No users outside of core.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Keep status in sync until all users are fixed.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Keep status in sync until all users are fixed.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Keep status in sync until all abusers are fixed.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

No users outside of core.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

No users outside of core.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

We need to maintain the flag for now in both fields status and istate.
Add a CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_COMPAT switch to allow testing w/o
the status one. Wrap the access to status IRQ_INPROGRESS in a inline
which can be turned of with CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_COMPAT along
with the define.

There is no reason that anything outside of core looks at this. That
needs some modifications, but we'll get there.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

No users outside of core.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

No need for a separate function in the core code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

No users outside.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

No users outside of core
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The irq_desc.status field will either go away or renamed to
settings. Anyway we need to maintain compatibility to avoid breaking
the world and some more. While moving bits into the core, I need to
avoid that I use any of the still existing IRQ_ bits in the core code
by typos. So that file will hold the inline wrappers and some nasty
CPP tricks to break the build when typoed.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

That field will contain internal state information which is not going
to be exposed to anything outside the core code - except via accessor
functions. I'm tired of everyone fiddling in irq_desc.status.

core_internal_state__do_not_mess_with_it is clear enough, annoying to
type and easy to grep for. Offenders will be tracked down and slapped
with stinking trouts.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

All archs implement show_interrupts() in more or less the same
way. That's tons of duplicated code with different bugs with no
value. Implement a generic version and deprecate show_interrupts()

Unfortunately we need some ifdeffery for !GENERIC_HARDIRQ archs.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Now that all core users are converted one layer can go.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

It's safe to drop the IRQ_INPROGRESS flag between action chain walks
as we are protected by desc->lock.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Core code replacement for the ugly camel case. It contains all the
code which is shared in all handlers.

     clear status flags
     set INPROGRESS flag
     unlock
     call action chain
     note_interrupt
     lock
     clr INPROGRESS flag
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

IRQ_MASKED is set in mask_ack_irq() anyway. Remove it from
handle_edge_irq() to allow simpler ab^HHreuse of that function.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
LKML-Reference: <20110202212551.918484270@linutronix.de>

Handle IRQ_DISABLED consistent.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Now that everything uses the wrappers, we can remove the default
functions. None of those functions is performance critical.

That makes the IRQ_MASKED flag tracking fully consistent.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Create irq_disable/enable and use them to keep the flags consistent.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Aside of duplicated code some of the startup/shutdown sites do not
handle the MASKED/DISABLED flags and the depth field at all. Move that
to a helper function and take care of it there.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
LKML-Reference: <20110202212551.787481468@linutronix.de>

The if (chip->irq_shutdown) check will always evaluate to true, as we
fill in chip->irq_shutdown with default_shutdown in
irq_chip_set_defaults() if the chip does not provide its own function.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
LKML-Reference: <20110202212551.667607458@linutronix.de>

Soleley used in core code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

With the chip.end() function gone we might run into a situation where
a poll call runs and the real interrupt comes in, sees IRQ_INPROGRESS
and disables the line. That might be a perfect working one, which will
then be masked forever.

So mark them polled while the poll runs. When the real handler sees
IRQ_INPROGRESS it checks the poll flag and waits for the polling to
complete. Add the necessary amount of sanity checks to it to avoid
deadlocks.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

No point in running concurrent pollers which confuse each other by
setting PENDING.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

There is no point in polling disabled lines.

percpu does not make sense at all because we only poll on the cpu
we're currently running on. Also polling per_cpu interrupts is racy as
hell. The handler runs without locking so we might get a huge
surprise.

If the timer interrupt needs polling, then we wont get there anyway.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

try_one_irq() contains redundant code and lots of useless checks for
shared interrupts. Check for shared before setting IRQ_INPROGRESS and
then call handle_IRQ_event() while pending. Shorter version with the
same functionality.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

We run all handlers with interrupts disabled and expect them not to
enable them. Warn when we catch one who does.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

We cannot walk the action chain unlocked. Even if IRQ_INPROGRESS is
set an action can be removed and we follow a null pointer. It's safe
to take the lock there, because the code which removes the action will
call synchronize_irq() which waits unlocked for IRQ_INPROGRESS going
away.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Thread affinity is already set by setup_affinity().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

While rumaging through arch code I found that there are a few
workarounds which deal with the fact that the initial affinity setting
from request_irq() copies the mask into irq_data->affinity before the
chip code is called. In the normal path we unconditionally copy the
mask when the chip code returns 0.

Copy after the code is called and add a return code
IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY for the chip functions, which prevents the
copy. That way we see the real mask when the chip function decided to
truncate it further as some arches do. IRQ_SET_MASK_OK is 0, which is
the current behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

If the affinity had been set by the user, then a later request_irq()
will honour that setting. But online cpus can have changed. So apply
the online mask and for this case as well.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

IRQ_NO_BALANCING is already checked in irq_can_set_affinity() above,
no need to check it again.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>