From 7798d6195afa62de9424fb99374bdd9253492f2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?=C5=81ukasz=20Nowak?= <luke@nexedi.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:06:22 +0000
Subject: [PATCH]  - corrected comment

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@26760 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
---
 product/ERP5/Document/TradeModelLine.py | 10 +---------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/product/ERP5/Document/TradeModelLine.py b/product/ERP5/Document/TradeModelLine.py
index a2c4be8da1..094462d936 100644
--- a/product/ERP5/Document/TradeModelLine.py
+++ b/product/ERP5/Document/TradeModelLine.py
@@ -94,15 +94,7 @@ class TradeModelLine(Amount):
             # we need to create aggreageted amount on context itself
             movement_list = [context]
           else:
-            # we need to create aggregated amount on context's movements
-            # do not use resources, which use category use
-            # XXX This is not so good - on Invoice with movements having such
-            # resource we shall treat those lines as applying or not?
-            # it would be nice to use:
-            # context.getMovementList(related_resource_use_uid = \
-            #   context.portal_preferences.getPreferredNormalUseUidList())
-            # But getMovementList works with objectValues, do not support
-            # filtering.
+            # XXX: filtering shall be in getMovementList
             movement_list = []
             for movement in context.getMovementList():
               movement_resource = movement.getResourceValue()
-- 
2.30.9