Commit 4ccf6886 authored by unknown's avatar unknown

BUG#16166, "Can't use index_merge with FORCE INDEX": adjust the heurstics check to take into

account that "FORCE INDEX" disables full table scans, and not range/index_merge scans.
(with post-review fixes)


mysql-test/r/index_merge.result:
  Testcase for BUG#16166
mysql-test/t/index_merge.test:
  Testcase for BUG#16166
sql/sql_select.cc:
  BUG#16166: "Can't use index_merge with FORCE INDEX": adjust the heuristics check:
  if (force-index-is-used && there-is-possible-ref-access && 
  +    THERE IS NO POSSIBLE RANGE/INDEX_MERGE ACCESS)
  {
    ...
parent 3b88de9a
......@@ -384,3 +384,21 @@ max(A.key1 + B.key1 + A.key2 + B.key2 + A.key3 + B.key3 + A.key4 + B.key4 + A.ke
8186
set join_buffer_size= @save_join_buffer_size;
drop table t0, t1, t2, t3, t4;
CREATE TABLE t1 (
cola char(3) not null, colb char(3) not null, filler char(200),
key(cola), key(colb)
);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES ('foo','bar', 'ZZ'),('fuz','baz', 'ZZ');
OPTIMIZE TABLE t1;
Table Op Msg_type Msg_text
test.t1 optimize status OK
select count(*) from t1;
count(*)
8704
explain select * from t1 WHERE cola = 'foo' AND colb = 'bar';
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 index_merge cola,colb cola,colb 3,3 NULL 24 Using intersect(cola,colb); Using where
explain select * from t1 force index(cola,colb) WHERE cola = 'foo' AND colb = 'bar';
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 index_merge cola,colb cola,colb 3,3 NULL 24 Using intersect(cola,colb); Using where
drop table t1;
......@@ -327,3 +327,33 @@ set join_buffer_size= @save_join_buffer_size;
drop table t0, t1, t2, t3, t4;
# BUG#16166
CREATE TABLE t1 (
cola char(3) not null, colb char(3) not null, filler char(200),
key(cola), key(colb)
);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES ('foo','bar', 'ZZ'),('fuz','baz', 'ZZ');
--disable_query_log
let $1=9;
while ($1)
{
eval INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * from t1 WHERE cola = 'foo';
dec $1;
}
let $1=13;
while ($1)
{
eval INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * from t1 WHERE cola <> 'foo';
dec $1;
}
--enable_query_log
OPTIMIZE TABLE t1;
select count(*) from t1;
explain select * from t1 WHERE cola = 'foo' AND colb = 'bar';
explain select * from t1 force index(cola,colb) WHERE cola = 'foo' AND colb = 'bar';
drop table t1;
......@@ -3471,13 +3471,32 @@ best_access_path(JOIN *join,
parts of the row from any of the used index.
This is because table scans uses index and we would not win
anything by using a table scan.
*/
if ((records >= s->found_records || best > s->read_time) &&
!(s->quick && best_key && s->quick->index == best_key->key &&
best_max_key_part >= s->table->quick_key_parts[best_key->key]) &&
!((s->table->file->table_flags() & HA_TABLE_SCAN_ON_INDEX) &&
! s->table->used_keys.is_clear_all() && best_key) &&
!(s->table->force_index && best_key))
A word for word translation of the below if-statement in psergey's
understanding: we check if we should use table scan if:
(1) The found 'ref' access produces more records than a table scan
(or index scan, or quick select), or 'ref' is more expensive than
any of them.
(2) This doesn't hold: the best way to perform table scan is to to perform
'range' access using index IDX, and the best way to perform 'ref'
access is to use the same index IDX, with the same or more key parts.
(note: it is not clear how this rule is/should be extended to
index_merge quick selects)
(3) See above note about InnoDB.
(4) NOT ("FORCE INDEX(...)" is used for table and there is 'ref' access
path, but there is no quick select)
If the condition in the above brackets holds, then the only possible
"table scan" access method is ALL/index (there is no quick select).
Since we have a 'ref' access path, and FORCE INDEX instructs us to
choose it over ALL/index, there is no need to consider a full table
scan.
*/
if ((records >= s->found_records || best > s->read_time) && // (1)
!(s->quick && best_key && s->quick->index == best_key->key && // (2)
best_max_key_part >= s->table->quick_key_parts[best_key->key]) &&// (2)
!((s->table->file->table_flags() & HA_TABLE_SCAN_ON_INDEX) && // (3)
! s->table->used_keys.is_clear_all() && best_key) && // (3)
!(s->table->force_index && best_key && !s->quick)) // (4)
{ // Check full join
ha_rows rnd_records= s->found_records;
/*
......@@ -4460,13 +4479,15 @@ find_best(JOIN *join,table_map rest_tables,uint idx,double record_count,
parts of the row from any of the used index.
This is because table scans uses index and we would not win
anything by using a table scan.
(see comment in best_access_path() for more details on the below
condition)
*/
if ((records >= s->found_records || best > s->read_time) &&
!(s->quick && best_key && s->quick->index == best_key->key &&
best_max_key_part >= s->table->quick_key_parts[best_key->key]) &&
!((s->table->file->table_flags() & HA_TABLE_SCAN_ON_INDEX) &&
! s->table->used_keys.is_clear_all() && best_key) &&
!(s->table->force_index && best_key))
!(s->table->force_index && best_key & !s->quick))
{ // Check full join
ha_rows rnd_records= s->found_records;
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment