Commit 706a7101 authored by Sachin's avatar Sachin

MDEV-23089 rpl_parallel2 fails in 10.5

Problem:- rpl_parallel2 was failing non-deterministically
Analysis:-
When FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK is executed, it will allow all worker
threads to complete their ongoing transactions and then it will pause them.
At this state FTWRL will proceed to acquire global read lock. FTWRL first
blocks threads from starting new commits, then upgrades the lock to block
commit of existing transactions.
  Step1:
    FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK - Blocks new commits
  Step2:
    * STOP SLAVE command enables 'force_abort=1' which unblocks workers,
      they continue to execute events.
    * T1: Waits in 'record_gtid' call to update 'gtid_slave_pos' table with
      its current GTID, but it is blocked becuase of Step1.
    * T2: Holds COMMIT lock and waits for T1 to commit.
  Step3:
    FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK - Waiting to get BLOCK_COMMIT.
This results in deadlock. When STOP SLAVE command allows paused workers to
proceed, workers should skip the execution of all further events, similar
to 'conservative' parallel mode.
Solution:-
We will assign 1 to skip_event_group when we are aborted in do_ftwrl_wait.
rpl_parallel_entry->pause_sub_id is only reset when force_abort is off in
rpl_pause_after_ftwrl.
parent 9840bb21
......@@ -2,8 +2,10 @@ include/rpl_init.inc [topology=1->2]
*** MDEV-5509: Incorrect value for Seconds_Behind_Master if parallel replication ***
connection server_2;
SET @old_parallel_threads=@@GLOBAL.slave_parallel_threads;
set @old_parallel_mode= @@GLOBAL.slave_parallel_mode;
include/stop_slave.inc
SET GLOBAL slave_parallel_threads=5;
set global slave_parallel_mode= optimistic;
include/start_slave.inc
connection server_1;
CREATE TABLE t1 (a INT PRIMARY KEY, b INT);
......@@ -157,6 +159,7 @@ UNLOCK TABLES;
connection server_2;
include/stop_slave.inc
SET GLOBAL slave_parallel_threads=@old_parallel_threads;
set global slave_parallel_mode= @old_parallel_mode;
include/start_slave.inc
connection server_1;
DROP TABLE t1, t2;
......
......@@ -8,8 +8,10 @@
--connection server_2
SET @old_parallel_threads=@@GLOBAL.slave_parallel_threads;
set @old_parallel_mode= @@GLOBAL.slave_parallel_mode;
--source include/stop_slave.inc
SET GLOBAL slave_parallel_threads=5;
set global slave_parallel_mode= optimistic;
--source include/start_slave.inc
--connection server_1
......@@ -219,6 +221,7 @@ UNLOCK TABLES;
--connection server_2
--source include/stop_slave.inc
SET GLOBAL slave_parallel_threads=@old_parallel_threads;
set global slave_parallel_mode= @old_parallel_mode;
--source include/start_slave.inc
--connection server_1
......
......@@ -396,13 +396,14 @@ do_gco_wait(rpl_group_info *rgi, group_commit_orderer *gco,
}
static void
static bool
do_ftwrl_wait(rpl_group_info *rgi,
bool *did_enter_cond, PSI_stage_info *old_stage)
{
THD *thd= rgi->thd;
rpl_parallel_entry *entry= rgi->parallel_entry;
uint64 sub_id= rgi->gtid_sub_id;
bool aborted= false;
DBUG_ENTER("do_ftwrl_wait");
mysql_mutex_assert_owner(&entry->LOCK_parallel_entry);
......@@ -425,7 +426,10 @@ do_ftwrl_wait(rpl_group_info *rgi,
do
{
if (entry->force_abort || rgi->worker_error)
{
aborted= true;
break;
}
if (unlikely(thd->check_killed()))
{
slave_output_error_info(rgi, thd);
......@@ -444,7 +448,7 @@ do_ftwrl_wait(rpl_group_info *rgi,
if (sub_id > entry->largest_started_sub_id)
entry->largest_started_sub_id= sub_id;
DBUG_VOID_RETURN;
DBUG_RETURN(aborted);
}
......@@ -530,6 +534,21 @@ rpl_unpause_after_ftwrl(THD *thd)
mysql_mutex_lock(&e->LOCK_parallel_entry);
rpt->pause_for_ftwrl = false;
mysql_mutex_unlock(&rpt->LOCK_rpl_thread);
/*
Do not change pause_sub_id if force_abort is set.
force_abort is set in case of STOP SLAVE.
Reason: If pause_sub_id is not changed and force_abort_is set,
any parallel slave thread waiting in do_ftwrl_wait() will
on wakeup return from do_ftwrl_wait() with 1. This will set
skip_event_group to 1 in handle_rpl_parallel_thread() and the
parallel thread will abort at once.
If pause_sub_id is changed, the code in handle_rpl_parallel_thread()
would continue to execute the transaction in the queue, which would
cause some transactions to be lost.
*/
if (!e->force_abort)
e->pause_sub_id= (uint64)ULONGLONG_MAX;
mysql_cond_broadcast(&e->COND_parallel_entry);
mysql_mutex_unlock(&e->LOCK_parallel_entry);
......@@ -1222,7 +1241,7 @@ handle_rpl_parallel_thread(void *arg)
rgi->worker_error= 1;
}
if (likely(!skip_event_group))
do_ftwrl_wait(rgi, &did_enter_cond, &old_stage);
skip_event_group= do_ftwrl_wait(rgi, &did_enter_cond, &old_stage);
/*
Register ourself to wait for the previous commit, if we need to do
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment