Commit 0ae0c133 authored by knielsen@ymer.(none)'s avatar knielsen@ymer.(none)

Bug #33061: ORDER BY DESC becomes ASC in NDB partition pruning to one partition

When partition pruning resulted in an ordered index scan spanning only
one partition, any descending flag for the scan was wrongly discarded,
turning ORDER BY DESC into ORDER BY ASC, and similar problems.

Fixed by correctly passing descending flag in SCAN_TABREQ signal sent
to data nodes.
parent c629bd33
...@@ -38,6 +38,23 @@ a b c ...@@ -38,6 +38,23 @@ a b c
1 10 3 1 10 3
1 11 3 1 11 3
1 12 3 1 12 3
select max(b) from t1 where a = 1;
max(b)
12
select b from t1 where a = 1 order by b desc;
b
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
DROP TABLE t1; DROP TABLE t1;
CREATE TABLE t1 (a INT, b CHAR(10) COLLATE latin1_bin, c INT, d INT, CREATE TABLE t1 (a INT, b CHAR(10) COLLATE latin1_bin, c INT, d INT,
PRIMARY KEY (a,b,c) USING HASH) PRIMARY KEY (a,b,c) USING HASH)
......
...@@ -46,6 +46,14 @@ a b c ...@@ -46,6 +46,14 @@ a b c
1 1 1 1 1 1
6 1 1 6 1 1
10 1 1 10 1 1
INSERT into t1 values (1, 2, 2);
select max(b) from t1 where a = 1;
max(b)
2
select b from t1 where a = 1 order by b desc;
b
2
1
drop table t1; drop table t1;
CREATE TABLE t1 ( CREATE TABLE t1 (
a int not null, a int not null,
......
...@@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ insert into t1 values ...@@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ insert into t1 values
select * from t1 order by b; select * from t1 order by b;
# BUG#33061: ORDER BY DESC becomes ASC in NDB partition pruning to one partition
select max(b) from t1 where a = 1;
select b from t1 where a = 1 order by b desc;
DROP TABLE t1; DROP TABLE t1;
# #
......
...@@ -48,6 +48,11 @@ select * from t1 where a=21 order by a; ...@@ -48,6 +48,11 @@ select * from t1 where a=21 order by a;
select * from t1 where a in (1,6,10,21) order by a; select * from t1 where a in (1,6,10,21) order by a;
select * from t1 where b=1 and a in (1,6,10,21) order by a; select * from t1 where b=1 and a in (1,6,10,21) order by a;
# BUG#33061: ORDER BY DESC becomes ASC in NDB partition pruning to one partition
INSERT into t1 values (1, 2, 2);
select max(b) from t1 where a = 1;
select b from t1 where a = 1 order by b desc;
drop table t1; drop table t1;
# #
......
...@@ -1340,13 +1340,24 @@ NdbIndexScanOperation::readTuples(LockMode lm, ...@@ -1340,13 +1340,24 @@ NdbIndexScanOperation::readTuples(LockMode lm,
if(insertATTRINFO(word) == -1) if(insertATTRINFO(word) == -1)
res = -1; res = -1;
} }
if(!res && order_by){ if (!res)
m_ordered = true; {
/**
* Note that it is valid to have order_desc true and order_by false.
*
* This means that there will be no merge sort among partitions, but
* each partition will still be returned in descending sort order.
*
* This is useful eg. if it is known that the scan spans only one
* partition.
*/
if (order_desc) { if (order_desc) {
m_descending = true; m_descending = true;
ScanTabReq * req = CAST_PTR(ScanTabReq, theSCAN_TABREQ->getDataPtrSend()); ScanTabReq * req = CAST_PTR(ScanTabReq, theSCAN_TABREQ->getDataPtrSend());
ScanTabReq::setDescendingFlag(req->requestInfo, true); ScanTabReq::setDescendingFlag(req->requestInfo, true);
} }
if (order_by) {
m_ordered = true;
Uint32 cnt = m_accessTable->getNoOfColumns() - 1; Uint32 cnt = m_accessTable->getNoOfColumns() - 1;
m_sort_columns = cnt; // -1 for NDB$NODE m_sort_columns = cnt; // -1 for NDB$NODE
m_current_api_receiver = m_sent_receivers_count; m_current_api_receiver = m_sent_receivers_count;
...@@ -1365,6 +1376,7 @@ NdbIndexScanOperation::readTuples(LockMode lm, ...@@ -1365,6 +1376,7 @@ NdbIndexScanOperation::readTuples(LockMode lm,
#endif #endif
} }
} }
}
m_this_bound_start = 0; m_this_bound_start = 0;
m_first_bound_word = theKEYINFOptr; m_first_bound_word = theKEYINFOptr;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment