- 28 Nov, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Darrick J. Wong authored
When we're estimating the amount of space it's going to take to satisfy a delalloc reservation, we need to include the space that we might need to grow the rmapbt. This helps us to avoid running out of space later when _iomap_write_allocate needs more space than we reserved. Eryu Guan observed this happening on generic/224 when sunit/swidth were set. Reported-by:
Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
-
Eric Sandeen authored
When XBF_NO_IOACCT got added, it missed the translation in XFS_BUF_FLAGS, so we see "0x8" in trace output rather than the flag name. Fix it. Signed-off-by:
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 24 Nov, 2016 14 commits
-
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
We only ever set a field to this constant for an impossible to reach error case in xfs_bmap_search_extents. That functions has been removed, so we can remove the constant as well. Signed-off-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Now that all users are gone. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
And remove the unused return value. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Use xfs_iext_lookup_extent to look up the extent, drop a useless check, drop a unneeded return value and clean up the general style a little bit. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
And only lookup the previous extent inside xfs_iomap_prealloc_size if we actually need it. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
We can easily lookup the previous extent for the cases where we need it, which saves the callers from looking it up for us later in the series. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Rewrite the function using xfs_iext_lookup_extent and xfs_iext_get_extent, and massage the flow into something easily understandable. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
xfs_iext_lookup_extent looks up a single extent at the passed in offset, and returns the extent covering the area, or the one behind it in case of a hole, as well as the index of the returned extent in arguments, as well as a simple bool as return value that is set to false if no extent could be found because the offset is behind EOF. It is a simpler replacement for xfs_bmap_search_extent that leaves looking up the rarely needed previous extent to the caller and has a nicer calling convention. xfs_iext_get_extent is a helper for iterating over the extent list, it takes an extent index as input, and returns the extent at that index in it's expanded form in an argument if it exists. The actual return value is a bool whether the index is valid or not. Signed-off-by:
-
- 09 Nov, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Brian Foster authored
Filesystem shutdown testing on an older distro kernel has uncovered an imbalanced locking pattern for the inode flush lock in xfs_reclaim_inode(). Specifically, there is a double unlock sequence between the call to xfs_iflush_abort() and xfs_reclaim_inode() at the "reclaim:" label. This actually does not cause obvious problems on current kernels due to the current flush lock implementation. Older kernels use a counting based flush lock mechanism, however, which effectively breaks the lock indefinitely when an already unlocked flush lock is repeatedly unlocked. Though this only currently occurs on filesystem shutdown, it has reproduced the effect of elevating an fs shutdown to a system-wide crash or hang. As it turns out, the flush lock is not actually required for the reclaim logic in xfs_reclaim_inode() because by that time we have already cycled the flush lock once while holding ILOCK_EXCL. Therefore, remove the additional flush lock/unlock cycle around the 'reclaim:' label and update branches into this label to release the flush lock where appropriate. Add an assert to xfs_ifunlock() to help prevent future occurences of the same problem. Reported-by:
Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 08 Nov, 2016 4 commits
-
-
Eric Sandeen authored
The open-coded pattern: ifp->if_bytes / (uint)sizeof(xfs_bmbt_rec_t) is all over the xfs code; provide a new helper xfs_iext_count(ifp) to count the number of inline extents in an inode fork. [dchinner: pick up several missed conversions] Signed-off-by:
-
Eric Sandeen authored
There have been several reports over the years of NULL pointer dereferences in xfs_trans_log_inode during xfs_fsr processes, when the process is doing an fput and tearing down extents on the temporary inode, something like: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000018 PID: 29439 TASK: ffff880550584fa0 CPU: 6 COMMAND: "xfs_fsr" [exception RIP: xfs_trans_log_inode+0x10] #9 [ffff8800a57bbbe0] xfs_bunmapi at ffffffffa037398e [xfs] #10 [ffff8800a57bbce8] xfs_itruncate_extents at ffffffffa0391b29 [xfs] #11 [ffff8800a57bbd88] xfs_inactive_truncate at ffffffffa0391d0c [xfs] #12 [ffff8800a57bbdb8] xfs_inactive at ffffffffa0392508 [xfs] #13 [ffff8800a57bbdd8] xfs_fs_evict_inode at ffffffffa035907e [xfs] #14 [ffff8800a57bbe00] evict at ffffffff811e1b67 #15 [ffff8800a57bbe28] iput at ffffffff811e23a5 #16 [ffff8800a57bbe58] dentry_kill at ffffffff811dcfc8 #17 [ffff8800a57bbe88] dput at ffffffff811dd06c #18 [ffff8800a57bbea8] __fput at ffffffff811c823b #19 [ffff8800a57bbef0] ____fput at ffffffff811c846e #20 [ffff8800a57bbf00] task_work_run at ffffffff81093b27 #21 [ffff8800a57bbf30] do_notify_resume at ffffffff81013b0c #22 [ffff8800a57bbf50] int_signal at ffffffff8161405d As it turns out, this is because the i_itemp pointer, along with the d_ops pointer, has been overwritten with zeros when we tear down the extents during truncate. When the in-core inode fork on the temporary inode used by xfs_fsr was originally set up during the extent swap, we mistakenly looked at di_nextents to determine whether all extents fit inline, but this misses extents generated by speculative preallocation; we should be using if_bytes instead. This mistake corrupts the in-memory inode, and code in xfs_iext_remove_inline eventually gets bad inputs, causing it to memmove and memset incorrect ranges; this became apparent because the two values in ifp->if_u2.if_inline_ext[1] contained what should have been in d_ops and i_itemp; they were memmoved due to incorrect array indexing and then the original locations were zeroed with memset, again due to an array overrun. Fix this by properly using i_df.if_bytes to determine the number of extents, not di_nextents. Thanks to dchinner for looking at this with me and spotting the root cause. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: -
Brian Foster authored
We've had reports of generic/095 causing XFS to BUG() in __xfs_get_blocks() due to the existence of delalloc blocks on a direct I/O read. generic/095 issues a mix of various types of I/O, including direct and memory mapped I/O to a single file. This is clearly not supported behavior and is known to lead to such problems. E.g., the lack of exclusion between the direct I/O and write fault paths means that a write fault can allocate delalloc blocks in a region of a file that was previously a hole after the direct read has attempted to flush/inval the file range, but before it actually reads the block mapping. In turn, the direct read discovers a delalloc extent and cannot proceed. While the appropriate solution here is to not mix direct and memory mapped I/O to the same regions of the same file, the current BUG_ON() behavior is probably overkill as it can crash the entire system. Instead, localize the failure to the I/O in question by returning an error for a direct I/O that cannot be handled safely due to delalloc blocks. Be careful to allow the case of a direct write to post-eof delalloc blocks. This can occur due to speculative preallocation and is safe as post-eof blocks are not accompanied by dirty pages in pagecache (conversely, preallocation within eof must have been zeroed, and thus dirtied, before the inode size could have been increased beyond said blocks). Finally, provide an additional warning if a direct I/O write occurs while the file is memory mapped. This may not catch all problematic scenarios, but provides a hint that some known-to-be-problematic I/O methods are in use. Signed-off-by:
-
Brian Foster authored
The cowblocks background scanner currently clears the cowblocks tag for inodes without any real allocations in the cow fork. This excludes inodes with only delalloc blocks in the cow fork. While we might never expect to clear delalloc blocks from the cow fork in the background scanner, it is not necessarily correct to clear the cowblocks tag from such inodes. For example, if the background scanner happens to process an inode between a buffered write and writeback, the scanner catches the inode in a state after delalloc blocks have been allocated to the cow fork but before the delalloc blocks have been converted to real blocks by writeback. The background scanner then incorrectly clears the cowblocks tag, even if part of the aforementioned delalloc reservation will not be remapped to the data fork (i.e., extra blocks due to the cowextsize hint). This means that any such additional blocks in the cow fork might never be reclaimed by the background scanner and could persist until the inode itself is reclaimed. To address this problem, only skip and clear inodes without any cow fork allocations whatsoever from the background scanner. While we generally do not want to cancel delalloc reservations from the background scanner, the pagecache dirty check following the cowblocks check should prevent that situation. If we do end up with delalloc cow fork blocks without a dirty address space mapping, this is probably an indication that something has gone wrong and the blocks should be reclaimed, as they may never be converted to a real allocation. Signed-off-by:
-
- 24 Oct, 2016 4 commits
-
-
Darrick J. Wong authored
If the deferred ops transaction roll fails, we need to abort the intent items if we haven't already logged a done item for it, regardless of whether or not the deferred ops has had a transaction committed. Dave found this while running generic/388. Move the tracepoint to make it easier to track object lifetimes. Reported-by:
-
Brian Foster authored
The background cowblocks scan job takes care of scanning for inodes with potentially lingering blocks in the cow fork and clearing them out. If the background scanner reclaims the cow fork blocks, however, it doesn't immediately clear the cowblocks tag from the inode. Instead, the inode remains tagged until the background scanner comes around again, discovers the inode cow fork has no blocks, clears the tag and fires the trace_xfs_inode_free_cowblocks_invalid() tracepoint to indicate that the inode may have been incorrectly tagged. This is not a major functional problem as the tag is ultimately cleared. Nonetheless, clear the tag when an inode cow fork is explicitly emptied to avoid the extra round trip through the background scanner and spurious "invalid" tracepoint. Signed-off-by:
-
Brian Foster authored
These calls are still using the eofblocks tracepoints. The cowblocks equivalents are already defined, we just aren't actually calling them. Signed-off-by:
-
Jan Kara authored
iomap_page_mkwrite_actor() calls __block_write_begin_int() with position masked as pos & ~PAGE_MASK which is equivalent to pos & (PAGE_SIZE-1). Thus it masks off high bits of file position. However __block_write_begin_int() expects full file position on input. This does not cause any visible issues because all __block_write_begin_int() really cares about are low file position bits but still it is a bug waiting to happen. Signed-off-by:
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by:
-
- 20 Oct, 2016 15 commits
-
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Since no one uses it anymore. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Instead of doing a full extent list search for each extent that is to be deleted using xfs_bmapi_read and then doing another one inside of xfs_bunmapi_cow use the same scheme that xfs_bumapi uses: look up the last extent to be deleted and then use the extent index to walk downward until we are outside the range to be deleted. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Rewrite xfs_reflink_cancel_cow_blocks so that we only do a search for the first extent in the extent list and then iterate over the remaining extents using the extent index, passing the extent we operate on directly to xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay or xfs_bmap_del_extent_cow instead of going through xfs_bunmapi and doing yet another extent list lookup. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Split out two helpers for deleting delayed or real extents from the COW fork. This allows to call them directly from xfs_reflink_cow_end_io once that function is refactored to iterate the extent tree. It will also allow to reuse the delalloc deletion from xfs_bunmapi in the future. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Instead of reserving space as the first thing in write_begin move it past reading the extent in the data fork. That way we only have to read from the data fork once and can reuse that information for trimming the extent to the shared/unshared boundary. Additionally this allows to easily limit the actual write size to said boundary, and avoid a roundtrip on the ilock. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
There is no need to trim an extent into a shared or non-shared one, or report any flags for plain old reads. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Delalloc extents in the extent list contain the number of reserved indirect blocks in their startblock value and don't use the magic DELAYSTARTBLOCK constant. Ensure that xfs_reflink_trim_around_shared handles them properly by checking for isnullstartblock(). Signed-off-by:
-
Darrick J. Wong authored
This helpers allows to trim an extent to a subset of it's original range while making sure the block numbers in it remain valid, In the future xfs_trim_extent and xfs_bmapi_trim_map should probably be merged in some form. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
This allows the file system to tell a FIEMAP from a read operation, and thus avoids the need to report flags that aren't actually used in the read path. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
There is no clear division of responsibility between those functions, so just merge them into one to keep the code simple. Also move xfs_file_wait_for_io to xfs_reflink.c together with its only caller. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
filemap_write_and_wait_range operates on full pages, so there is no need for the rounding operations. Additionally this allows us to micro-optimize by skipping the second inode_dio_wait for a intra-file clone. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
We need the iolock protection to stabilizie the IS_SWAPFILE and IS_IMMUTABLE values, as well as preventing new buffered writers re-dirtying the file data that we just wrote out. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
The VFS i_ino is an unsigned long, while XFS inode numbers are 64-bit wide, so checking i_ino for equality could lead to rate false positives on 32-bit architectures. Just compare the inode pointers themselves to be safe. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
The VFS already does the check, and the placement of this duplicate is in the way of the following locking rework. Signed-off-by:
-
Roger Willcocks authored
xfs_repair was not detecting that version 3 inodes are invalid for for non-CRC filesystems. The result is specific inode corruptions go undetected and hence aren't repaired if only the version number is out of range. The core of the problem is that the XFS_DINODE_GOOD_VERSION() macro doesn't know that valid inode versions are dependent on a superblock version number. Fix this in libxfs, and propagate the new function out into the rest of xfsprogs to fix the issue. [Darrick: port to kernel from xfsprogs] Reported-by:
Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@mygrande.net> Signed-off-by:
Roger Willcocks <roger@filmlight.ltd.uk> Reviewed-by:
-
