- 26 Oct, 2019 10 commits
-
-
Ben Shi authored
ARM's R4-R8 & R10-R11 are callee-save registers, and R9 may be callee-save or not. This CL saves them at the beginning of sigtramp and restores them in the end. fixes #32738 Change-Id: Ib7eb80836bc074e2e6a46ae4602ba8a3b96c5456 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/183777Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
Austin Clements authored
For #10958, #24543. Change-Id: Ib009a83fe02bc623894f4908fe8f6b266382ba95 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201404 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
Austin Clements authored
For #10958, #24543. Change-Id: I82bee63b49e15bd5a53228eb85179814c80437ef Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201403 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
Austin Clements authored
For these, we split up the existing runtime.raise assembly implementation into its constituent "get thread ID" and "signal thread" parts. This lets us implement signalM and reimplement raise in pure Go. (NetBSD conveniently already had lwp_self.) We also change minit to store the procid directly, rather than depending on newosproc to do so. This is because newosproc isn't called for the bootstrap M, but we need a procid for every M. This is also simpler overall. For #10958, #24543. Change-Id: Ie5f1fcada6a33046375066bcbe054d1f784d39c0 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201402 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
Austin Clements authored
We'll add a test once all of the POSIX platforms are done. For #10958, #24543. Change-Id: If7e3f14e8391791364877629bf415d9f8e788b0a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201401 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
Vivek V authored
Change-Id: I8dcb425c37a067277549ba3bda6a21206459890a GitHub-Last-Rev: dc51b9b425ca51cd0a4ac494d4c7a3c0e2306951 GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#35132 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/203097 Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
Bryan C. Mills authored
Previously we injected an error, and the injection points were (empirically) not realistic on some platforms. Instead, we now make the directory read-only, which (on most platforms) suffices to prevent the removal of its files. Fixes #35117 Updates #29921 Change-Id: Ica4e2818566f8c14df3eed7c3b8de5c0abeb6963 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/203502Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Cuong Manh Le authored
findObject takes the pointer argument as uintptr. If the pointer is to the local stack and calling findObject happens to require the stack to be reallocated, then spanOf is called for the old pointer. Marking findObject as nosplit fixes the issue. Fixes #35068 Change-Id: I029d36f9c23f91812f18f98839edf02e0ba4082e Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/202798 Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-
Cuong Manh Le authored
This helps keeping findObject's frame small. Updates #35068 Change-Id: I1b8c1fcc5831944c86f1a30ed2f2d867a5f2b242 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/202797 Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-
Cuong Manh Le authored
Factor out case s == nil, make the code cleaner and easier to read. Change-Id: I63f52e14351c0a0d20a611b1fe10fdc0d4947d96 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/202498 Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
-
- 25 Oct, 2019 22 commits
-
-
Austin Clements authored
We check whether an M is preemptible in a surprising number of places. Put it in one function. For #10958, #24543. Change-Id: I305090fdb1ea7f7a55ffe25851c1e35012d0d06c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201439 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
Austin Clements authored
We're about to introduce asynchronous safe points, where we won't have precise pointer maps for all stack frames. That's okay for scanning the stack (conservatively), but not for shrinking the stack. Hence, this CL prepares for this by only shrinking the stack as part of the stack scan if the goroutine is stopped at a synchronous safe point. Otherwise, it queues up the stack shrink for the next synchronous safe point. We already have one condition under which we can't shrink the stack for very similar reasons: syscalls. Currently, we just give up on shrinking the stack if it's in a syscall. But with this mechanism, we defer that stack shrink until the next synchronous safe point. For #10958, #24543. Change-Id: Ifa1dec6f33fdf30f9067be2ce3f7ab8a7f62ce38 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201438 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
