Commit d8e8fc29 authored by Austin Clements's avatar Austin Clements

runtime/internal/atomic: remove write barrier from Storep1 on s390x

atomic.Storep1 is not supposed to invoke a write barrier (that's what
atomicstorep is for), but currently does on s390x. This causes a panic
in runtime.mapzero when it tries to use atomic.Storep1 to store what's
actually a scalar.

Fix this by eliminating the write barrier from atomic.Storep1 on
s390x. Also add some documentation to atomicstorep to explain the
difference between these.

Fixes #15270.

Change-Id: I291846732d82f090a218df3ef6351180aff54e81
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21993Reviewed-by: default avatarBrad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMichael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
parent 6b85a45e
......@@ -15,10 +15,9 @@ import (
// escape analysis decisions about the pointer value being stored.
// Instead, these are wrappers around the actual atomics (casp1 and so on)
// that use noescape to convey which arguments do not escape.
//
// Additionally, these functions must update the shadow heap for
// write barrier checking.
// atomicstorep performs *ptr = new atomically and invokes a write barrier.
//
//go:nosplit
func atomicstorep(ptr unsafe.Pointer, new unsafe.Pointer) {
atomic.Storep1(noescape(ptr), new)
......
......@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ func Store64(ptr *uint64, val uint64) {
//go:noinline
//go:nosplit
func Storep1(ptr unsafe.Pointer, val unsafe.Pointer) {
*(*unsafe.Pointer)(ptr) = val
*(*uintptr)(ptr) = uintptr(val)
}
//go:noescape
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment