Notify the user and redirect to the storage page to force user to enter credentials if needed

This fixes the issue that a transaction with many big messages failed to
commit. By dynamically find the maximum allowed size of a query, it also
speeds up insertion by minimizing the number of queries.

This moves the remaining DTML queries to Python, dropping the 'activity' skin.

Dealing with conflicts of uids is easier if the inserted uids are consecutive:
now, only 1 random value is generated, as base uid. This also preserves the
order of insertion, which is wanted for performance reasons:
- No more random write in the primary index.
- When modifying several lines of several documents, 1 document being processed
  at a time, we'd like that any grouped activity (usually indexation) follows
  the same order, so that a processing node prefer many lines from a few
  documents instead of mixing lines from too many documents at the same time.
  This is usually better for caches.

Average age of activities is dropped because it would become
too complicated to implement and it's useless information.

The original goal was to improve performance by removing the
`processing_node_processing` index and the queries that modified
these 2 useless columns.

The root call to getExecutableMessageList (i.e. the one from distribute)
is fast enough and won't hold old revisions of the database for too long.
It is also completely read-only so it won't lock anything.

This caused useless communication with the server.

As shown in the following example, on a big catalog table,
MariaDB is able to use several indices at the same time
('...' are obfuscated unique values):

  > analyze select SQL_NO_CACHE uid, relative_url from catalog where reference='...' OR relative_url='...';
  +------+-------------+---------+-------------+------------------------+------------------------+---------+------+------+--------+----------+------------+--------------------------------------------------+
  | id   | select_type | table   | type        | possible_keys          | key                    | key_len | ref  | rows | r_rows | filtered | r_filtered | Extra                                            |
  +------+-------------+---------+-------------+------------------------+------------------------+---------+------+------+--------+----------+------------+--------------------------------------------------+
  |    1 | SIMPLE      | catalog | index_merge | Reference,relative_url | Reference,relative_url | 768,767 | NULL |    2 |   2.00 |   100.00 |     100.00 | Using union(Reference,relative_url); Using where |
  +------+-------------+---------+-------------+------------------------+------------------------+---------+------+------+--------+----------+------------+--------------------------------------------------+
  1 row in set (0.00 sec)

So mixing different dependency types with OR should be fine
(no need to split into more subqueries and join with UNION).

only covers interface compliance and high level parts of sending

User triggering action to send SMS does not have view permission on
Gateway

after using Base_setDefaultSecurity to initialize security

Implementation dependant parameters, such as message type or quality,
must be defined by the gateway class, not in the common
ShortMessage_send script.

This should make it easier to switch implementations.

Also:
 * send method is expected to be called once per recipient. I guess we
   prefer to isolate messages than to batch send messages efficiently.
 * send method expect relative url of sender and reciever documents, so
   that it can decide which properties to use.
 * drop `sender_title` parameter, now the gateway implementation decide
   what to use.
 * drop `test` parameter. For simulation mode, set simulation mode on
   the gateway instance
 * sms.send() no longer accept direct from_url / to_url / body message.
   It only supports sending what's defined on document properties.
 * SMSTool_afterSend will be called with message_id parameter, not
   message_id_list
 * Split interfaces in two SMS Sending / SMS Receiving.

- fix message_type to support multitext messages
- use MULTITEXT message type by default

Only mobyt support this parameter, so this break the compatibility with
essendex

The fields are displayed only if some portal types are configured as
member of payment_request group. This means that currently it's not
displayed by default.

e84d2b51 introduced template_{interface,mixin}_id BusinessTemplate properties
in erp5_property_sheets without keeping backward compatibility and thus
preventing update:
  Module Products.ERP5.Tool.TemplateTool, line 1446, in upgradeSite
    update_catalog=update_catalog)
  Module Products.ERP5.Tool.TemplateTool, line 1289, in updateBusinessTemplateFromUrl
    imported_bt5 = self.download(url = download_url, id = id)
  Module Products.ERP5.Tool.TemplateTool, line 382, in download
    bt = self._download_local(path, id)
  Module Products.ERP5.Tool.TemplateTool, line 328, in _download_local
    bt.importFile(path)
  Module Products.ERP5.Document.BusinessTemplate, line 5887, in importFile
    self.storeTemplateItemData()
  Module Products.ERP5.Document.BusinessTemplate, line 5165, in storeTemplateItemData
    InterfaceTemplateItem(self.getTemplateInterfaceIdList())
AttributeError: getTemplateInterfaceIdList

ZODB Components: Likewise Document, add Mixin (erp5.component.mixin) and Interface (erp5.component.interface).

* One Mixin/Interface class per ZODB Component.
  => Already the case for FS Mixin, not for Interfaces.
* ZODB Components module name ('reference' property) and class name:
  + Mixin: FooMixin.
  + Interface: IFoo.

Rationale:
  + Avoid current FS hacks: registry (Mixins, mixin_class_registry) or import
    all classes explicitly in __init__.py (Products.ERP5Type.interfaces).
  + Consistent naming.
  + Consistent with ZODB Documents Components.

Also, modify pylint checker to handle Zope Interfaces:
  + E: 4, 0: Inheriting 'Interface', which is not a class. (inherit-non-class)
  + E: 5, 2: Method has no argument (no-method-argument)

Follow nexedi/erp5@1664e541

It seems developpers didn't update their instances.

Creating a Software Publication doesn't require to change the Software Product.