The current description refers to the outermost "frame" which can be
misleading. A user reading it can think it means a stack frame.

Change-Id: Ie2c7cb4b4db8f41572df206478ce3b46a0245a5d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47850Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>

When a local variable is moved to the heap the declaration position
should be preserved so that later on we can assign it to the correct
DW_TAG_lexical_block.

Fixes #20959

Change-Id: I3700ef53c68ccd506d0633f11374ad88a52b2898
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47852
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>

ld.addpltsym adds an R_X86_64_JMP_SLOT dynamic relocation to .rela.plt
and uses Addaddrplus to reference the GOT in Elf64_Rela.r_offset.

Addaddrplus results in an R_ADDR relocation, which here we transform
into an R_X86_64_64 dynamic relocation. This is wrong for several
reasons:

1. .rela.plt is not a writable, relro section. It is mapped read-only,
   causing the dynamic linker to segfault when it tried to handle the
   relocation. This was the immediate cause of internal PIE cgo
   crashes.

2. Relocations targetting other reloc sections are, as far as I can
   tell, undefined behavior in the ELF spec and are unlikely to be a
   good idea.

3. Even if the relocation did work, it isn't what we want. The
   relocation, if successfully handled, would have put an absolute
   address as the JMP_SLOT offset, but it should be the offset from the
   beginning of the binary, just like any other relocation. What we want
   is a statically resolved R_ADDR relocation, just as is used below for
   the R_X86_64_64 relocation.

Skipping the .rela.plt allows reloc() to handle these R_ADDR
relocations.

With this CL, internal PIE cgo binaries work.

Updates #18968

Change-Id: Ie74e6fe249e88150baa0e340b1cb128cf7f28673
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47837Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>

On a slow or distracted machine, 0.1s is sometimes
not long enough for a non-blocking function call to complete.
This causes rare test flakes.
They can be easily reproduced by reducing the wait time to (say) 100ns.

For non-blocking functions, increase the window from 100ms to 10s.
Using different windows for block and non-blocking functions,
allows us to reduce the time for blocking functions.
The risk here is false negatives, but that risk is low;
this test is run repeatedly on many fast machines,
for which 10ms is ample time.
This reduces the time required to run the test by a factor of 10,
from ~1s to ~100ms.

Fixes #20299

Change-Id: Ice9a641a66c6c101d738a2ebe1bcb144ae3c9916
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47812
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>

Currently, sysmon waits 60 ms during idle before relaxing. This is
primarily to avoid reducing the precision of short-duration timers. Of
course, if there are no short-duration timers, this wastes 60 ms
running the timer at high resolution.

Improve this by instead inspecting the time until the next timer fires
and relaxing the timer resolution immediately if the next timer won't
fire for a while.

Updates #20937.

Change-Id: If4ad0a565b65a9b3e8c4cdc2eff1486968c79f24
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47833
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>

Currently, sysmon relaxes the Windows timer resolution as soon as the
Go process becomes idle. However, if it's going idle because of a
short sleep (< 15.6 ms), this can turn that short sleep into a long
sleep (15.6 ms).

To address this, wait for 60 ms of idleness before relaxing the timer
resolution. It would be better to check the time until the next wakeup
and relax immediately if it makes sense, but there's currently no
interaction between sysmon and the timer subsystem, so adding this
simple delay is a much simpler and safer change for late in the
release cycle.

Fixes #20937.

Change-Id: I817db24c3bdfa06dba04b7bc197cfd554363c379
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47832
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>

This reverts commit 168eb9cf.

CL 47831 fixes the issue with plugins on ARMv5, so we can re-enable the test.

Updates #19674.

Change-Id: Idcb29f93ffb0460413f1fab5bb82fa2605795038
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47834Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>

R11 is callee-save in the C ABI, but the temporary register in the Go
ABI. Currently it's being clobbered by runtime.addmoduledata, which
has to follow the C ABI. The observed effect of this was that
dl_open_worker was returning to a bad PC because after it failed to
restore its SP because it was using R11 as a frame pointer.

Fix this by saving R11 around addmoduledata.

Fixes #19674.

Change-Id: Iaacbcc76809a3aa536e9897770831dcbcb6c8245
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47831
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>

Change-Id: If1c602176e0bea66924983eab8edd5e450228b68
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47792Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>

A lot of code that uses runtime.Callers makes assumptions about the
result that are not true today under gccgo and will not be true in the
future in gc. This adds a section to the release notes discussing how
to correctly use runtime.Callers.

Change-Id: I96b7c7ef183cee2061442fc3501fceceefa54c09
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47691Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>

Change-Id: I1c02aa4f7131ae984fda66b32e8a993c0a40b8f4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47690Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>

Fixes #20930

Change-Id: I4a59de0556cffeae9af2eaa41609601e086211b2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47731Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>

Fixes #20928

Change-Id: I7f7aafb8ff4b5deb50c286a9ae81c34ee85e56a9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47730Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>

CL 47341 added support for decoding non-padded messages. But DecodedLen
still returned a multiple of 5 for messages without a padding, even
though it is possible to calculate the len exactly when using NoPadding.

This change makes DecodedLen return the exact number of bytes that
will be written. A change to the decoding logic is also made so that it
can handle this case.

DecodedLen now has the same behaviour as DecodedLen in encoding/base64.

Fixes #20854

Change-Id: I729e0b1c0946c866fb675c854f835f366dd4b5a4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47710Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>

It already implied that Cmd.Wait is more than os.Process.Wait, but say
so explicitly.

See https://github.com/golang/go/issues/18874#issuecomment-309921486

Updates #18874

Change-Id: Iaa46defd776ae0be817d9f4466a99ac78cfd672b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47650Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>

CL 38634 added support for custom (and disabled) padding characters
when encoding, but didn't update the decoding paths. This adds
decoding support.

Fixes #20854

Change-Id: I9fb1a0aaebb27f1204c9f726a780d5784eb71024
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47341
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>

Currently only the rwmutex write lock prevents descheduling. The read
lock does not. This leads to the following situation:

1. A reader acquires the lock and gets descheduled.

2. GOMAXPROCS writers attempt to acquire the lock (or at least one
writer does, followed by readers). This blocks all of the Ps.

3. There is no 3. The descheduled reader never gets to run again
because there are no Ps, so it never releases the lock and the system
deadlocks.

Fix this by preventing descheduling while holding the read lock. This
requires also rewriting TestParallelRWMutexReaders to always create
enough GOMAXPROCS and to use non-blocking operations for
synchronization.

Fixes #20903.

Change-Id: Ibd460663a7e5a555be5490e13b2eaaa295fac39f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47632
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>

Change-Id: If5495f66d175bdacebd599abf1e064d2343669c2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34430
Run-TryBot: Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>

ResolveTCPAddr, ResolveUDPAddr, and ResolveIPAddr return at most one
address. When given a name like "golang.org" to resolve that might
have more than 1 address, the net package has historically preferred
IPv4 addresses, with the assumption that many users don't yet have
IPv6 connectivity and randomly selecting between an IPv4 address and
an IPv6 address at runtime wouldn't be a good experience for IPv4-only
users.

In CL 45088 (78cf0e56) I modified the resolution of the
unspecified/empty address to internally resolve to both IPv6 "::" and
0.0.0.0 to fix issue #18806.

That code has 3 other callers I hadn't considered, though: the
Resolve*Addr functions. Since they preferred IPv4, any Resolve*Addr of
"[::]:port" or "::" (for ResolveIPAddr) would internally resolve both
"::" and 0.0.0.0 and then prefer 0.0.0.0, even though the user was
looking up an IPv6 literal.

Add tests and fix it, not by undoing the fix to #18806 but by
selecting the preference function for Resolve*Addr more explicitly: we
still prefer IPv4, but if the address being looked up was an IPv6
literal, prefer IPv6.

The tests are skipped on machines without IPv6.

Fixes #20911

Change-Id: Ib7036cc43182ae4118cd1390c254e17c04a251a3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47554
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>

Updates #20587

Change-Id: Ie4846f90611390eebf037ffafaed5ddd273565e4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47551Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>

The text before CL 45816 was:

	-timeout t
		If a test runs longer than t, panic.
		The default is 10 minutes (10m).

CL 45816 was supposed to be about clarifying test vs test binary,
and it did add the clarification of referring to "duration d",
but it also introduced incorrect text about timeout 0.

The new text in this CL preserves the good change and
eliminates the incorrect one:

	-timeout d
		If a test binary runs longer than duration d, panic.
		The default is 10 minutes (10m).

For #14780.

Change-Id: I4f79d6e48ed9295bc9f34a36aa90d3b03b40d7f5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47571
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>

Following the spec clarification in CL 40393, copy that text
to reflect docs to state that the initial capacity of MakeMapWithSize
is a hint/approximate.

Fixes #19903

Change-Id: I6b3315b8183cafaa61fbb2839a4e42b76fd71544
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46270Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>

Fixes #20876

Change-Id: Ic62c4f59e3ddcae891aa9526f9693d233dd524fc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47552Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>

Fixes #20894

Change-Id: I0c0e906964bbd789317d07f245e64e3d61ecfa8c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47550Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>

Go 1.9 beta 2 is already out.
It's too late to break code with a change like this.
This can be rolled forward for Go 1.10.

This reverts commit ae238688.

Change-Id: Ib67b8629e3deac5d50d76581aba6a91ca7a7853e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47570Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>

The name LabelList was changed to LabelSet during the development of the
proposal [1], except in one function comment. This commit fixes that.

Fixes #20905.

[1] https://github.com/golang/go/issues/17280

Change-Id: Id4f48d59d7d513fa24b2e42795c2baa5ceb78f36
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47470Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>

Change-Id: Idf89559c9945c5a8743539658fe92e860fcc6a92
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47362Reviewed-by: Matt Layher <mdlayher@gmail.com>

mheap.allocLarge just calls bestFitTreap and is the only caller of
bestFitTreap. Flatten these into a single function. Also fix their
comments: allocLarge claims to return exactly npages but can in fact
return a larger span, and h.freelarge is not in fact indexed by span
start address.

Change-Id: Ia20112bdc46643a501ea82ea77c58596bc96f125
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47315
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>

The Server struct has exported fields, which allows users to manually
create a Server object without using using NewServer or NewTLSServer
and directly call Start or StartTLS on their object.

In order to ensure that manual creation of Server works, the
NewUnstartedServer function should not initialize Server in any way
that the user was not able to do themselves. For example, the setting
of a unexported filed, client, is not something a user can do.
Thus, rather than setting the client field in NewUnstartedServer,
we lazily initialize it when Start or StartTLS is called.

Otherwise, the Server logic can nil panic later when it assumes that this
field has been initialized.

Fixes #20871

Change-Id: I65c6a9f893ea963b0fbad0990b33af08007c1140
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47353Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>

The Func type has allowed calling the Func.Name method on a nil pointer
since Go1.2, where it returned an empty string. A regression caused by
CL/37331 caused this behavior to change. This breaks code that lazily
does runtime.FuncForPC(myPtr).Name() without first checking that myPtr
is actually non-nil.

Fixes #20872

Change-Id: Iae9a2ebabca5e9d1f5a2cdaf2f30e9c6198fec4f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47354Reviewed-by: Marvin Stenger <marvin.stenger94@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>

Change-Id: I4417c5a8537095a6464ce919b2e5cb250e179939
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47332Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>

Wrong instructions "MOVW 8(F0), R1" and "MOVW R0<<0(F1), R1"
are silently accepted, and all Fx are treated as Rx.

The patch checks all those illegal base registers.

fixes #20724

Change-Id: I05d41bb43fe774b023205163b7daf4a846e9dc88
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46132
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>

If a retryable error such as EAGAIN/EINTR is encountered during a call
to sendfile(), we should not assume that a partial write occurred.
Instead, just like any other platform, we should always try again even
if 0 bytes were written.

Fixes #20857

Change-Id: I9aa48d193c27c6794c550320da4d3f7544041f37
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47351
Run-TryBot: Shawn Walker-Salas <shawn.walker@oracle.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>

The current code calculates register number incorrectly.

The fix corrects the register number calculation.

Add cases created by decoder to test assembler.

Fixes #20697
Fixes #20723

Change-Id: I73ac153df9ea9f51c43a5104828d7a5389551c92
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45850
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>

Now that ReadMemStats is fast (CL 34937), CL 36791 is not so
necessary, and causes confusion. See #20863

This was already partially reverted in CL 46612 but missed two of the
spots.

Fixes #20863

Change-Id: I1307a0f7b1f9e86e8b6ceaa6a677f24f13431110
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47350Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>

Fixes #20834.

Change-Id: Ic60000db6b8ae489a5cedbdc938d9ca1dc34c6d4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47151Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>

Updates #18581
Updates #20858

Change-Id: I6b5ce0e255a42c028d46815fff5a5aca68690fd9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47254
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>

Fixes #20839.

Change-Id: I125460c5da09b7fa0cf470ff5be436f8d650cde7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47253
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>

Document that the byte value returned by ReadByte() is meaningless
if its error != nil. Because io.Reader and io.ByteReader are similar in
name, this CL aims to clear up any ambiguity surrounding the returned
values, particularly where io.Reader is allowed to return both a
non-zero number of valid bytes and err == EOF.

Fixes #20825

Change-Id: I3a23c18c80c471c0caae3b4d2f6f8e547da0bed9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46950Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>

FreeBSD 9.3.
Add Linux arm64. (required second line)
Clarify glibc requirement now that we have second line in notes.
OS X to macOS

Updates #20850

Change-Id: I684d464ed32a072081726b7c805a346c22c42f97
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47252Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>