Austin Clements authored
When we copy a stack of a goroutine blocked in a channel operation, we have to be very careful because other goroutines may be writing to that goroutine's stack. To handle this, stack copying acquires the locks for the channels a goroutine is waiting on. One complication is that stack growth may happen while a goroutine holds these locks, in which case stack copying must *not* acquire these locks because that would self-deadlock. Currently, stack growth never acquires these locks because stack growth only happens when a goroutine is running, which means it's either not blocking on a channel or it's holding the channel locks already. Stack shrinking always acquires these locks because shrinking happens asynchronously, so the goroutine is never running, so there are either no locks or they've been released by the goroutine. However, we're about to change when stack shrinking can happen, which is going to break the current rules. Rather than find a new way to derive whether to acquire these locks or not, this CL simply adds a flag to the g struct that indicates that stack copying should acquire channel locks. This flag is set while the goroutine is blocked on a channel op. For #10958, #24543. Change-Id: Ia2ac8831b1bfda98d39bb30285e144c4f7eaf9ab Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/172982 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently, gcscanvalid is used to resolve a race between attempts to scan a stack. Now that there's a clear owner of the stack scan operation, there's no longer any danger of racing or attempting to scan a stack more than once, so this CL eliminates gcscanvalid. I double-checked my reasoning by first adding a throw if gcscanvalid was set in scanstack and verifying that all.bash still passed. For #10958, #24543. Fixes #24363. Change-Id: I76794a5fcda325ed7cfc2b545e2a839b8b3bc713 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201139 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
Austin Clements authored
This removes scang and preemptscan, since the stack scanning code now uses suspendG. For #10958, #24543. Change-Id: Ic868bf5d6dcce40662a82cb27bb996cb74d0720e Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201138 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently, the process of suspending a goroutine is tied to stack scanning. In preparation for non-cooperative preemption, this CL abstracts this into general purpose suspendG/resumeG functions. suspendG and resumeG closely follow the existing scang and restartg functions with one exception: the addition of a _Gpreempted status. Currently, preemption tasks (stack scanning) are carried out by the target goroutine if it's in _Grunning. In this new approach, the task is always carried out by the goroutine that called suspendG. Thus, we need a reliable way to drive the target goroutine out of _Grunning until the requesting goroutine is ready to resume it. The new _Gpreempted state provides the handshake: when a runnable goroutine responds to a preemption request, it now parks itself and enters _Gpreempted. The requesting goroutine races to put it in _Gwaiting, which gives it ownership, but also the responsibility to start it again. This CL adds several TODOs about improving the synchronization on the G status. The existing code already has these problems; we're just taking note of them. The next CL will remove the now-dead scang and preemptscan. For #10958, #24543. Change-Id: I16dbf87bea9d50399cc86719c156f48e67198f16 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201137 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
pokutuna authored
Fixes #35161 Updates #34439 Change-Id: I978534cbb8b9fb32c115dba0066cf099c61d8ee9 GitHub-Last-Rev: d60581635e8cefb7cfc4b571057542395034c575 GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#35162 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/203478Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com> Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Bryan C. Mills authored
mod_get_svn passes, and I also tested this manually on a real-world svn-hosted package: example.com$ go mod init example.com go: creating new go.mod: module example.com example.com$ GOPROXY=direct GONOSUMDB=llvm.org go get -d llvm.org/llvm/bindings/go/llvm go: finding llvm.org/llvm latest go: finding llvm.org/llvm/bindings/go/llvm latest go: downloading llvm.org/llvm v0.0.0-20191022153947-000000375505 go: extracting llvm.org/llvm v0.0.0-20191022153947-000000375505 example.com$ go list llvm.org/llvm/bindings/... llvm.org/llvm/bindings/go llvm.org/llvm/bindings/go/llvm Fixes #26092 Change-Id: Iefe2151b82a0225c73bb6f8dd7cd8a352897d4c0 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/203497 Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jay Conrod <jayconrod@google.com>
-
Tobias Klauser authored
CL 198544 broke the linux/arm64 build because it declares emptyfunc for GOARCH=arm64, but only freebsd/arm64 defines it. Make it a static assembly function specific for freebsd/arm64 and remove the stub. Fixes #35160 Change-Id: I5fd94249b60c6fd259c251407b6eccc8fa512934 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/203418Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
-
Bryan C. Mills authored
bradfitz is actively thinking about a proper fix. In the meantime, skip the test to suss out any other failures in the builder. Updates #35122 Change-Id: I9bf0640222e3d385c1a3e2be5ab52b80d3e8c21a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/203500 Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Bryan C. Mills authored
Previously, TestAtomicStop used a hard-coded 2-second timeout. That empirically is not long enough on certain builders. Rather than adjusting it to a different arbitrary value, use a slice of the overall timeout for the test binary. If everything is working, we won't block nearly that long anyway. Updates #35085 Change-Id: I7b789388e3152413395088088fc497419976cf5c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/203499 Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Tobias Klauser authored
Updates #24715 Change-Id: I110a10a5d5ed4a471f67f35cbcdcbea296c5dcaf Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/198542 Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
Tobias Klauser authored
Based on work by Mikaël Urankar (@MikaelUrankar), Shigeru YAMAMOTO (@bsd-hacker) and @myfreeweb. Updates #24715 Change-Id: If3189a693ca0aa627029e22b0f91534bcf322bc0 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/198544 Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
We already claim on the documentation for _Grunning that this is case, but execute transitions to _Grunning before assigning g.m. Fix this and make the documentation even more explicit. For #10958, #24543, but also a good cleanup. Change-Id: I1eb0108e7762f55cfb0282aca624af1c0a15fe56 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201440 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently, shrinkstack will not shrink a stack on Windows if gp.m.libcallsp != 0. In general, we can't shrink stacks in syscalls because the syscall may hold pointers into the stack, and in principle this is supposed to be preventing that for libcall-based syscalls (which are direct syscalls from the runtime). But this test is actually broken and has been for a long time. That turns out to be okay because it also appears it's not necessary. This test is racy. g.m points to whatever M the G was last running on, even if the G is in a blocked state, and that M could be doing anything, including making libcalls. Hence, observing that libcallsp == 0 at one moment in shrinkstack is no guarantee that it won't become non-zero while we're shrinking the stack, and vice-versa. It's also weird that this check is only performed on Windows, given that we now use libcalls on macOS, Solaris, and AIX. This check was added when stack shrinking was first implemented in CL 69580044. The history of that CL (though not the final version) suggests this was necessary for libcalls that happened on Go user stacks, which we never do now because of the limited stack space. It could also be defending against user stack pointers passed to libcall system calls from blocked Gs. But the runtime isn't allowed to keep pointers into the user stack for blocked Gs on any OS, so it's not clear this would be of any value. Hence, this checks seems to be simply unnecessary. Rather than simply remove it, this CL makes it defensive. We can't do anything about blocked Gs, since it doesn't even make sense to look at their M, but if a G tries to shrink its own stack while in a libcall, that indicates a bug in the libcall code. This CL makes shrinkstack panic in this case. For #10958, #24543, since those are going to rearrange how we decide that it's safe to shrink a stack. Change-Id: Ia865e1f6340cff26637f8d513970f9ebb4735c6d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/173724 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
Austin Clements authored
The x86 assembler supports an "ADJSP" pseudo-op that compiles to an ADD/SUB from SP. Unfortunately, while this seems perfect for an instruction that would allow obj to continue to track the SP/FP delta, obj currently doesn't do that. As a result, FP-relative references won't work and, perhaps worse, the pcsp table will have the wrong frame size. We don't currently use this instruction in any assembly or generate it in the compiler, but this is a perfect instruction for solving a problem in #24543. This CL makes ADJSP useful by incorporating it into the SP delta logic. One subtlety is that we do generate ADJSP in obj itself to open a function's stack frame. Currently, when preprocess enters the loop to compute the SP delta, it may or may not start at this ADJSP instruction depending on various factors. We clean this up by instead always starting the SP delta at 0 and always starting this loop at the entry to the function. Why not just recognize ADD/SUB of SP? The danger is that could change the meaning of existing code. For example, walltime1 in sys_linux_amd64.s saves SP, SUBs from it, and aligns it. Later, it restores the saved copy and then does a few FP-relative references. Currently obj doesn't know any of this is happening, but that's fine once it gets to the FP-relative references. If we taught obj to recognize the SUB, it would start to miscompile this code. An alternative would be to recognize unknown instructions that write to SP and refuse subsequent FP-relative references, but that's kind of annoying. This passes toolstash -cmp for std on both amd64 and 386. Change-Id: Ic6c6a7cbf980bca904576676c07b44c0aaa9c82d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/200877 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
-
ZYunH authored
Error string should not be capitalized. Change-Id: I8e1d148c6b999450bcd702f420c2a240f82aadc7 GitHub-Last-Rev: 6ca1b3edb4a61723fa6472a0f54cc6329898edbc GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#35147 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/203339Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Meng Zhuo authored
Change-Id: I625f0bc533a7d14010c0344f36e8f157a19c13f2 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/203437 Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com> Reviewed-by: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
-
Meng Zhuo authored
Change-Id: I60a1ca606fe7492c05697c4d58afc7f19fcc63fe Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/203340Reviewed-by: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com> Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Jason A. Donenfeld authored
According to MSDN, "If the data has the REG_SZ, REG_MULTI_SZ or REG_EXPAND_SZ type, this size includes any terminating null character or characters unless the data was stored without them. [...] If the data has the REG_SZ, REG_MULTI_SZ or REG_EXPAND_SZ type, the string may not have been stored with the proper terminating null characters. Therefore, even if the function returns ERROR_SUCCESS, the application should ensure that the string is properly terminated before using it; otherwise, it may overwrite a buffer." It's therefore dangerous to pass it off unbounded as we do, and in fact this led to crashes on real systems. Change-Id: I6d786211814656f036b87fd78631466634cd764a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/202937 Run-TryBot: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
-
Rob Pike authored
There were a couple of bugs, including not requiring a percent and returning the wrong error for a bad format containing %%. Both are addressed by fixing the first. Fixes #34180. Change-Id: If96c0c0258bcb95eec49871437d719cb9d399d9b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/202879 Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
-
Rémy Oudompheng authored
This notably allows to reuse temporaries across the karatsubaSqr recursion. benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta BenchmarkNatMul/10-4 227 228 +0.44% BenchmarkNatMul/100-4 8339 8589 +3.00% BenchmarkNatMul/1000-4 313796 312272 -0.49% BenchmarkNatMul/10000-4 11924720 11873589 -0.43% BenchmarkNatMul/100000-4 503813354 503839058 +0.01% BenchmarkNatSqr/20-4 549 513 -6.56% BenchmarkNatSqr/30-4 945 874 -7.51% BenchmarkNatSqr/50-4 1993 1832 -8.08% BenchmarkNatSqr/80-4 4096 3874 -5.42% BenchmarkNatSqr/100-4 6192 5712 -7.75% BenchmarkNatSqr/200-4 20388 19543 -4.14% BenchmarkNatSqr/300-4 38735 36715 -5.21% BenchmarkNatSqr/500-4 99562 93542 -6.05% BenchmarkNatSqr/800-4 195554 184907 -5.44% BenchmarkNatSqr/1000-4 286302 275053 -3.93% BenchmarkNatSqr/10000-4 9817057 9441641 -3.82% BenchmarkNatSqr/100000-4 390713416 379696789 -2.82% benchmark old allocs new allocs delta BenchmarkNatMul/10-4 1 1 +0.00% BenchmarkNatMul/100-4 1 1 +0.00% BenchmarkNatMul/1000-4 2 1 -50.00% BenchmarkNatMul/10000-4 2 1 -50.00% BenchmarkNatMul/100000-4 9 11 +22.22% BenchmarkNatSqr/20-4 2 1 -50.00% BenchmarkNatSqr/30-4 2 1 -50.00% BenchmarkNatSqr/50-4 2 1 -50.00% BenchmarkNatSqr/80-4 2 1 -50.00% BenchmarkNatSqr/100-4 2 1 -50.00% BenchmarkNatSqr/200-4 2 1 -50.00% BenchmarkNatSqr/300-4 4 1 -75.00% BenchmarkNatSqr/500-4 4 1 -75.00% BenchmarkNatSqr/800-4 10 1 -90.00% BenchmarkNatSqr/1000-4 10 1 -90.00% BenchmarkNatSqr/10000-4 731 1 -99.86% BenchmarkNatSqr/100000-4 19687 6 -99.97% benchmark old bytes new bytes delta BenchmarkNatMul/10-4 192 192 +0.00% BenchmarkNatMul/100-4 4864 4864 +0.00% BenchmarkNatMul/1000-4 57344 49224 -14.16% BenchmarkNatMul/10000-4 565248 498772 -11.76% BenchmarkNatMul/100000-4 5749504 7263720 +26.34% BenchmarkNatSqr/20-4 672 352 -47.62% BenchmarkNatSqr/30-4 992 512 -48.39% BenchmarkNatSqr/50-4 1792 896 -50.00% BenchmarkNatSqr/80-4 2688 1408 -47.62% BenchmarkNatSqr/100-4 3584 1792 -50.00% BenchmarkNatSqr/200-4 6656 3456 -48.08% BenchmarkNatSqr/300-4 24448 16387 -32.97% BenchmarkNatSqr/500-4 36864 24591 -33.29% BenchmarkNatSqr/800-4 69760 40981 -41.25% BenchmarkNatSqr/1000-4 86016 49180 -42.82% BenchmarkNatSqr/10000-4 2524800 487368 -80.70% BenchmarkNatSqr/100000-4 68599808 5876581 -91.43% Change-Id: I8e6e409ae1cb48be9d5aa9b5f428d6cbe487673a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/172017 Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
-
- 24 Oct, 2019 8 commits
-
-
Bryan C. Mills authored
Previously, codehost.Repo.ReadZip returned an 'actualSubdir' value that was the empty string in all current implementations. Updates #26092 Change-Id: I6708dd0f13ba88bcf1a1fb405e9d818fd6f9197e Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/203277 Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Jay Conrod <jayconrod@google.com>
-
Jay Conrod authored
This change adds the -modfile flag to module aware build commands and to 'go mod' subcommands. -modfile may be set to a path to an alternate go.mod file to be read and written. A real go.mod file must still exist and is used to set the module root directory. However, it is not opened. When -modfile is set, the effective location of the go.sum file is also changed to the -modfile with the ".mod" suffix trimmed (if present) and ".sum" added. Updates #34506 Change-Id: I2d1e044e18af55505a4f24bbff09b73bb9c908b4 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/202564 Run-TryBot: Jay Conrod <jayconrod@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
-
Jay Conrod authored
base.Cwd should be used instead. Change-Id: I3dbdecf745b0823160984cc942c883dc04c91d7b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/203037 Run-TryBot: Jay Conrod <jayconrod@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
-
Bryan C. Mills authored
Change-Id: I241a3bbaf9c4b779b74146232d2f144bb46a0dc7 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/203178 Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Jay Conrod <jayconrod@google.com>
-
Jay Conrod authored
Sections will be filled in with individual CLs before Go 1.14. NOTE: This document is currently in Markdown for ease of writing / reviewing. Before Go 1.14, we will either ensure that x/website can render Markdown (flavor TBD) or check in a rendered HTML file that can be displayed directly. Updates #33637 Change-Id: Icd43fa2bdb7d256b28a56b93214b70343f43492e Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/202081Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
-
Bryan C. Mills authored
I had prohibited 'go list -m' with -mod=vendor because the module graph is incomplete, but I've realized that many queries do not actually require the full graph — and may, in fact, be driven using modules previously reported by 'go list' for specific, vendored packages. Queries for those modules should succeed. Updates #33848 Change-Id: I1000b4cf586a830bb78faf620ebf62d73a3cb300 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/203138 Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Jay Conrod <jayconrod@google.com>
-
Bryan C. Mills authored
Updates #33848 Change-Id: I10b4c79faef8bc3dee2ceba14d496fa049e84fb2 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/202977 Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Jay Conrod <jayconrod@google.com>
-
Cuong Manh Le authored
Correct comment about allocating big enough slice to copy result of Getdirentries. While at it, also convert from Dirent directly to slice of byte. Updates #35092 Change-Id: I892de7953120622882e1561728e1e56b009a2351 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/202880 Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-