Bug#48177 - SELECTs with NOT IN subqueries containing NULL

            values return too many records

WHERE clauses with "outer_value_list NOT IN subselect" were
handled incorrectly if the outer value list contained multiple 
items where at least one of these could be NULL. The first 
outer record with NULL value was handled correctly, but if a 
second record with NULL value existed, the optimizer would 
choose to reuse the result it got on the last execution of the 
subselect. This is incorrect if the outer value list has 
multiple items.
     
The fix is to make Item_in_optimizer::val_int (in 
item_cmpfunc.cc) reuse the result of the latest execution
for NULL values only if all values in the outer_value_list 
are NULL.


mysql-test/r/subselect3.result:
  Added test for BUG#48177
mysql-test/t/subselect3.test:
  Added test for BUG#48177
sql/item_cmpfunc.cc:
  Make Item_in_optimizer::val_int (in item_cmpfunc.cc) reuse the result of the latest execution for NULL values only if all values in the outer_value_list are NULL.

mysql-test/r/subselect3.result

@@ -895,3 +895,72 @@ t1.a < (select t4.a+10
 from t4, t5 limit 2));
 ERROR 21000: Subquery returns more than 1 row
 drop table t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5;
+# 
+# BUG#48177 - SELECTs with NOT IN subqueries containing NULL 
+#             values return too many records
+# 
+CREATE TABLE t1 (
+i1 int DEFAULT NULL,
+i2 int DEFAULT NULL
+) ;
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1,    NULL);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (2,    3);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (4,    NULL);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (4,    0);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (NULL, NULL);
+CREATE TABLE t2 (
+i1 int DEFAULT NULL,
+i2 int DEFAULT NULL
+) ;
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (4, NULL);
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (5, 0);
+
+Data in t1
+SELECT i1, i2 FROM t1;
+i1	i2
+1	NULL
+2	3
+4	NULL
+4	0
+NULL	NULL
+
+Data in subquery (should be filtered out)
+SELECT i1, i2 FROM t2 ORDER BY i1;
+i1	i2
+4	NULL
+5	0
+FLUSH STATUS;
+
+SELECT i1, i2
+FROM t1
+WHERE (i1, i2) 
+NOT IN (SELECT i1, i2 FROM t2);
+i1	i2
+1	NULL
+2	3
+
+# Check that the subquery only has to be evaluated once 
+# for all-NULL values even though there are two (NULL,NULL) records
+# Baseline:
+SHOW STATUS LIKE '%Handler_read_rnd_next';
+Variable_name	Value
+Handler_read_rnd_next	17
+
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (NULL, NULL);
+FLUSH STATUS;
+
+SELECT i1, i2
+FROM t1
+WHERE (i1, i2) 
+NOT IN (SELECT i1, i2 FROM t2);
+i1	i2
+1	NULL
+2	3
+
+# Handler_read_rnd_next should be one more than baseline 
+# (read record from t1, but do not read from t2)
+SHOW STATUS LIKE '%Handler_read_rnd_next';
+Variable_name	Value
+Handler_read_rnd_next	18
+DROP TABLE t1,t2;
+End of 5.1 tests

mysql-test/t/subselect3.test

@@ -728,3 +728,69 @@ where
                                   from t4, t5 limit 2));
 
 drop table t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5;
+
+--echo # 
+--echo # BUG#48177 - SELECTs with NOT IN subqueries containing NULL 
+--echo #             values return too many records
+--echo # 
+
+CREATE TABLE t1 (
+  i1 int DEFAULT NULL,
+  i2 int DEFAULT NULL
+) ;
+
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1,    NULL);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (2,    3);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (4,    NULL);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (4,    0);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (NULL, NULL);
+
+CREATE TABLE t2 (
+  i1 int DEFAULT NULL,
+  i2 int DEFAULT NULL
+) ;
+
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (4, NULL);
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (5, 0);
+
+--echo 
+--echo Data in t1
+SELECT i1, i2 FROM t1;
+
+--echo 
+--echo Data in subquery (should be filtered out)
+SELECT i1, i2 FROM t2 ORDER BY i1;
+
+FLUSH STATUS;
+
+--echo 
+SELECT i1, i2
+FROM t1
+WHERE (i1, i2) 
+      NOT IN (SELECT i1, i2 FROM t2);
+
+--echo 
+--echo # Check that the subquery only has to be evaluated once 
+--echo # for all-NULL values even though there are two (NULL,NULL) records
+--echo # Baseline:
+SHOW STATUS LIKE '%Handler_read_rnd_next';
+
+--echo 
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (NULL, NULL); 
+FLUSH STATUS;
+
+--echo 
+SELECT i1, i2
+FROM t1
+WHERE (i1, i2) 
+      NOT IN (SELECT i1, i2 FROM t2);
+
+--echo 
+--echo # Handler_read_rnd_next should be one more than baseline 
+--echo # (read record from t1, but do not read from t2)
+SHOW STATUS LIKE '%Handler_read_rnd_next';
+
+
+DROP TABLE t1,t2;
+
+--echo End of 5.1 tests

sql/item_cmpfunc.cc

@@ -1585,62 +1585,74 @@ longlong Item_in_optimizer::val_int()
   
   if (cache->null_value)
   {
+    /*
+      We're evaluating 
+      "<outer_value_list> [NOT] IN (SELECT <inner_value_list>...)" 
+      where one or more of the outer values is NULL. 
+    */
     if (((Item_in_subselect*)args[1])->is_top_level_item())
     {
       /*
-        We're evaluating "NULL IN (SELECT ...)". The result can be NULL or
-        FALSE, and we can return one instead of another. Just return NULL.
+        We're evaluating a top level item, e.g. 
+	"<outer_value_list> IN (SELECT <inner_value_list>...)",
+	and in this case a NULL value in the outer_value_list means
+        that the result shall be NULL/FALSE (makes no difference for
+        top level items). The cached value is NULL, so just return
+        NULL.
       */
       null_value= 1;
     }
     else
-    {
-      if (!((Item_in_subselect*)args[1])->is_correlated &&
-          result_for_null_param != UNKNOWN)
-      {
-        /* Use cached value from previous execution */
-        null_value= result_for_null_param;
-      }
-      else
     {
       /*
-          We're evaluating "NULL IN (SELECT ...)". The result is:
-             FALSE if SELECT produces an empty set, or
-             NULL  otherwise.
-          We disable the predicates we've pushed down into subselect, run the
-          subselect and see if it has produced any rows.
+	We're evaluating an item where a NULL value in either the
+        outer or inner value list does not automatically mean that we
+        can return NULL/FALSE. An example of such a query is
+        "<outer_value_list> NOT IN (SELECT <inner_value_list>...)" 
+        The result when there is at least one NULL value is: NULL if the
+        SELECT evaluated over the non-NULL values produces at least
+        one row, FALSE otherwise
       */
       Item_in_subselect *item_subs=(Item_in_subselect*)args[1]; 
-        if (cache->cols() == 1)
-        {
-          item_subs->set_cond_guard_var(0, FALSE);
-          (void) args[1]->val_bool_result();
-          result_for_null_param= null_value= !item_subs->engine->no_rows();
-          item_subs->set_cond_guard_var(0, TRUE);
-        }
-        else
-        {
-          uint i;
-          uint ncols= cache->cols();
+      bool all_left_cols_null= true;
+      const uint ncols= cache->cols();
+
       /*
         Turn off the predicates that are based on column compares for
         which the left part is currently NULL
       */
-          for (i= 0; i < ncols; i++)
+      for (uint i= 0; i < ncols; i++)
       {
         if (cache->element_index(i)->null_value)
           item_subs->set_cond_guard_var(i, FALSE);
+        else 
+          all_left_cols_null= false;
       }
 
+      if (!((Item_in_subselect*)args[1])->is_correlated && 
+          all_left_cols_null && result_for_null_param != UNKNOWN)
+      {
+        /* 
+           This is a non-correlated subquery, all values in the outer
+           value list are NULL, and we have already evaluated the
+           subquery for all NULL values: Return the same result we
+           did last time without evaluating the subquery.
+        */
+        null_value= result_for_null_param;
+      } 
+      else 
+      {
+        /* The subquery has to be evaluated */
         (void) args[1]->val_bool_result();
-          result_for_null_param= null_value= !item_subs->engine->no_rows();
+        null_value= !item_subs->engine->no_rows();
+        if (all_left_cols_null)
+          result_for_null_param= null_value;
+      }
 
       /* Turn all predicates back on */
-          for (i= 0; i < ncols; i++)
+      for (uint i= 0; i < ncols; i++)
         item_subs->set_cond_guard_var(i, TRUE);
     }
-      }
-    }
     return 0;
   }
   tmp= args[1]->val_bool_result();