Commit f2215a11 authored by Jimmy Yang's avatar Jimmy Yang

Fix Bug #48026 Log start and end of InnoDB buffer pool initialization

to the error log

rb://513 approved by Sunny Bains
parent 7ade1615
2010-11-10 The InnoDB Team
* dict/dict0dict.c, handler/handler0alter.cc, include/dict0dict.h
row/row0merge.c:
Fix Bug #55084 Innodb crash and corruption after alter table
2010-11-10 The InnoDB Team
* srv/srv0start.c:
......
......@@ -4842,7 +4842,8 @@ void
dict_table_replace_index_in_foreign_list(
/*=====================================*/
dict_table_t* table, /*!< in/out: table */
dict_index_t* index) /*!< in: index to be replaced */
dict_index_t* index, /*!< in: index to be replaced */
const trx_t* trx) /*!< in: transaction handle */
{
dict_foreign_t* foreign;
......@@ -4853,7 +4854,13 @@ dict_table_replace_index_in_foreign_list(
if (foreign->foreign_index == index) {
dict_index_t* new_index
= dict_foreign_find_equiv_index(foreign);
ut_a(new_index);
/* There must exist an alternative index if
check_foreigns (FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS) is on,
since ha_innobase::prepare_drop_index had done
the check before we reach here. */
ut_a(new_index || !trx->check_foreigns);
foreign->foreign_index = new_index;
}
......
......@@ -1012,12 +1012,13 @@ ha_innobase::prepare_drop_index(
index->to_be_dropped = TRUE;
}
/* If FOREIGN_KEY_CHECK = 1 you may not drop an index defined
/* If FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS = 1 you may not drop an index defined
for a foreign key constraint because InnoDB requires that both
tables contain indexes for the constraint. Note that CREATE
INDEX id ON table does a CREATE INDEX and DROP INDEX, and we
can ignore here foreign keys because a new index for the
foreign key has already been created.
tables contain indexes for the constraint. Such index can
be dropped only if FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS is set to 0.
Note that CREATE INDEX id ON table does a CREATE INDEX and
DROP INDEX, and we can ignore here foreign keys because a
new index for the foreign key has already been created.
We check for the foreign key constraints after marking the
candidate indexes for deletion, because when we check for an
......
......@@ -318,7 +318,8 @@ void
dict_table_replace_index_in_foreign_list(
/*=====================================*/
dict_table_t* table, /*!< in/out: table */
dict_index_t* index); /*!< in: index to be replaced */
dict_index_t* index, /*!< in: index to be replaced */
const trx_t* trx); /*!< in: transaction handle */
/*********************************************************************//**
Checks if a index is defined for a foreign key constraint. Index is a part
of a foreign key constraint if the index is referenced by foreign key
......
......@@ -2043,7 +2043,7 @@ row_merge_drop_index(
/* Replace this index with another equivalent index for all
foreign key constraints on this table where this index is used */
dict_table_replace_index_in_foreign_list(table, index);
dict_table_replace_index_in_foreign_list(table, index, trx);
dict_index_remove_from_cache(table, index);
trx->op_info = "";
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment