Fix Issue 19641 (new snippets style bug)

## What does this MR do?
Fixes Issue 19641 (new snippets style bug)

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Shouldn't be

## Why was this MR needed?
Requested in issue 19641 by Fatih Acet https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19641

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
19641

## Screenshots (if relevant)
![Screenshot_2016-07-09_13.25.39](/uploads/8ead7ea8f4aae7ccaa4d2ddc495b6fe3/Screenshot_2016-07-09_13.25.39.png)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
Yes

- [ x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ NA] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ NA] API support added
- Tests
  - [NA ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ X] All builds are passing
- [X ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !5170

Allow to disable user request access to groups/projects

fixes #18585 

![projects](/uploads/9f381e77ffbcd2ecdbabdb8b201b95e4/projects.png)  

![namespaces](/uploads/4b8d39c80576b499118373f0a221882c/namespaces.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !5286

Add predefined CI variables to GitLab

## What does this MR do?
This adds predefined CI variables to GitLab for container registry, pipelines, project name, etc. It also makes sure that all currently documented variables are send from GitLab. This is added to follow up on this proposal: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner/issues/185#note_11844286. To migrate almost all variables out of Runner to GitLab to simplify adding a new of variables without the need for changing the GitLab Runner.

## Why was this MR needed?
Our CI variables miss a lot of crucial information that should be easily accessible. This tries to fill this gap.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner/issues/185, https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18164, https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18075.

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)


See merge request !4826

Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>

Updated fork page UI

## What does this MR do?

Updates fork page to new UI.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

😕 

## Why was this MR needed?

'coz new forks page looks awesome, that's why!

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #17810.

## Screenshots (if relevant)

![Screen_Shot_2016-07-07_at_03.43.45](/uploads/d4be046d1a6b043f3691633b7ec396c6/Screen_Shot_2016-07-07_at_03.43.45.png)

[youtube video](https://youtu.be/YpXPCxWGCnY)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !5007

Replace namespace-specific application.js files with namespace-bundle.js files.

Following up on the per-page JavaScript improvements, I wanted to replace the use of `application.js` with `namespace-bundle.js` to prevent confusion when downloading more than one application.js file.

This is pretty much just for the sake of clarity.

cc: @alfredo1 

See merge request !5221

Log cron_jobs configuration instead of raising exception

## What does this MR do?

Log cron_jobs configuration errors and remove invalid key <-> values from the configuration hash instead of raising an exception.
This has been discussed at #20010.

Fixes #20010

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

## Why was this MR needed?

Original implementation !5318, introduced a regression with our docker packaging: #20010.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

* #20010 
* #18378

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !5360

speed up ExternalWikiService#get_project_wiki_path

## What does this MR do?

Speed up ExternalWikiHelper#get_project_wiki_path

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

## Why was this MR needed?

See issue #19886 

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

#19886 

## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !5305

Fix migration corrupting import data for old version upgrades

Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19073

Not a fan of changing old migrations but this will prevent issues from upgrading GitLab version 8.6 or older to 8.10

More details of the issue on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19073#note_13190450

See merge request !5358

Merge branch '20003-newnoteworker-failing-repeatedly-with-argumenterror-wrong-number-of-arguments' into 'master'

Ensure to_json methods take optional argument

If only Ruby had static checking for interfaces like this 😀 

Closes #20003.

See merge request !5359

Expire tags/branches repo cache before delete a repository

## What does this MR do?

Explicitly expire tag and branch cache data before deleting a repository. Those keys don't depend on git data when they are expired

## Why was this MR needed?

To solve an existing problem https://sentry.gitlap.com/gitlab/gitlabcom/issues/8756/

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #20011

## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- ~~[ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- ~~[ ] API support added~~
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !5356

Replace parse_boolean with to_boolean

## What does this MR do?

Replaces `.parse_boolean` with the new `.to_boolean` as we talked in the other MR.

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

~~- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added~~

~~- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~

~~- [ ] API support added~~
- Tests

  ~~- [ ] Added for this feature/bug~~
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !5355

Fix the Sentry spam from CSP violations by disabling it.

## What does this MR do?

Leaves CSP enabled, but without a reporting endpoint for now. This was causing a huge amount of useless errors in our Sentry instance.

cc: @stanhu 

See merge request !5354

Fixed GFM autocomplete not loading on wiki pages

## What does this MR do?

Allows the GFM autocomplete to work on wiki pages.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #19580 

See merge request !5132

Fix build duration when build is not finished yet

## What does this MR do?

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

## Why was this MR needed?

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Fixes #19937.

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] No CHANGELOG since it fixes a regression not yet in a stable release (I think)
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !5323

Limit git rev-list output count to one in forced push check

## What does this MR do?
It adds `--max-count=1` to the git command used to check for forced push, this way we can have a brief yet indicative output, saving some time used to split the string returned.

Credits go to @pacoguzman for pointing me to the command option.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Don't think so.

## Why was this MR needed?
It could allow for faster check of forced pushes.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/14280#note_13177575

## Screenshots (if relevant)
N/A

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [ ] ~~API support added~~
- ~~Tests~~
  - [ ] ~~Added for this feature/bug~~
  - [ ] ~~All builds are passing~~
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] ~~[Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)~~

See merge request !5352

Ensure Owners are included in the scope for authorized_projects

Prior, when providing a `min_access_level` parameter to this method, we
called `Gitlab::Access.values` instead of `all_values`, mistakenly
omitting the `OWNER` level.

Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19878

See merge request !5353

Prior, when providing a `min_access_level` parameter to this method, we
called `Gitlab::Access.values` instead of `all_values`, mistakenly
omitting the `OWNER` level.

Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19878

Add new CI status icons

## What does this MR do?
Adds new CI status icons for every state

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #19847 

## Screenshots (if relevant)
![Screen_Shot_2016-07-19_at_6.58.37_AM](/uploads/ec391b59825f5a4a228d7c77e7485b1e/Screen_Shot_2016-07-19_at_6.58.37_AM.png)


See merge request !5280

upgrade rouge to 2.0.5

## What does this MR do?
Upgrades Rouge to 2.0.5

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No

## Why was this MR needed?
New lexers and bugfixes from upstream.

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !5351

Remove white background on clipboard button; position icon

## What does this MR do?
Removes white background from clipboard button

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #19098 

## Screenshots (if relevant)
![Screen_Shot_2016-07-18_at_3.12.24_PM](/uploads/4a6a540e1a074e6cf89fb99be1b49f2d/Screen_Shot_2016-07-18_at_3.12.24_PM.png)
![Screen_Shot_2016-07-18_at_8.50.55_PM](/uploads/8c594b6f9a74095b194fe1f634eaf226/Screen_Shot_2016-07-18_at_8.50.55_PM.png)

See merge request !5335

Fix styling of tag page

## What does this MR do?
Fixes tag page UI

## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:    
![Screen_Shot_2016-07-18_at_3.09.28_PM](/uploads/575776fe7917321307baf2b8c2b34d75/Screen_Shot_2016-07-18_at_3.09.28_PM.png)
After:    
![Screen_Shot_2016-07-18_at_3.09.08_PM](/uploads/44f905318c01eb094989cb74bcd4c3c1/Screen_Shot_2016-07-18_at_3.09.08_PM.png)

See merge request !5334

New fork icon!

## What does this MR do?
We are using the old fork icon for branching only, so this implements our new custom fork icon

## Screenshots (if relevant)
![Screen_Shot_2016-07-15_at_9.22.33_AM](/uploads/05abaffff314e41f582189327bcca6b2/Screen_Shot_2016-07-15_at_9.22.33_AM.png)     
![Screen_Shot_2016-07-15_at_9.29.14_AM](/uploads/a08c622c92da00945406bbd4b3497749/Screen_Shot_2016-07-15_at_9.29.14_AM.png)

cc @hazelyang 

See merge request !5276