Commit b5ffdec2 authored by guilhem@mysql.com's avatar guilhem@mysql.com

This is a fix for a bug in 3.23 -> 4.0 replication: Exec_master_log_pos is always

too big by 6 bytes. So I add code to substract 6 bytes if the master is 3.23.
This is not perfect (because it won't work if the slave I/O thread has not
noticed yet that the master is 3.23), but as long as the slave I/O thread
starts Exec_master_log_pos will be ok.
It must be merged to 4.1 but not to 5.0 (or it can be, because of #if MYSQL_VERSION_ID),
because 5.0 already works if the master is 3.23 (and in a more natural way:
in 5.0 we store the end_log_pos in the binlog and relay log).
I had to move functions from slave.h to slave.cc to satisfy gcc.
parent f657ea97
......@@ -1805,10 +1805,21 @@ int Query_log_event::exec_event(struct st_relay_log_info* rli)
position to store is of the END of the current log event.
*/
#if MYSQL_VERSION_ID < 40100
rli->future_master_log_pos= log_pos + get_event_len();
/*
If the event was converted from a 3.23 format, get_event_len() has grown by
6 bytes (at least for most events, except LOAD DATA INFILE which is already
a big problem for 3.23->4.0 replication); 6 bytes is the difference between
the header's size in 4.0 (LOG_EVENT_HEADER_LEN) and the header's size in
3.23 (OLD_HEADER_LEN). Note that using mi->old_format will not help if the
I/O thread has not started yet.
*/
rli->future_master_log_pos= log_pos + get_event_len() -
(rli->mi->old_format ? (LOG_EVENT_HEADER_LEN - OLD_HEADER_LEN) : 0);
#elif MYSQL_VERSION_ID < 50000
rli->future_group_master_log_pos= log_pos + get_event_len();
rli->future_group_master_log_pos= log_pos + get_event_len() -
(rli->mi->old_format ? (LOG_EVENT_HEADER_LEN - OLD_HEADER_LEN) : 0);
#else
/* In 5.0 we store the end_log_pos in the relay log so no problem */
rli->future_group_master_log_pos= log_pos;
#endif
clear_all_errors(thd, rli);
......@@ -1960,9 +1971,11 @@ int Load_log_event::exec_event(NET* net, struct st_relay_log_info* rli,
if (!use_rli_only_for_errors)
{
#if MYSQL_VERSION_ID < 40100
rli->future_master_log_pos= log_pos + get_event_len();
rli->future_master_log_pos= log_pos + get_event_len() -
(rli->mi->old_format ? (LOG_EVENT_HEADER_LEN - OLD_HEADER_LEN) : 0);
#elif MYSQL_VERSION_ID < 50000
rli->future_group_master_log_pos= log_pos + get_event_len();
rli->future_group_master_log_pos= log_pos + get_event_len() -
(rli->mi->old_format ? (LOG_EVENT_HEADER_LEN - OLD_HEADER_LEN) : 0);
#else
rli->future_group_master_log_pos= log_pos;
#endif
......@@ -2133,6 +2146,11 @@ Fatal error running LOAD DATA INFILE on table '%s'. Default database: '%s'",
int Start_log_event::exec_event(struct st_relay_log_info* rli)
{
/*
If the I/O thread has not started, mi->old_format is BINLOG_FORMAT_CURRENT
(that's what the MASTER_INFO constructor does), so the test below is not
perfect at all.
*/
switch (rli->mi->old_format) {
case BINLOG_FORMAT_CURRENT :
/*
......@@ -2427,9 +2445,11 @@ int Execute_load_log_event::exec_event(struct st_relay_log_info* rli)
*/
#if MYSQL_VERSION_ID < 40100
rli->future_master_log_pos= log_pos + get_event_len();
rli->future_master_log_pos= log_pos + get_event_len() -
(rli->mi->old_format ? (LOG_EVENT_HEADER_LEN - OLD_HEADER_LEN) : 0);
#elif MYSQL_VERSION_ID < 50000
rli->future_group_master_log_pos= log_pos + get_event_len();
rli->future_group_master_log_pos= log_pos + get_event_len() -
(rli->mi->old_format ? (LOG_EVENT_HEADER_LEN - OLD_HEADER_LEN) : 0);
#else
rli->future_group_master_log_pos= log_pos;
#endif
......
......@@ -329,6 +329,52 @@ void init_slave_skip_errors(const char* arg)
}
}
void st_relay_log_info::inc_pending(ulonglong val)
{
pending += val;
}
/* TODO: this probably needs to be fixed */
void st_relay_log_info::inc_pos(ulonglong val, ulonglong log_pos, bool skip_lock)
{
if (!skip_lock)
pthread_mutex_lock(&data_lock);
relay_log_pos += val+pending;
pending = 0;
if (log_pos)
#if MYSQL_VERSION_ID < 50000
/*
If the event was converted from a 3.23 format, get_event_len() has
grown by 6 bytes (at least for most events, except LOAD DATA INFILE
which is already a big problem for 3.23->4.0 replication); 6 bytes is
the difference between the header's size in 4.0 (LOG_EVENT_HEADER_LEN)
and the header's size in 3.23 (OLD_HEADER_LEN). Note that using
mi->old_format will not help if the I/O thread has not started yet.
Yes this is a hack but it's just to make 3.23->4.x replication work;
3.23->5.0 replication is working much better.
The line "mi->old_format ? : " below should NOT BE MERGED to 5.0 which
already works. But it SHOULD be merged to 4.1.
*/
master_log_pos= log_pos + val -
(mi->old_format ? (LOG_EVENT_HEADER_LEN - OLD_HEADER_LEN) : 0);
#endif
pthread_cond_broadcast(&data_cond);
if (!skip_lock)
pthread_mutex_unlock(&data_lock);
}
/*
thread safe read of position - not needed if we are in the slave thread,
but required otherwise as var is a longlong
*/
void st_relay_log_info::read_pos(ulonglong& var)
{
pthread_mutex_lock(&data_lock);
var = relay_log_pos;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&data_lock);
}
void st_relay_log_info::close_temporary_tables()
{
TABLE *table,*next;
......
......@@ -210,34 +210,9 @@ typedef struct st_relay_log_info
st_relay_log_info();
~st_relay_log_info();
inline void inc_pending(ulonglong val)
{
pending += val;
}
/* TODO: this probably needs to be fixed */
inline void inc_pos(ulonglong val, ulonglong log_pos, bool skip_lock=0)
{
if (!skip_lock)
pthread_mutex_lock(&data_lock);
relay_log_pos += val+pending;
pending = 0;
if (log_pos)
master_log_pos = log_pos+ val;
pthread_cond_broadcast(&data_cond);
if (!skip_lock)
pthread_mutex_unlock(&data_lock);
}
/*
thread safe read of position - not needed if we are in the slave thread,
but required otherwise as var is a longlong
*/
inline void read_pos(ulonglong& var)
{
pthread_mutex_lock(&data_lock);
var = relay_log_pos;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&data_lock);
}
void inc_pending(ulonglong val);
void inc_pos(ulonglong val, ulonglong log_pos, bool skip_lock=0);
void read_pos(ulonglong& var);
int wait_for_pos(THD* thd, String* log_name, longlong log_pos,
longlong timeout);
void close_temporary_tables();
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment