- 09 Jun, 2020 40 commits
-
-
Mike Rapoport authored
All architectures define pte_index() as (address >> PAGE_SHIFT) & (PTRS_PER_PTE - 1) and all architectures define pte_offset_kernel() as an entry in the array of PTEs indexed by the pte_index(). For the most architectures the pte_offset_kernel() implementation relies on the availability of pmd_page_vaddr() that converts a PMD entry value to the virtual address of the page containing PTEs array. Let's move x86 definitions of the PTE accessors to the generic place in <linux/pgtable.h> and then simply drop the respective definitions from the other architectures. The architectures that didn't provide pmd_page_vaddr() are updated to have that defined. The generic implementation of pte_offset_kernel() can be overridden by an architecture and alpha makes use of this because it has special ordering requirements for its version of pte_offset_kernel(). [rppt@linux.ibm.com: v2] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200514170327.31389-11-rppt@kernel.org [rppt@linux.ibm.com: update] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200514170327.31389-12-rppt@kernel.org [rppt@linux.ibm.com: update] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200514170327.31389-13-rppt@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix x86 warning] [sfr@canb.auug.org.au: fix powerpc build] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200607153443.GB738695@linux.ibm.comSigned-off-by:
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Ley Foon Tan <ley.foon.tan@intel.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200514170327.31389-10-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
Mike Rapoport authored
The powerpc 32-bit implementation of pgtable has nice shortcuts for accessing kernel PMD and PTE for a given virtual address. Make these helpers available for all architectures. [rppt@linux.ibm.com: microblaze: fix page table traversal in setup_rt_frame()] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200518191511.GD1118872@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/pmd_ptr_k/pmd_off_k/ in various powerpc places] Signed-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport authored
There are three cases for the trampoline initialization: * 32-bit does nothing * 64-bit with kaslr disabled simply copies a PGD entry from the direct map to the trampoline PGD * 64-bit with kaslr enabled maps the real mode trampoline at PUD level These cases are currently differentiated by a bunch of ifdefs inside asm/include/pgtable.h and the case of 64-bits with kaslr on uses pgd_index() helper. Replacing the ifdefs with a static function in arch/x86/mm/init.c gives clearer code and allows moving pgd_index() to the generic implementation in include/linux/pgtable.h [rppt@linux.ibm.com: take CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY into account in kaslr_enabled()] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200525104045.GB13212@linux.ibm.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport authored
The cache_page() and nocache_page() functions are only used by the motorola MMU variant for setting caching attributes for the page table pages. Move the definitions of these functions from arch/m68k/include/asm/motorola_pgtable.h closer to their usage in arch/m68k/mm/motorola.c and drop unused definition in arch/m68k/include/asm/mcf_pgtable.h. Signed-off-by:
Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com> Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Ley Foon Tan <ley.foon.tan@intel.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200514170327.31389-7-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport authored
The comment about page table allocation functions resides in include/asm/motorola_pgtable.h while the functions live in include/asm/motorola_pgaloc.h. Move the comment close to the code. Signed-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport authored
All architectures use pXd_index() to get an entry in the page table page corresponding to a virtual address. Align csky with other architectures. Signed-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport authored
The replacement of <asm/pgrable.h> with <linux/pgtable.h> made the include of the latter in the middle of asm includes. Fix this up with the aid of the below script and manual adjustments here and there. import sys import re if len(sys.argv) is not 3: print "USAGE: %s <file> <header>" % (sys.argv[0]) sys.exit(1) hdr_to_move="#include <linux/%s>" % sys.argv[2] moved = False in_hdrs = False with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f: lines = f.readlines() for _line in lines: line = _line.rstrip(' ') if line == hdr_to_move: continue if line.startswith("#include <linux/"): in_hdrs = True elif not moved and in_hdrs: moved = True print hdr_to_move print line Signed-off-by: -
Mike Rapoport authored
The include/linux/pgtable.h is going to be the home of generic page table manipulation functions. Start with moving asm-generic/pgtable.h to include/linux/pgtable.h and make the latter include asm/pgtable.h. Signed-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport authored
Patch series "mm: consolidate definitions of page table accessors", v2. The low level page table accessors (pXY_index(), pXY_offset()) are duplicated across all architectures and sometimes more than once. For instance, we have 31 definition of pgd_offset() for 25 supported architectures. Most of these definitions are actually identical and typically it boils down to, e.g. static inline unsigned long pmd_index(unsigned long address) { return (address >> PMD_SHIFT) & (PTRS_PER_PMD - 1); } static inline pmd_t *pmd_offset(pud_t *pud, unsigned long address) { return (pmd_t *)pud_page_vaddr(*pud) + pmd_index(address); } These definitions can be shared among 90% of the arches provided XYZ_SHIFT, PTRS_PER_XYZ and xyz_page_vaddr() are defined. For architectures that really need a custom version there is always possibility to override the generic version with the usual ifdefs magic. These patches introduce include/linux/pgtable.h that replaces include/asm-generic/pgtable.h and add the definitions of the page table accessors to the new header. This patch (of 12): The linux/mm.h header includes <asm/pgtable.h> to allow inlining of the functions involving page table manipulations, e.g. pte_alloc() and pmd_alloc(). So, there is no point to explicitly include <asm/pgtable.h> in the files that include <linux/mm.h>. The include statements in such cases are remove with a simple loop: for f in $(git grep -l "include <linux/mm.h>") ; do sed -i -e '/include <asm\/pgtable.h>/ d' $f done Signed-off-by: -
Dmitry Safonov authored
Now the last users of show_stack() got converted to use an explicit log level, show_stack_loglvl() can drop it's redundant suffix and become once again well known show_stack(). Signed-off-by:
Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Align the last users of show_stack() by KERN_DEFAULT as the surrounding headers/messages. Signed-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Aligning with other messages printed in sched_show_task() - use KERN_INFO to print the backtrace. Signed-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Print the stack trace with KERN_EMERG - it should be always visible. Playing with console_loglevel is a bad idea as there may be more messages printed than wanted. Also the stack trace might be not printed at all if printk() was deferred and console_loglevel was raised back before the trace got flushed. Unfortunately, after rebasing on commit 2277b492 ("kdb: Fix stack crawling on 'running' CPUs that aren't the master"), kdb_show_stack() uses now kdb_dump_stack_on_cpu(), which for now won't be converted as it uses dump_stack() instead of show_stack(). Convert for now the branch that uses show_stack() and remove console_loglevel exercise from that case. Signed-off-by:
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Acked-by:
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-48-dima@arista.comSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Aligning with other watchdog messages just before panic - use KERN_EMERG. Signed-off-by:
Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-47-dima@arista.comSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
It's under CONFIG_IOMMU_LEAK option which is enabled by debug config. Likely the backtrace is worth to be seen - so aligning with log level of error message in iommu_full(). Signed-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Show the stack trace on a CPU with the same log level as "CPU%d" header. Signed-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to show_trace() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u [rppt@kernel.org: build fix] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200511194534.GA1018386@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Keep log_lvl const show_trace_log_lvl() and printk_stack_address() as the new generic show_stack_loglvl() wants to have a proper const qualifier. And gcc rightfully produces warnings in case it's not keept: arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c: In function `show_stack': arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:294:37: warning: passing argument 4 of `show_trace_log_lv ' discards `const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers] 294 | show_trace_log_lvl(task, NULL, sp, loglvl); | ^~~~~~ arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:163:32: note: expected `char *' but argument is of type `const char *' 163 | unsigned long *stack, char *log_lvl) | ~~~~~~^~~~~~~ [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by: -
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). As a nice side-effect - print backtrace in __die() with the same log level as the rest of function. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level parameter to c_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl() [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
The pmode parameter isn't used in assembly - remove it. Second argument will be reused for printk() log level. Signed-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
`sp' is a needless excercise here. Signed-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by:
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-35-dima@arista.comSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level parameter to show_trace() as a preparation to introduce show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to printk_address() as a preparation to introduce show_stack_loglvl(). As a good side-effect show_fault_oops() now prints the address with KERN_EMREG as the rest of output, making sure there won't be situation where "PC: " is printed without actual address. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently `data' is always an empty line "". No need for additional printk() call. Signed-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to dump_mem() as a preparation to introduce show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by:
-
Dmitry Safonov authored
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#uSigned-off-by:
-
