We have also to test 'conds' even if there was no tables.

(This is because conds may not be a constant)
This bug caused a failure in the test suite for select.test becasue for prepared statements in one case a 'constant sub query' was not regarded as a constant
Sanja will as a separate task check if we can fix that the sub query can be recognized as a constant
Bug #12217


sql/sql_select.cc:
  We have also to test 'conds' even if there was no tables.
  (This is because conds may not be a constant)
  This bug caused a failure in the test suite for select.test becasue for prepared statements in one case a 'constant sub query' was not regarded as a constant
  Sanja will as a separate task check if we can fix that the sub query can be recognized as a constant

sql/sql_select.cc

@@ -1072,7 +1072,14 @@ JOIN::exec()
     else
     {
       result->send_fields(fields_list,1);
-      if (cond_value != Item::COND_FALSE && (!having || having->val_int()))
+      /*
+        We have to test for 'conds' here as the WHERE may not be constant
+        even if we don't have any tables for prepared statements or if
+        conds uses something like 'rand()'.
+      */
+      if (cond_value != Item::COND_FALSE &&
+          (!conds || conds->val_int()) &&
+          (!having || having->val_int()))
       {
 	if (do_send_rows && (procedure ? (procedure->send_row(fields_list) ||
                                           procedure->end_of_records())