Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 07 Mar, 2013 3 commits
  3. 05 Mar, 2013 1 commit
  5. 04 Mar, 2013 10 commits
  7. 03 Mar, 2013 1 commit
  9. 01 Mar, 2013 8 commits
  11. 28 Feb, 2013 8 commits
  13. 26 Feb, 2013 6 commits
    • Qu Wenruo's avatar
      btrfs: cleanup for open-coded alignment · fda2832f
      Qu Wenruo authored 
      Though most of the btrfs codes are using ALIGN macro for page alignment,
there are still some codes using open-coded alignment like the
following:
------
        u64 mask = ((u64)root->stripesize - 1);
        u64 ret = (val + mask) & ~mask;
------
Or even hidden one:
------
        num_bytes = (end - start + blocksize) & ~(blocksize - 1);
------

Sometimes these open-coded alignment is not so easy to understand for
newbie like me.

This commit changes the open-coded alignment to the ALIGN macro for a
better readability.

Also there is a previous patch from David Sterba with similar changes,
but the patch is for 3.2 kernel and seems not merged.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg12747.html

Cc: David Sterba <dave@jikos.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      fda2832f
    • Liu Bo's avatar
      Btrfs: do not change inode flags in rename · 8c4ce81e
      Liu Bo authored 
      Before we forced to change a file's NOCOW and COMPRESS flag due to
the parent directory's, but this ends up a bad idea, because it
confuses end users a lot about file's NOCOW status, eg. if someone
change a file to NOCOW via 'chattr' and then rename it in the current
directory which is without NOCOW attribute, the file will lose the
NOCOW flag silently.

This diables 'change flags in rename', so from now on we'll only
inherit flags from the parent directory on creation stage while in
other places we can use 'chattr' to set NOCOW or COMPRESS flags.
Reported-by: default avatarMarios Titas <redneb8888@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      8c4ce81e
    • Liu Bo's avatar
      Btrfs: use reserved space for creating a snapshot · 2382c5cc
      Liu Bo authored 
      While inserting dir index and updating inode for a snapshot, we'd
add delayed items which consume trans->block_rsv, if we don't have
any space reserved in this trans handle, we either just return or
reserve space again.

But before creating pending snapshots during committing transaction,
we've done a release on this trans handle, so we don't have space reserved
in it at this stage.

What we're using is block_rsv of pending snapshots which has already
reserved well enough space for both inserting dir index and updating
inode, so we need to set trans handle to indicate that we have space
now.
Signed-off-by: default avatarLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      2382c5cc
    • Alexandre Oliva's avatar
      clear chunk_alloc flag on retryable failure · a81cb9a2
      Alexandre Oliva authored 
      I've experienced filesystem freezes with permanent spikes in the active
process count for quite a while, particularly on filesystems whose
available raw space has already been fully allocated to chunks.

While looking into this, I found a pretty obvious error in
do_chunk_alloc: it sets space_info->chunk_alloc, but if
btrfs_alloc_chunk returns an error other than ENOSPC, it returns leaving
that flag set, which causes any other threads waiting for
space_info->chunk_alloc to become zero to spin indefinitely.

I haven't double-checked that this patch fixes the failure I've observed
fully (it's not exactly trivial to trigger), but it surely is a bug and
the fix is trivial, so...  Please put it in :-)

What I saw in that function also happens to explain why in some cases I
see filesystems allocate a huge number of chunks that remain unused
(leading to the scenario above, of not having more chunks to allocate).
It happens for data and metadata, but not necessarily both.  I'm
guessing some thread sets the force_alloc flag on the corresponding
space_info, and then several threads trying to get disk space end up
attempting to allocate a new chunk concurrently.  All of them will see
the force_alloc flag and bump their local copy of force up to the level
they see first, and they won't clear it even if another thread succeeds
in allocating a chunk, thus clearing the force flag.  Then each thread
that observed the force flag will, on its turn, force the allocation of
a new chunk.  And any threads that come in while it does that will see
the force flag still set and pick it up, and so on.  This sounds like a
problem to me, but...  what should the correct behavior be?  Clear
force_flag once we copy it to a local force?  Reset force to the
incoming value on every loop?  Set the flag to our incoming force if we
have it at first, clear our local flag, and move it from the space_info
when we determined that we are the thread that's going to perform the
allocation?

btrfs: clear chunk_alloc flag on retryable failure

From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org>

If btrfs_alloc_chunk fails with e.g. ENOMEM, we exit do_chunk_alloc
without clearing chunk_alloc in space_info.  As a result, any further
calls to do_chunk_alloc on that filesystem will start busy-waiting for
chunk_alloc to be cleared, but it never will be.  This patch adjusts
do_chunk_alloc so that it clears this flag in case of an error.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      a81cb9a2
    • Jan Schmidt's avatar
      Btrfs: fix backref walking race with tree deletions · ca60ebfa
      Jan Schmidt authored 
      When a subvolume is removed, we remove the root item from the root tree,
while the tree blocks and backrefs remain for a while. When backref walking
comes across one of those orphan tree blocks, it can find a backref for a
no longer existing root. This is all good, we only must tolerate
__resolve_indirect_ref returning an error and continue with the good refs
found.
Reported-by: default avatarAlex Lyakas <alex.btrfs@zadarastorage.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      ca60ebfa
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: make sure NODATACOW also gets NODATASUM set · f2bdf9a8
      Josef Bacik authored 
      A user reported hitting the BUG_ON() in btrfs_finished_ordered_io() where we had
csums on a NOCOW extent.  This can happen if we have NODATACOW set but not
NODATASUM set, which can happen in two cases, either we mount with -o nodatacow
and then write into preallocated space, or chattr +C a directory and move a file
into that directory.  Liu has fixed the move case in a different place, but this
fixes the mount -o nodatacow case.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      f2bdf9a8
  15. 21 Feb, 2013 2 commits
    • Miao Xie's avatar
      Btrfs: fix remount vs autodefrag · dc81cdc5
      Miao Xie authored 
      If we remount the fs to close the auto defragment or make the fs R/O,
we should stop the auto defragment.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      dc81cdc5
    • Miao Xie's avatar
      Btrfs: fix wrong outstanding_extents when doing DIO write · 172a5049
      Miao Xie authored 
      When running the 083th case of xfstests on the filesystem with
"compress-force=lzo", the following WARNINGs were triggered.
  WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:7908
  WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:7909
  WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:7911
  WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4510
  WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4511

This problem was introduced by the patch "Btrfs: fix deadlock due
to unsubmitted". In this patch, there are two bugs which caused
the above problem.

The 1st one is a off-by-one bug, if the DIO write return 0, it is
also a short write, we need release the reserved space for it. But
we didn't do it in that patch. Fix it by change "ret > 0" to
"ret >= 0".

The 2nd one is ->outstanding_extents was increased twice when
a short write happened. As we know, ->outstanding_extents is
a counter to keep track of the number of extent items we may
use duo to delalloc, when we reserve the free space for a
delalloc write, we assume that the write will introduce just
one extent item, so we increase ->outstanding_extents by 1 at
that time. And then we will increase it every time we split the
write, it is done at the beginning of btrfs_get_blocks_direct().
So when a short write happens, we needn't increase
->outstanding_extents again. But this patch done.

In order to fix the 2nd problem, I re-write the logic for
->outstanding_extents operation. We don't increase it at the
beginning of btrfs_get_blocks_direct(), instead, we just
increase it when the split actually happens.
Reported-by: default avatarMitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      172a5049
  17. 20 Feb, 2013 1 commit
    • Liu Bo's avatar
      Btrfs: snapshot-aware defrag · 38c227d8
      Liu Bo authored 
      This comes from one of btrfs's project ideas,
As we defragment files, we break any sharing from other snapshots.
The balancing code will preserve the sharing, and defrag needs to grow this
as well.

Now we're able to fill the blank with this patch, in which we make full use of
backref walking stuff.

Here is the basic idea,
o  set the writeback ranges started by defragment with flag EXTENT_DEFRAG
o  at endio, after we finish updating fs tree, we use backref walking to find
   all parents of the ranges and re-link them with the new COWed file layout by
   adding corresponding backrefs.
Signed-off-by: default avatarLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      38c227d8
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7