Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
M
MariaDB
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
nexedi
MariaDB
Commits
1e227b8f
Commit
1e227b8f
authored
Jan 29, 2015
by
Sergei Golubchik
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
clarify the comment and trivial cleanups
parent
267fc6f2
Changes
1
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
12 additions
and
16 deletions
+12
-16
sql/field.h
sql/field.h
+12
-16
No files found.
sql/field.h
View file @
1e227b8f
...
@@ -656,36 +656,32 @@ class Field
...
@@ -656,36 +656,32 @@ class Field
inline
bool
is_null
(
my_ptrdiff_t
row_offset
=
0
)
const
inline
bool
is_null
(
my_ptrdiff_t
row_offset
=
0
)
const
{
{
/*
/*
If the field is NULLable, it returns NULLity based
on null_ptr[row_offset] value. Otherwise it returns
NULL flag depending on TABLE::null_row value.
The table may have been marked as containing only NULL values
The table may have been marked as containing only NULL values
for all fields if it is a NULL-complemented row of an OUTER JOIN
for all fields if it is a NULL-complemented row of an OUTER JOIN
or if the query is an implicitly grouped query (has aggregate
or if the query is an implicitly grouped query (has aggregate
functions but no GROUP BY clause) with no qualifying rows. If
functions but no GROUP BY clause) with no qualifying rows. If
this is the case (in which TABLE::null_row is true) and the
this is the case (in which TABLE::null_row is true), the field
field is not nullable, the field is considered to be NULL.
is considered to be NULL.
Do not change the order of testing. Fields may be associated
with a TABLE object without being part of the current row.
For NULL value check to work for these fields, they must
have a valid null_ptr, and this pointer must be checked before
TABLE::null_row.
Note that if a table->null_row is set then also all null_bits are
Note that if a table->null_row is set then also all null_bits are
set for the row.
set for the row.
In the case of the 'result_field' for GROUP BY, table->null_row might
refer to the *next* row in the table (when the algorithm is: read the
next row, see if any of group column values have changed, send the
result - grouped - row to the client if yes). So, table->null_row might
be wrong, but such a result_field is always nullable (that's defined by
original_field->maybe_null()) and we trust its null bit.
*/
*/
return
real_maybe_null
()
?
return
null_ptr
?
null_ptr
[
row_offset
]
&
null_bit
:
table
->
null_row
;
MY_TEST
(
null_ptr
[
row_offset
]
&
null_bit
)
:
table
->
null_row
;
}
}
inline
bool
is_real_null
(
my_ptrdiff_t
row_offset
=
0
)
const
inline
bool
is_real_null
(
my_ptrdiff_t
row_offset
=
0
)
const
{
return
null_ptr
?
(
null_ptr
[
row_offset
]
&
null_bit
?
1
:
0
)
:
0
;
}
{
return
null_ptr
&&
(
null_ptr
[
row_offset
]
&
null_bit
)
;
}
inline
bool
is_null_in_record
(
const
uchar
*
record
)
const
inline
bool
is_null_in_record
(
const
uchar
*
record
)
const
{
{
if
(
!
null_ptr
)
if
(
!
null_ptr
)
return
0
;
return
0
;
return
MY_TEST
(
record
[(
uint
)
(
null_ptr
-
table
->
record
[
0
])]
&
null_bit
)
;
return
record
[(
uint
)
(
null_ptr
-
table
->
record
[
0
])]
&
null_bit
;
}
}
inline
void
set_null
(
my_ptrdiff_t
row_offset
=
0
)
inline
void
set_null
(
my_ptrdiff_t
row_offset
=
0
)
{
if
(
null_ptr
)
null_ptr
[
row_offset
]
|=
null_bit
;
}
{
if
(
null_ptr
)
null_ptr
[
row_offset
]
|=
null_bit
;
}
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment