator"). All we have to care about is to handle - the work item might be executed on a different cpu in worker from unbound pool so it doesn't run on pinned on the cpu - we have to make sure that we do not race with page_alloc_cpu_dead calling lru_add_drain_cpu the first part is already handled because the worker calls lru_add_drain which disables preemption when calling lru_add_drain_cpu on the local cpu it is draining. The later is true because page_alloc_cpu_dead is called on the controlling CPU after the hotplugged CPU vanished completely. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/089e0825eec8955c1f055c83d476@google.com [add a cpu hotplug locking interaction as per tglx] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171116120535.23765-1-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Yisheng Xie authored
As in manpage of migrate_pages, the errno should be set to EINVAL when none of the node IDs specified by new_nodes are on-line and allowed by the process's current cpuset context, or none of the specified nodes contain memory. However, when test by following case: new_nodes = 0; old_nodes = 0xf; ret = migrate_pages(pid, old_nodes, new_nodes, MAX); The ret will be 0 and no errno is set. As the new_nodes is empty, we should expect EINVAL as documented. To fix the case like above, this patch check whether target nodes AND current task_nodes is empty, and then check whether AND node_states[N_MEMORY] is empty. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1510882624-44342-4-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Yisheng Xie authored
As Xiaojun reported the ltp of migrate_pages01 will fail on arm64 system which has 4 nodes[0...3], all have memory and CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT=2: migrate_pages01 0 TINFO : test_invalid_nodes migrate_pages01 14 TFAIL : migrate_pages_common.c:45: unexpected failure - returned value = 0, expected: -1 migrate_pages01 15 TFAIL : migrate_pages_common.c:55: call succeeded unexpectedly In this case the test_invalid_nodes of migrate_pages01 will call: SYSC_migrate_pages as: migrate_pages(0, , {0x0000000000000001}, 64, , {0x0000000000000010}, 64) = 0 The new nodes specifies one or more node IDs that are greater than the maximum supported node ID, however, the errno is not set to EINVAL as expected. As man pages of set_mempolicy[1], mbind[2], and migrate_pages[3] mentioned, when nodemask specifies one or more node IDs that are greater than the maximum supported node ID, the errno should set to EINVAL. However, get_nodes only check whether the part of bits [BITS_PER_LONG*BITS_TO_LONGS(MAX_NUMNODES), maxnode) is zero or not, and remain [MAX_NUMNODES, BITS_PER_LONG*BITS_TO_LONGS(MAX_NUMNODES) unchecked. This patch is to check the bits of [MAX_NUMNODES, maxnode) in get_nodes to let migrate_pages set the errno to EINVAL when nodemask specifies one or more node IDs that are greater than the maximum supported node ID, which follows the manpage's guide. [1] http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/set_mempolicy.2.html [2] http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/mbind.2.html [3] http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/migrate_pages.2.html Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1510882624-44342-3-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.comSigned-off-by:Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@huawei.com> Acked-by:
-
Yisheng Xie authored
We have already checked whether maxnode is a page worth of bits, by: maxnode > PAGE_SIZE*BITS_PER_BYTE So no need to check it once more. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1510882624-44342-2-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
