- 26 Jul, 2016 31 commits
-
-
Phil Hughes authored
-
Phil Hughes authored
-
Phil Hughes authored
-
Phil Hughes authored
-
Phil Hughes authored
-
Phil Hughes authored
-
Phil Hughes authored
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Ensure current user can retry a build before showing the 'Retry' button ## What does this MR do? Fixes #20150. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5476
-
Yorick Peterse authored
Add support for using RequestStore within Sidekiq tasks via SIDEKIQ_REQUEST_STORE env variable See merge request !5054
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Add missing escape at line end Documentation fix, pretty simple. See merge request !5422
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Merge branch '20189-markdown-video-doesn-t-work-when-the-referenced-video-file-is-in-same-repo' into 'master' Ensure relative paths for video are rewritten as we do for images ## What does this MR do? This ensures that path to videos are rewritten as we do for images. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? I've decided to add a new `Blob#video?` method for simplicity's sake but this should probably be added to `Gitlab::Git::Blob`. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Fixes #20189. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5474
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Disable MySQL foreign key checks before dropping all tables Fixes #20237. Disables MySQL foreign key checks before dropping all tables in a restore. MySQL doesn't honor `CASCADE` without a special flag when the database/tables are created. In order to drop the tables we need to disable foreign key checks. After the drop, re-enable the key checks. WIP: Pending confirmation from customer that this fix works. See merge request !5472
-
Douwe Maan authored
-
Douwe Maan authored
-
Douwe Maan authored
-
Douwe Maan authored
-
Douwe Maan authored
-
Douwe Maan authored
-
Douwe Maan authored
-
Douwe Maan authored
-
Douwe Maan authored
-
Douwe Maan authored
-
Douwe Maan authored
-
Drew Blessing authored
-
Stan Hu authored
-
Stan Hu authored
This significantly reduces the DB churn in the PostReceive task when it performs reference extraction. See #18663
-
Douwe Maan authored
Added '*.js.es6 gitlab-language=javascript' to .gitattributes ## What does this MR do? According to the branch name this adds the `sytanx` highlighting for `.js.es6` files, but this actually adds the `syntax` highlighting.
😆 ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Is this the right place?🏃 ## Why was this MR needed? We need pretty ES6 diffs. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Flyin' solo🛫 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5486 -
Douwe Maan authored
-
- 25 Jul, 2016 9 commits
-
-
Luke Bennett authored
-
Fatih Acet authored
Fix CI status icon link underline ## What does this MR do? Changes the CSS so that CI status icon does not underline when it is hovered over. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Just need to make sure there aren't any side effects (`.ci-status-link` being used without an icon). To my knowledge, every instance of `.ci-status-link` is tied to a `.ci-status-icon-{statusName}`. ## Why was this MR needed? Resolves existing bug ## What are the relevant issue numbers? #20103 ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5408
-
Clement Ho authored
-
Fatih Acet authored
Fixed dropdown search field height in ie11 ## What does this MR do? Fixes the height of the search input in dropdown menus. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #19684 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-11_at_11.49.52](/uploads/fc25bc3d2c3bbd195f30d1953dc12662/Screen_Shot_2016-07-11_at_11.49.52.png) See merge request !5179
-
Fatih Acet authored
Reduced diff email CSS ## What does this MR do? Reduces the amount of inline CSS on the diff emails. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? #15178 See merge request !5203
-
Fatih Acet authored
Add green outline to New Branch button ## What does this MR do? Add green outline to New Branch button on issue page. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Nope. ## Why was this MR needed? The button was not very visible. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? fixes #18928 ## Screenshots ### Before ![before](/uploads/3bc890e249ef4c3852605a6350c05b9a/before.png) ### After ![after](/uploads/bc627902ffa7c7b4ab20ee7a269fa44f/after.png) See merge request !5447
-
Douwe Maan authored
Add es6 gem ## What does this MR do? Add ES6 to ES5 compiling via Babel and the sprockets es6 gem. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? So we can write ES6 ## What are the relevant issue numbers? https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20098 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-25_at_10.56.02_AM](/uploads/04ceeedb8235fd3a7601bc4bece313a8/Screen_Shot_2016-07-25_at_10.56.02_AM.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-25_at_10.55.54_AM](/uploads/163c46a3d878924ab1717fccca468003/Screen_Shot_2016-07-25_at_10.55.54_AM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5473
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Fix backup restore ## What does this MR do? This MR fixes the backup restore task. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Whether the mode 0277 makes sense. (Group SUID + group/user read/write permissions) ## Why was this MR needed? 86359ec8 broke this, and it was not caught by any specs. Users would see: ``` Restoring repositories ... rake aborted! NameError: undefined local variable or method `repos_path' for #<Backup::Repository:0x00000007cea1d8> /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gitlab-rails/lib/backup/repository.rb:59:in `restore' /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gitlab-rails/lib/tasks/gitlab/backup.rake:79:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>' /opt/gitlab/embedded/service/gitlab-rails/lib/tasks/gitlab/backup.rake:54:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>' Tasks: TOP => gitlab:backup:repo:restore (See full trace by running task with --trace) ``` ## What are the relevant issue numbers? #20188 ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5459
-