Commit 0174c9f1 authored by unknown's avatar unknown

Bug #28476: force index on a disabled myisam index gives error 124

When processing the USE/FORCE index hints
the optimizer was not checking if the indexes 
specified are enabled (see ALTER TABLE).
Fixed by:
 Backporting the fix for bug 20604 to 5.0


mysql-test/r/key.result:
  Test for BUG 20604.
  The important part of the test is the explain output that 
  tests what indexes are used.
mysql-test/r/myisam.result:
  Bug #28476: test cases
mysql-test/t/key.test:
  Bug 20604: 
  The minimal test case that reveals the bug. The optimizer for 
  aggregates relies on keys disabled with ALTER TABLE ... DISABLE KEYS
  not being in the set TABLE::keys_in_use_for_query.
  When the execution engine tries to use a disabled index, MyISAM
  returns an error.
mysql-test/t/myisam.test:
  Bug #28476: test cases
sql/sql_base.cc:
  Bug #28476: 
   - Ignore disabled indexes in USE/FORCE index
sql/sql_select.cc:
  Bug 20604 : The intersection operation between table->s->keys_in_use 
  and table->keys_in_use_for_query is no longer necessary.
  We can trust that the latter is a subset of the former.
sql/table.h:
  Bug 20604:
  Added comments to TABLE_SHARE::keys_in_use and
  TABLE::keys_in_use_for_query.
parent 7b1fff4e
......@@ -455,3 +455,11 @@ ORDER BY c.b, c.d
a b c d e f g h i j a b c d
2 2 1 2004-11-30 12:00:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 3388000 -553000 NULL
DROP TABLE t1, t2;
CREATE TABLE t1( a TINYINT, KEY(a) ) ENGINE=MyISAM;
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES( 1 );
ALTER TABLE t1 DISABLE KEYS;
EXPLAIN SELECT MAX(a) FROM t1 FORCE INDEX(a);
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 system NULL NULL NULL NULL 1
DROP TABLE t1;
End of 5.0 tests.
......@@ -1780,4 +1780,30 @@ create table t3 (c1 int) engine=myisam pack_keys=default;
create table t4 (c1 int) engine=myisam pack_keys=2;
ERROR 42000: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '2' at line 1
drop table t1, t2, t3;
CREATE TABLE t1(a INT, b INT, KEY inx (a), UNIQUE KEY uinx (b)) ENGINE=MyISAM;
INSERT INTO t1(a,b) VALUES (1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4),(5,5);
SELECT a FROM t1 FORCE INDEX (inx) WHERE a=1;
a
1
ALTER TABLE t1 DISABLE KEYS;
SELECT a FROM t1 FORCE INDEX (inx) WHERE a=1;
a
1
SELECT a FROM t1 USE INDEX (inx) WHERE a=1;
a
1
SELECT b FROM t1 FORCE INDEX (uinx) WHERE b=1;
b
1
SELECT b FROM t1 USE INDEX (uinx) WHERE b=1;
b
1
SELECT a FROM t1 FORCE INDEX (inx,uinx) WHERE a=1;
a
1
ALTER TABLE t1 ENABLE KEYS;
SELECT a FROM t1 FORCE INDEX (inx) WHERE a=1;
a
1
DROP TABLE t1;
End of 5.0 tests
......@@ -432,3 +432,15 @@ ORDER BY c.b, c.d
;
DROP TABLE t1, t2;
#
# Bug #20604: Test for disabled keys with aggregate functions and FORCE INDEX.
#
CREATE TABLE t1( a TINYINT, KEY(a) ) ENGINE=MyISAM;
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES( 1 );
ALTER TABLE t1 DISABLE KEYS;
EXPLAIN SELECT MAX(a) FROM t1 FORCE INDEX(a);
DROP TABLE t1;
--echo End of 5.0 tests.
......@@ -1145,4 +1145,20 @@ create table t3 (c1 int) engine=myisam pack_keys=default;
create table t4 (c1 int) engine=myisam pack_keys=2;
drop table t1, t2, t3;
#
# Bug#28476: force index on a disabled myisam index gives error 124
#
CREATE TABLE t1(a INT, b INT, KEY inx (a), UNIQUE KEY uinx (b)) ENGINE=MyISAM;
INSERT INTO t1(a,b) VALUES (1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4),(5,5);
SELECT a FROM t1 FORCE INDEX (inx) WHERE a=1;
ALTER TABLE t1 DISABLE KEYS;
SELECT a FROM t1 FORCE INDEX (inx) WHERE a=1;
SELECT a FROM t1 USE INDEX (inx) WHERE a=1;
SELECT b FROM t1 FORCE INDEX (uinx) WHERE b=1;
SELECT b FROM t1 USE INDEX (uinx) WHERE b=1;
SELECT a FROM t1 FORCE INDEX (inx,uinx) WHERE a=1;
ALTER TABLE t1 ENABLE KEYS;
SELECT a FROM t1 FORCE INDEX (inx) WHERE a=1;
DROP TABLE t1;
--echo End of 5.0 tests
......@@ -4811,7 +4811,12 @@ bool setup_tables(THD *thd, Name_resolution_context *context,
get_key_map_from_key_list(&map, table, table_list->use_index);
if (map.is_set_all())
DBUG_RETURN(1);
table->keys_in_use_for_query=map;
/*
Don't introduce keys in keys_in_use_for_query that weren't there
before. FORCE/USE INDEX should not add keys, it should only remove
all keys except the key(s) specified in the hint.
*/
table->keys_in_use_for_query.intersect(map);
}
if (table_list->ignore_index)
{
......
......@@ -12246,10 +12246,11 @@ test_if_skip_sort_order(JOIN_TAB *tab,ORDER *order,ha_rows select_limit,
LINT_INIT(ref_key_parts);
/*
Check which keys can be used to resolve ORDER BY.
We must not try to use disabled keys.
Keys disabled by ALTER TABLE ... DISABLE KEYS should have already
been taken into account.
*/
usable_keys= table->s->keys_in_use;
usable_keys= table->keys_in_use_for_query;
DBUG_ASSERT(usable_keys.is_subset(table->s->keys_in_use));
for (ORDER *tmp_order=order; tmp_order ; tmp_order=tmp_order->next)
{
......
......@@ -137,7 +137,12 @@ typedef struct st_table_share
const char *table_name; /* Table name (for open) */
const char *path; /* Path to .frm file (from datadir) */
LEX_STRING connect_string;
key_map keys_in_use; /* Keys in use for table */
/*
Set of keys in use, implemented as a Bitmap.
Excludes keys disabled by ALTER TABLE ... DISABLE KEYS.
*/
key_map keys_in_use;
key_map keys_for_keyread;
ulong avg_row_length; /* create information */
ulong raid_chunksize;
......@@ -206,7 +211,21 @@ struct st_table {
byte *record[2]; /* Pointer to records */
byte *insert_values; /* used by INSERT ... UPDATE */
key_map quick_keys, used_keys, keys_in_use_for_query;
key_map quick_keys, used_keys;
/*
A set of keys that can be used in the query that references this
table
All indexes disabled on the table's TABLE_SHARE (see TABLE::s) will be
subtracted from this set upon instantiation. Thus for any TABLE t it holds
that t.keys_in_use_for_query is a subset of t.s.keys_in_use. Generally we
must not introduce any new keys here (see setup_tables).
The set is implemented as a bitmap.
*/
key_map keys_in_use_for_query;
key_map merge_keys;
KEY *key_info; /* data of keys in database */
Field *next_number_field, /* Set if next_number is activated */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment