Commit 6dbaf035 authored by Robert Griesemer's avatar Robert Griesemer

go/types: better cycle reporting for some cyclic composite literals

To evaluate the type of composite literals, the type checker called
Checker.typ which breaks cycles. As a result, certain cycles were
not reported with actual cycle reporting, but caught due to other
uninitialized fields (with less nice error message).

The change now calls Checker.typExpr at the relevant call site.

For #18643.

Change-Id: Iecb3f0e1afb4585b85553b6c581212f52ac3a1c4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/115456Reviewed-by: default avatarAlan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
parent 462c182c
......@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ func (check *Checker) builtin(x *operand, call *ast.CallExpr, id builtinId) (_ b
}
}
if mode == invalid {
if mode == invalid && typ != Typ[Invalid] {
check.invalidArg(x.pos(), "%s for %s", x, bin.name)
return
}
......
......@@ -1064,7 +1064,7 @@ func (check *Checker) exprInternal(x *operand, e ast.Expr, hint Type) exprKind {
break
}
}
typ = check.typ(e.Type)
typ = check.typExpr(e.Type, nil, nil)
base = typ
case hint != nil:
......
......@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ type (
// test cases for issue 18643
// (type cycle detection when non-type expressions are involved)
type (
T14 [len(T14 /* ERROR cycle */ {})]int
T14 /* ERROR cycle */ [len(T14{})]int
T15 [][len(T15 /* ERROR cycle */ {})]int
T16 map[[len(T16 /* ERROR cycle */ {1:2})]int]int
T17 map[int][len(T17 /* ERROR cycle */ {1:2})]int
......
......@@ -161,6 +161,11 @@ func (check *Checker) typExpr(e ast.Expr, def *Named, path []*TypeName) (T Type)
return
}
// typ is like typExpr (with a nil argument for the def parameter),
// but typ breaks type cycles. It should be called for components of
// types that break cycles, such as pointer base types, slice or map
// element types, etc. See the comment in typExpr for details.
//
func (check *Checker) typ(e ast.Expr) Type {
// typExpr is called with a nil path indicating an indirection:
// push indir sentinel on object path
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment