- 22 Mar, 2016 9 commits
-
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
It will protect against storing truncated data.
-
Alain Takoudjou authored
If 2 lines have the same effective date (catalog has a 1 second precision), always return the validate and open first. Commit: 02d06501 Changes applied from history: http://git.erp5.org/gitweb/erp5.git/history/refs/heads/interaction-drop:/product/ERP5/Document/SubscriptionItem.py?js=1
-
Alain Takoudjou authored
Original commit from : Lukasz Nowak <luke@nexedi.com> 3e45ec35
-
Alain Takoudjou authored
From Lukasz Nowak: 1- Compensation is undesired. (51c8a250) Raise loudly with message. 2- Disallow any compensation. (3c74ed07) 3- Emit more informative log. (534b2e77)
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
Also minimise activity hurricane by calling expand directly. Open Orders are searched using indexation timestamp, which allows to see them in "windows", and does not repeat expand if not needed. Generate activities and allow to pass the tag. Use search and activate everywhere which will allow to walk through objects without killing the cluster even in case of really big documents. Avoid calling isDivergent which can take few minutes to finish. causality_state comes from well designed causality workflow, which informs enough about delivery state. Fetching causality_state property is extremely fast.
-
Julien Muchembled authored
Notes: Do nothing on 'calculate' instead of disabling *_causality_interaction_workflow as these interaction workflows do not generate activities directly, and do work that can't be postponed. By contrast, 'calculate' transition of delivery_causality_workflow is modified so that no 'updateCausalityState' activity is created by default. This commit also update list of method_id which should not call calculate_causality
-
Romain Courteaud authored
Conflicts: bt5/erp5_crm/bt/revision
-
Romain Courteaud authored
- Acquire subordination from parent Computer: Thanks to this Computer Partitions can be in same category as Computers they are contained in. - Computer should acquire region from parent. - Add group acquisition on Computer Partition
-
Georgios Dagkakis authored
-
- 21 Mar, 2016 9 commits
-
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
getOwner returns a python document.
-
Romain Courteaud authored
Only support Base_jumpToRelatedObject for now.
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
- 19 Mar, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Georgios Dagkakis authored
fix the keys adding 'portal_type_workflow_chain/' in _importFile, preinstall and export." This reverts commit 6f8221b6. This commit cleaned inconsistent prefix manipulation in PortalTypeWorkflowChainTemplateItem. It passes the test suite, however it was found to produce incompatibility with previously installed business templates. In 'Upgrade Business Templates from Repositories" there was a diff of PortalTypeWorkflowChainTemplateItems like: Portal Type Name -> New portal_type_workflow_chain/Portal Type Name -> Removed For some reason the upgrade process would remove the chain without adding the new element. We are working on a clean solution, but since this needs more testing I revert this commit for now so that master version does not cause problems to users.
-
- 18 Mar, 2016 8 commits
-
-
Cédric Le Ninivin authored
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
Sebastien Robin authored
parameters "develop = false" and "revision =" are now set every time
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Georgios Dagkakis authored
-
Georgios Dagkakis authored
fix the keys adding 'portal_type_workflow_chain/' in _importFile, preinstall and export.
-
- 17 Mar, 2016 8 commits
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
ReportSections are rendered as 'embedded' forms. As selections are not used in erp5js, any python code (TALES expresssion for example) accessing them will not return the expected value. Such code should probably be rewritten (no idea how yet).
-
Boris Kocherov authored
Add Semaphore functionality on adding Log to history. Implementation of Delivery Receipt sending. Delivery Receipt hadnling is not implemented yet. http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0184.html clients which support xep-0184 adnroid: https://conversations.im/ https://www.xabber.com/ linux: http://psi-plus.com/ /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!76
-
Georgios Dagkakis authored
business templates were brought to previous format, removing 'portal_type_workflow_chain/' prefix
-
Georgios Dagkakis authored
remove 'portal_type_workflow_chain/' from the keys in export. This is added in _importFile and in build the key becomes the portal type So if the business_template was exported without being built there was a diff.
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
Portal Type as Classes: Fix memory leak: Workflow method list was never emptied and thus reset Workflow Methods were never GC.
-
Boris Kocherov authored
-
- 16 Mar, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Boris Kocherov authored
Implementation of Delivery Receipt sending. Delivery Receipt hadnling is not implemented yet. http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0184.html clients which support xep-0184 adnroid: https://conversations.im/ https://www.xabber.com/ linux: http://psi-plus.com/
-
Boris Kocherov authored
it save from message loss.
-
- 15 Mar, 2016 3 commits
-
-
Tristan Cavelier authored
This change allows easily track if some test suite has enough test nodes to run or not. /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!78
-
Cédric Le Ninivin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
After that change, when there is a movement from A to B in **started** state, `Item_getCurrentSiteValue` will consider that this movement has already reached B. Before this change, `Item_getCurrentSiteValue` was returning None, which somehow makes sense because started movement is in transit state, so the item has left A but not yet reached B, so it is in an unknown location. Low level current tracking list API ( getCurrentTrackingList ) does not return items for started movements. Honestly, I do not know if this is by design. ( anybody knows ? ) I will work on adding missing tests, but please tell me if I am wrong in thinking it should return None. @gabriel @rafael @tb @tc do you remember why this change was introduced ? Maybe that behaviour of returning None should be only at the level of `Item_get*` scripts ? /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!70
-