- 15 Oct, 2013 40 commits
-
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by:
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. This also rearranges the code a bit to make it more sensible. Also removes some unnecessary checks. Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. This driver wasn't setting transition_latency and so is getting set to 0 by default. Lets mark it explicitly by calling the generic routine with transition_latency as 0. Signed-off-by:
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by:
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com> Signed-off-by:
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE will be always enabled when cpufreq framework is used, as cpufreq core depends on it. So, we don't need this CONFIG option anymore as it is not configurable. Remove CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE and update its users. Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many CPUFreq drivers for SMP system (where all cores share same clock lines), do similar stuff in their ->init() part. This patch creates a generic routine in cpufreq core which can be used by these so that we can remove some redundant code. Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Tested-by:
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). And so we don't need to set policy->cur from driver anymore. Over that it sets policy->min and max correctly. They were earlier set to current frequency of CPU but they should be set to max and min freq of cpu. Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
-
