Commit d7a22ed9 authored by Georgi Kodinov's avatar Georgi Kodinov

Bug #44399: crash with statement using TEXT columns, aggregates, GROUP BY,

  and HAVING

When calculating GROUP BY the server caches some expressions. It does
that by allocating a string slot (Item_copy_string) and assigning the 
value of the expression to it. This effectively means that the result
type of the expression can be changed from whatever it was to a string.
As this substitution takes place after the compile-time result type 
calculation for IN but before the run-time type calculations, 
it causes the type calculations in the IN function done at run time 
to get unexpected results different from what was prepared at compile time.

In the CASE ... WHEN ... THEN ... statement there was a similar problem
and it was solved by artificially adding a STRING argument to the matrix
at compile time, so if any of the arguments of the CASE function changes 
its type to a string it will still be covered by the information prepared 
at compile time.
Extended the CASE fix for cover the IN case.
An alternative way of fixing this problem is by caching the result type of 
the arguments at compile time and using the cached information at run time
instead of re-calculating the result types.
Preferred the CASE approach for uniformity and fix localization.

mysql-test/r/func_in.result:
  Bug #44399: test case
mysql-test/t/func_in.test:
  Bug #44399: test case
sql/item_cmpfunc.cc:
  Bug #44399: assume at compile time there's an extra string argument
  in the IN function (similar to CASE) to cater for possible string 
  conversions in the process of calculating the GROUP BY/aggregates.
parent ab99c234
......@@ -587,4 +587,9 @@ SELECT CASE c1 WHEN c1 + 1 THEN 1 END, ABS(AVG(c0)) FROM t1;
CASE c1 WHEN c1 + 1 THEN 1 END ABS(AVG(c0))
NULL 1.0000
DROP TABLE t1;
CREATE TABLE t1(a TEXT);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('iynfj');
SELECT SUM( DISTINCT a ) FROM t1 GROUP BY a HAVING a IN ( AVG( 1 ), 1 + a );
SUM( DISTINCT a )
DROP TABLE t1;
End of 5.1 tests
......@@ -439,4 +439,14 @@ SELECT CASE c1 WHEN c1 + 1 THEN 1 END, ABS(AVG(c0)) FROM t1;
DROP TABLE t1;
#
# Bug #44399: crash with statement using TEXT columns, aggregates, GROUP BY,
# and HAVING
#
CREATE TABLE t1(a TEXT);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('iynfj');
SELECT SUM( DISTINCT a ) FROM t1 GROUP BY a HAVING a IN ( AVG( 1 ), 1 + a );
DROP TABLE t1;
--echo End of 5.1 tests
......@@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ enum_field_types agg_field_type(Item **items, uint nitems)
collect_cmp_types()
items Array of items to collect types from
nitems Number of items in the array
with_sum_func a sum function is referenced
DESCRIPTION
This function collects different result types for comparison of the first
......@@ -199,7 +200,7 @@ enum_field_types agg_field_type(Item **items, uint nitems)
Bitmap of collected types - otherwise
*/
static uint collect_cmp_types(Item **items, uint nitems)
static uint collect_cmp_types(Item **items, uint nitems, my_bool with_sum_func)
{
uint i;
uint found_types;
......@@ -215,6 +216,16 @@ static uint collect_cmp_types(Item **items, uint nitems)
found_types|= 1<< (uint)item_cmp_type(left_result,
items[i]->result_type());
}
if (with_sum_func || current_thd->lex->current_select->group_list.elements)
{
/*
See TODO commentary in the setup_copy_fields function:
item in a group may be wrapped with an Item_copy_string item.
That item has a STRING_RESULT result type, so we need
to take this type into account.
*/
found_types |= (1 << item_cmp_type(left_result, STRING_RESULT));
}
return found_types;
}
......@@ -2722,19 +2733,8 @@ void Item_func_case::fix_length_and_dec()
for (nagg= 0; nagg < ncases/2 ; nagg++)
agg[nagg+1]= args[nagg*2];
nagg++;
if (!(found_types= collect_cmp_types(agg, nagg)))
if (!(found_types= collect_cmp_types(agg, nagg, with_sum_func)))
return;
if (with_sum_func || current_thd->lex->current_select->group_list.elements)
{
/*
See TODO commentary in the setup_copy_fields function:
item in a group may be wrapped with an Item_copy_string item.
That item has a STRING_RESULT result type, so we need
to take this type into account.
*/
found_types |= (1 << item_cmp_type(left_result_type, STRING_RESULT));
}
for (i= 0; i <= (uint)DECIMAL_RESULT; i++)
{
if (found_types & (1 << i) && !cmp_items[i])
......@@ -3525,7 +3525,7 @@ void Item_func_in::fix_length_and_dec()
uint type_cnt= 0, i;
Item_result cmp_type= STRING_RESULT;
left_result_type= args[0]->result_type();
if (!(found_types= collect_cmp_types(args, arg_count)))
if (!(found_types= collect_cmp_types(args, arg_count, with_sum_func)))
return;
for (arg= args + 1, arg_end= args + arg_count; arg != arg_end ; arg++)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment