Commit 3c7e491b authored by Robert Griesemer's avatar Robert Griesemer

go/types: add debugging code to detect use of incomplete interfaces

The comment for phase 2 of checker.interfaceType (typexpr.go:517)
requires that embedded interfaces be complete for correctness of
the algorithm.

Yet, the very next comment (typexpr.go:530) states that underlying
embedded interfaces may in fact be incomplete.

This is in fact the case and the underlying bug in issue #18395.

This change makes sure that new interface types are marked complete
when finished (per the implicit definition in Interface.Complete,
type.go:302). It also adds a check, enabled in debug mode only, to
detect the use of incomplete embedded interfaces during construction
of a new interface. In debug mode, this check fails for the testcase
in the issue (and several others).

This change has no noticeable impact with debug mode disabled.

For #18395.

Change-Id: Ibb81e47257651282fb3755a80a36ab5d392e636d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/78955Reviewed-by: default avatarAlan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
parent 4aac23cc
......@@ -540,6 +540,10 @@ func (check *Checker) interfaceType(iface *Interface, ityp *ast.InterfaceType, d
}
iface.embeddeds = append(iface.embeddeds, named)
// collect embedded methods
if debug && embed.allMethods == nil {
check.dump("%s: incomplete embedded interface %s", pos, named)
unreachable()
}
for _, m := range embed.allMethods {
if check.declareInSet(&mset, pos, m) {
iface.allMethods = append(iface.allMethods, m)
......@@ -579,7 +583,11 @@ func (check *Checker) interfaceType(iface *Interface, ityp *ast.InterfaceType, d
// claim source order in the future. Revisit.
sort.Sort(byUniqueTypeName(iface.embeddeds))
sort.Sort(byUniqueMethodName(iface.allMethods))
if iface.allMethods == nil {
iface.allMethods = make([]*Func, 0) // mark interface as complete
} else {
sort.Sort(byUniqueMethodName(iface.allMethods))
}
}
// byUniqueTypeName named type lists can be sorted by their unique type names.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment