Commit 578e2815 authored by Cezar Sa Espinola's avatar Cezar Sa Espinola Committed by Brad Fitzpatrick

[release-branch.go1.12] net: use network and host as singleflight key during lookupIP

In CL 120215 the cgo resolver was changed to have different logic based
on the network being queried. However, the singleflight cache key wasn't
updated to also include the network. This way it was possible for
concurrent queries to return the result for the wrong network.

This CL changes the key to include both network and host, fixing the
problem.

Fixes #31062

Change-Id: I8b41b0ce1d9a02d18876c43e347654312eba22fc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/166037Reviewed-by: default avatarBrad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarIan Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
(cherry picked from commit e341bae0)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170320
Run-TryBot: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
parent 8acc2ea6
......@@ -262,8 +262,9 @@ func (r *Resolver) lookupIPAddr(ctx context.Context, network, host string) ([]IP
// only the values in context. See Issue 28600.
lookupGroupCtx, lookupGroupCancel := context.WithCancel(withUnexpiredValuesPreserved(ctx))
lookupKey := network + "\000" + host
dnsWaitGroup.Add(1)
ch, called := r.getLookupGroup().DoChan(host, func() (interface{}, error) {
ch, called := r.getLookupGroup().DoChan(lookupKey, func() (interface{}, error) {
defer dnsWaitGroup.Done()
return testHookLookupIP(lookupGroupCtx, resolverFunc, network, host)
})
......@@ -280,7 +281,7 @@ func (r *Resolver) lookupIPAddr(ctx context.Context, network, host string) ([]IP
// let the lookup continue uncanceled, and let later
// lookups with the same key share the result.
// See issues 8602, 20703, 22724.
if r.getLookupGroup().ForgetUnshared(host) {
if r.getLookupGroup().ForgetUnshared(lookupKey) {
lookupGroupCancel()
} else {
go func() {
......
......@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ import (
"sort"
"strings"
"sync"
"sync/atomic"
"testing"
"time"
)
......@@ -1093,6 +1094,69 @@ func TestLookupIPAddrPreservesContextValues(t *testing.T) {
}
}
// Issue 30521: The lookup group should call the resolver for each network.
func TestLookupIPAddrConcurrentCallsForNetworks(t *testing.T) {
origTestHookLookupIP := testHookLookupIP
defer func() { testHookLookupIP = origTestHookLookupIP }()
queries := [][]string{
{"udp", "golang.org"},
{"udp4", "golang.org"},
{"udp6", "golang.org"},
{"udp", "golang.org"},
{"udp", "golang.org"},
}
results := map[[2]string][]IPAddr{
{"udp", "golang.org"}: {
{IP: IPv4(127, 0, 0, 1)},
{IP: IPv6loopback},
},
{"udp4", "golang.org"}: {
{IP: IPv4(127, 0, 0, 1)},
},
{"udp6", "golang.org"}: {
{IP: IPv6loopback},
},
}
calls := int32(0)
waitCh := make(chan struct{})
testHookLookupIP = func(ctx context.Context, fn func(context.Context, string, string) ([]IPAddr, error), network, host string) ([]IPAddr, error) {
// We'll block until this is called one time for each different
// expected result. This will ensure that the lookup group would wait
// for the existing call if it was to be reused.
if atomic.AddInt32(&calls, 1) == int32(len(results)) {
close(waitCh)
}
select {
case <-waitCh:
case <-ctx.Done():
return nil, ctx.Err()
}
return results[[2]string{network, host}], nil
}
ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), 10*time.Second)
defer cancel()
wg := sync.WaitGroup{}
for _, q := range queries {
network := q[0]
host := q[1]
wg.Add(1)
go func() {
defer wg.Done()
gotIPs, err := DefaultResolver.lookupIPAddr(ctx, network, host)
if err != nil {
t.Errorf("lookupIPAddr(%v, %v): unexpected error: %v", network, host, err)
}
wantIPs := results[[2]string{network, host}]
if !reflect.DeepEqual(gotIPs, wantIPs) {
t.Errorf("lookupIPAddr(%v, %v): mismatched IPAddr results\n\tGot: %v\n\tWant: %v", network, host, gotIPs, wantIPs)
}
}()
}
wg.Wait()
}
func TestWithUnexpiredValuesPreserved(t *testing.T) {
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment