Commit 235d0787 authored by unknown's avatar unknown

NDB dbtux scan batch max 16->992 caused perf loss


ndb/src/kernel/blocks/dbtux/Dbtux.hpp:
  dbtux scan batch max 16->992 caused perf loss
ndb/src/kernel/blocks/dbtux/DbtuxScan.cpp:
  dbtux scan batch max 16->992 caused perf loss
ndb/src/kernel/blocks/dbtux/Times.txt:
  dbtux scan batch max 16->992 caused perf loss
ndb/test/ndbapi/testOIBasic.cpp:
  dbtux scan batch max 16->992 caused perf loss
parent abb8268f
......@@ -404,8 +404,6 @@ private:
Uint32 m_savePointId;
// lock waited for or obtained and not yet passed to LQH
Uint32 m_accLockOp;
// locks obtained and passed to LQH but not yet returned by LQH
Uint32 m_accLockOps[MaxAccLockOps];
Uint8 m_readCommitted; // no locking
Uint8 m_lockMode;
Uint8 m_keyInfo;
......@@ -421,6 +419,13 @@ private:
Uint32 nextList;
};
Uint32 prevList;
/*
* Locks obtained and passed to LQH but not yet returned by LQH.
* The max was increased from 16 to 992 (default 64). Record max
* ever used in this scan. TODO fix quadratic behaviour
*/
Uint32 m_maxAccLockOps;
Uint32 m_accLockOps[MaxAccLockOps];
ScanOp(ScanBoundPool& scanBoundPool);
};
typedef Ptr<ScanOp> ScanOpPtr;
......@@ -1028,15 +1033,18 @@ Dbtux::ScanOp::ScanOp(ScanBoundPool& scanBoundPool) :
m_boundMax(scanBoundPool),
m_scanPos(),
m_scanEnt(),
m_nodeScan(RNIL)
m_nodeScan(RNIL),
m_maxAccLockOps(0)
{
m_bound[0] = &m_boundMin;
m_bound[1] = &m_boundMax;
m_boundCnt[0] = 0;
m_boundCnt[1] = 0;
#ifdef VM_TRACE
for (unsigned i = 0; i < MaxAccLockOps; i++) {
m_accLockOps[i] = RNIL;
m_accLockOps[i] = 0x1f1f1f1f;
}
#endif
}
// Dbtux::Index
......
......@@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ Dbtux::scanClose(Signal* signal, ScanOpPtr scanPtr)
ScanOp& scan = *scanPtr.p;
ndbrequire(! scan.m_lockwait && scan.m_accLockOp == RNIL);
// unlock all not unlocked by LQH
for (unsigned i = 0; i < MaxAccLockOps; i++) {
for (unsigned i = 0; i < scan.m_maxAccLockOps; i++) {
if (scan.m_accLockOps[i] != RNIL) {
jam();
AccLockReq* const lockReq = (AccLockReq*)signal->getDataPtrSend();
......@@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ Dbtux::addAccLockOp(ScanOp& scan, Uint32 accLockOp)
ndbrequire(accLockOp != RNIL);
Uint32* list = scan.m_accLockOps;
bool ok = false;
for (unsigned i = 0; i < MaxAccLockOps; i++) {
for (unsigned i = 0; i < scan.m_maxAccLockOps; i++) {
ndbrequire(list[i] != accLockOp);
if (! ok && list[i] == RNIL) {
list[i] = accLockOp;
......@@ -955,6 +955,14 @@ Dbtux::addAccLockOp(ScanOp& scan, Uint32 accLockOp)
// continue check for duplicates
}
}
if (! ok) {
unsigned i = scan.m_maxAccLockOps;
if (i < MaxAccLockOps) {
list[i] = accLockOp;
ok = true;
scan.m_maxAccLockOps = i + 1;
}
}
ndbrequire(ok);
}
......@@ -964,7 +972,7 @@ Dbtux::removeAccLockOp(ScanOp& scan, Uint32 accLockOp)
ndbrequire(accLockOp != RNIL);
Uint32* list = scan.m_accLockOps;
bool ok = false;
for (unsigned i = 0; i < MaxAccLockOps; i++) {
for (unsigned i = 0; i < scan.m_maxAccLockOps; i++) {
if (list[i] == accLockOp) {
list[i] = RNIL;
ok = true;
......
......@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ case c: full scan: index on PK Unsigned
testOIBasic -case v -table 1 -index 1 -fragtype small -threads 10 -rows 100000 -subloop 1 -nologging
case d: scan 1 tuple via EQ: index on PK Unsigned
testOIBasic -case w -table 1 -index 1 -fragtype small -threads 10 -rows 100000 -samples 10000 -subloop 1 -nologging -v2
testOIBasic -case w -table 1 -index 1 -fragtype small -threads 10 -rows 100000 -samples 50000 -subloop 1 -nologging -v2
a, b
1 million rows, pk update without index, pk update with index
......@@ -132,4 +132,12 @@ optim 17 mc02/a 35 ms 52 ms 49 pct
wl-1942 mc02/a 35 ms 52 ms 49 pct
mc02/b 42 ms 75 ms 76 pct
before mc02/c 5 ms 13 ms 126 pct
mc02/d 134 ms 238 ms 78 pct
after mc02/c 5 ms 10 ms 70 pct
mc02/d 178 ms 242 ms 69 pct
[ prelim preformance fix for max batch size 16 -> 992 ]
vim: set et:
......@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct Opt {
unsigned m_samples;
unsigned m_scanbat;
unsigned m_scanpar;
unsigned m_scanstop;
unsigned m_seed;
unsigned m_subloop;
const char* m_table;
......@@ -80,6 +81,7 @@ struct Opt {
m_samples(0),
m_scanbat(0),
m_scanpar(0),
m_scanstop(0),
m_seed(0),
m_subloop(4),
m_table(0),
......@@ -708,6 +710,7 @@ struct Con {
int nextScanResult(bool fetchAllowed, bool& deadlock);
int updateScanTuple(Con& con2);
int deleteScanTuple(Con& con2);
void closeScan();
void closeTransaction();
void printerror(NdbOut& out);
};
......@@ -894,12 +897,22 @@ Con::deleteScanTuple(Con& con2)
return 0;
}
void
Con::closeScan()
{
assert(m_resultset != 0);
m_resultset->close();
m_scanop = 0, m_indexscanop = 0, m_resultset = 0;
}
void
Con::closeTransaction()
{
assert(m_ndb != 0 && m_tx != 0);
m_ndb->closeTransaction(m_tx);
m_tx = 0, m_op = 0;
m_scanop = 0, m_indexscanop = 0, m_resultset = 0;
}
void
......@@ -2538,6 +2551,10 @@ scanupdatetable(Par par)
LL1("scanupdatetable: stop on deadlock");
break;
}
if (par.m_scanstop != 0 && urandom(par.m_scanstop) == 0) {
con.closeScan();
break;
}
do {
unsigned i = (unsigned)-1;
CHK(set2.getkey(par, &i) == 0);
......@@ -2618,6 +2635,10 @@ scanupdateindex(Par par, const ITab& itab, const BSet& bset)
LL1("scanupdateindex: stop on deadlock");
break;
}
if (par.m_scanstop != 0 && urandom(par.m_scanstop) == 0) {
con.closeScan();
break;
}
do {
unsigned i = (unsigned)-1;
CHK(set2.getkey(par, &i) == 0);
......@@ -2782,6 +2803,7 @@ mixedoperations(Par par)
{
par.m_dups = true;
par.m_deadlock = true;
par.m_scanstop = par.m_totrows; // randomly close scans
unsigned sel = urandom(10);
if (sel < 2) {
CHK(pkdelete(par) == 0);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment