Commit 499deca7 authored by Alexander Barkov's avatar Alexander Barkov

A clean-up for c8141f53

MDEV-7950 Item_func::type() takes 0.26% in OLTP RO (Step#2)

- Item_ref was doing unnecessary extra job after the "MDEV-7950 Step#2" patch.
  Fallback to Item::build_equal_items() if real_type() is not FIELD_ITEM.
  Note, Item_ref::build_equal_items() will most likely be further simplified.
  Waiting for Sanja and Igor to check a possibly dead code.

- Safety: Adding Item_sum::build_equal_items() with ASSERT, as Item_sum
  should never appear in build_equal_items() context.
parent 9cdf5c2b
......@@ -3575,6 +3575,22 @@ class Item_ref :public Item_ident
Item *get_tmp_table_item(THD *thd);
table_map used_tables() const;
void update_used_tables();
COND *build_equal_items(THD *thd, COND_EQUAL *inherited,
bool link_item_fields)
{
/*
Item_ref cannot refer to Item_field when build_equal_items() is called,
because all "WHERE/HAVING field" are already replaced to
"WHERE/HAVING field<>0" by this time. See normalize_cond().
TODO: make sure with Igor and Sanja, perhaps the below expression
can be simplified just to a Item::build_equal_items() call.
*/
return real_type() == FIELD_ITEM ?
Item_ident_or_func_or_sum::build_equal_items(thd, inherited,
link_item_fields) :
Item::build_equal_items(thd, inherited,
link_item_fields);
}
bool const_item() const
{
return (*ref)->const_item();
......
......@@ -444,6 +444,17 @@ class Item_sum :public Item_func_or_sum
*/
table_map used_tables() const { return used_tables_cache; }
void update_used_tables ();
COND *build_equal_items(THD *thd, COND_EQUAL *inherited,
bool link_item_fields)
{
/*
Item_sum (and derivants) of the original WHERE/HAVING clauses
should already be replaced to Item_aggregate_ref by the time when
build_equal_items() is called. See Item::split_sum_func2().
*/
DBUG_ASSERT(0);
return Item::build_equal_items(thd, inherited, link_item_fields);
}
bool is_null() { return null_value; }
void make_const ()
{
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment