Commit ef819a1c authored by unknown's avatar unknown

workaround for gcc 2.95.3 bug

anybody knows how to distinguish 2.95.3 from 2.95.4 (which is ok) ?
parent 96699b4d
......@@ -716,6 +716,9 @@ int SQL_SELECT::test_quick_select(THD *thd, key_map keys_to_use,
key++,idx++)
{
ha_rows found_records;
#if defined(__GNUC__) && (__GNUC__ == 2 && __GNUC_MINOR__ == 95) && defined(__OPTIMIZE__)
volatile // gcc 2.95.3 bug in -O3 mode
#endif
double found_read_time;
if (*key)
{
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment