An error occurred fetching the project authors.
- 03 Apr, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Sean McGivern authored
1. Never send a pipeline email to anyone other than the user who created the pipeline. 2. Only send pipeline success emails to people with the custom notification setting for enabled. Watchers and participants will never receive this. 3. When custom settings are unset (for new settings and legacy ones), act as if failed_pipeline is set.
-
- 16 Mar, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Tiago Botelho authored
-
Bob Van Landuyt authored
-
- 08 Mar, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
- 06 Mar, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
- 23 Feb, 2017 3 commits
-
-
Douwe Maan authored
This reverts commit cb10b725c8929b8b4460f89c9d96c773af39ba6b.
-
Douwe Maan authored
-
Douwe Maan authored
-
- 15 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
- 14 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
- 13 Feb, 2017 3 commits
-
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
- 26 Jan, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Robert Speicher authored
-
- 18 Jan, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
- 27 Dec, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
- 26 Dec, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Lin Jen-Shin authored
-
- 24 Dec, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
This reverts merge request !8286
-
- 23 Dec, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Lin Jen-Shin authored
Feedback from Grzegorz
-
Lin Jen-Shin authored
The name latest implies that it's reverse chronological, and we did expect it that way. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/25993#note_20429761 > ok, I think markglenfletchera is correct in > https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/support-forum/issues/1394#note_20399939 > that `Project#latest_successful_builds_for` is giving oldest pipeline > rather than latest pipeline. This is a ~regression introduced by !7333 > where `order(id: :desc)` was removed causing this. The offending change > was: > https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/7333/diffs#b22732e5f39e176c7c719fe485847d0fb0564275_92_108 > > The confusion was caused by the `latest` name implication, which > actually didn't order anything, and I think we should add `order(id: > :desc)` to `Ci::Pipeline.latest` otherwise it's confusing that it's not > actually ordered. Closes #25993
-
- 20 Dec, 2016 3 commits
-
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
- 15 Dec, 2016 2 commits
-
- 14 Dec, 2016 1 commit
- 12 Dec, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
[ci skip]
-
- 06 Dec, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
- 05 Dec, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Grzegorz Bizon authored
-
- 01 Dec, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robert Speicher authored
-
- 22 Nov, 2016 3 commits
-
- 21 Nov, 2016 3 commits
-
-
Lin Jen-Shin authored
Fixes #24677
- 19 Nov, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-