Fixes #22473.

Change-Id: Ie886dfc8b5510970d6d63ca6472c73325f6f2276
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74971
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>

By position, to ensure deterministic output.

Fixes #22525.

Change-Id: I28777d504a622416678b52afd6fc4c3ef32c12af
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/75090
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>

An initial draft of the Newton code for Float.Sqrt was structured like
this:

  for condition
    // do Newton iteration..
    prec *= 2

since prec, at the end of the loop, was double the precision used in
the last Newton iteration, the termination condition was set to
2*limit. The code was later rewritten in the form

  for condition
    prec *= 2
    // do Newton iteration..

but condition was not updated, and it's still 2*limit, which is about
double what we actually need, and is triggering the execution of an
additional, and unnecessary, Newton iteration.

This change adjusts the Newton termination condition to the (correct)
value of z.prec, plus 32 guard bits as a safety margin.

name                 old time/op    new time/op    delta
FloatSqrt/64-4          798ns ± 3%     802ns ± 3%     ~     (p=0.458 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/128-4        1.65µs ± 1%    1.65µs ± 1%     ~     (p=0.290 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/256-4        3.10µs ± 1%    2.10µs ± 0%  -32.32%  (p=0.000 n=8+7)
FloatSqrt/1000-4       8.83µs ± 1%    4.91µs ± 2%  -44.39%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/10000-4       107µs ± 1%      40µs ± 1%  -62.68%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/100000-4     2.91ms ± 1%    0.96ms ± 1%  -67.13%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/1000000-4     240ms ± 1%      80ms ± 1%  -66.66%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)

name                 old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
FloatSqrt/64-4           416B ± 0%      416B ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
FloatSqrt/128-4          720B ± 0%      720B ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
FloatSqrt/256-4        1.34kB ± 0%    0.82kB ± 0%  -39.29%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/1000-4       5.09kB ± 0%    2.50kB ± 0%  -50.94%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/10000-4      45.9kB ± 0%    23.5kB ± 0%  -48.81%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/100000-4      533kB ± 0%     251kB ± 0%  -52.90%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/1000000-4    9.21MB ± 0%    4.61MB ± 0%  -49.98%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)

name                 old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
FloatSqrt/64-4           9.00 ± 0%      9.00 ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
FloatSqrt/128-4          13.0 ± 0%      13.0 ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
FloatSqrt/256-4          15.0 ± 0%      12.0 ± 0%  -20.00%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/1000-4         24.0 ± 0%      19.0 ± 0%  -20.83%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/10000-4        40.0 ± 0%      35.0 ± 0%  -12.50%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/100000-4       66.0 ± 0%      55.0 ± 0%  -16.67%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/1000000-4       143 ± 0%       122 ± 0%  -14.69%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)

Change-Id: I4868adb7f8960f2ca20e7792734c2e6211669fc0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/75010Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>

Change-Id: I4542f6c095a35a4dec03c67c45a75a155197eb56
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74650Reviewed-by: Tom Bergan <tombergan@google.com>

Recurse into structs/arrays of one element when
assigning names.

Test incorporated into existing end-to-end debugger test,
hand-verified that it fails without this CL.

Fixes #19868

Revives CL 40010
Old-Change-Id: I0266e58af975fb64cfa17922be383b70f0a7ea96

Change-Id: I122ac2375931477769ec8d763607c1ec42d78a7f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/71731
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>

Dsymutil, an utility used on macOS when externally linking executables,
does not support base address selector entries in debug_ranges.

To work around this deficiency this commit removes base address
selectors from debug_ranges and emits instead a list composed only of
compile unit relative addresses.

A new type of relocation is introduced, R_ADDRCUOFF, similar to
R_ADDROFF, that relocates an address to its offset from the low_pc of
the symbol's compile unit.

Fixes #21945

Change-Id: Ie991f9bc1afda2b49ac5d734eb41c37d3a37e554
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/72371
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>

After this CL, "go vet" can be guaranteed to have complete type information
about the packages being checked, even if cgo or swig is in use,
which will in turn make it reasonable for vet checks to insist on type
information. It also fixes vet's understanding of unusual import paths
like relative paths and vendored packages.

For now "go tool vet" will continue to cope without type information,
but the eventual plan is for "go tool vet" to query the go command for
what it needs, and also to be able to query alternate build systems
like bazel. But that's future work.

Fixes #4889.
Fixes #12556 (if not already fixed).
Fixes #15182.
Fixes #16086.
Fixes #17571.

Change-Id: I932626ee7da649b302cd269b82eb6fe5d7b9f0f2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74750Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>

This CL adds support for accepting package config from
the go command. Paired with CL 74356 this lets us make
sure vet has complete information about package sources.
This fixes many issues (see CL 74356 for the list), including
mishandling of cgo and vendoring.

Change-Id: Ia4a1dce6f9b1b0a8ef5fdf9005a20a8b294969f1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74355
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>

Also, support spaces in go binaries locations, and document
GOROOT_BOOTSTRAP at the top.

Change-Id: I643d22df57aad9a2200cc256edd20e8c811bc70d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74951
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <hi@filippo.io>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>

The check of uintptr(newcap) > maxSliceCap(et.size) in addition
to capmem > _MaxMem is needed to prevent a reproducible overflow
on 32bit architectures.

On 64bit platforms this problem is less likely to occur as allocation
of a sufficiently large array or slice to be append is likely to
already exhaust available memory before the call to append can be made.

Example program that without the fix in this CL does segfault on 386:

type T [1<<27 + 1]int64

var d T
var s []T

func main() {
        s = append(s, d, d, d, d)
        print(len(s), "\n")
}

Fixes #21586

Change-Id: Ib4185435826ef43df71ba0f789e19f5bf9a347e6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/55133
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>

testing.Skip{,f} will exit the test via runtime.Goexit. Thus, the
successive return is never reached and can be removed.

Change-Id: I1e399f3d5db753ece1ffba648850427e1b4be300
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74990
Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>

The Sqrt Newton method computes g(t) = f(t)/f'(t) and then iterates

  t2 = t1 - g(t1)

We can save one operation by including the final subtraction in g(t)
and evaluating the resulting expression symbolically.

For example, for the direct method,

  g(t) = ½(t² - x)/t

and we use 2 multiplications, 1 division and 1 subtraction in g(),
plus 1 final subtraction; but if we compute

  t - g(t) = t - ½(t² - x)/t = ½(t² + x)/t

we only use 2 multiplications, 1 division and 1 addition.

A similar simplification can be done for the inverse method.

name                 old time/op    new time/op    delta
FloatSqrt/64-4          889ns ± 4%     790ns ± 1%  -11.19%  (p=0.000 n=8+7)
FloatSqrt/128-4        1.82µs ± 0%    1.64µs ± 1%  -10.07%  (p=0.001 n=6+8)
FloatSqrt/256-4        3.56µs ± 4%    3.10µs ± 3%  -12.96%  (p=0.000 n=7+8)
FloatSqrt/1000-4       9.06µs ± 3%    8.86µs ± 1%   -2.20%  (p=0.001 n=7+7)
FloatSqrt/10000-4       109µs ± 1%     107µs ± 1%   -1.56%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/100000-4     2.91ms ± 0%    2.89ms ± 2%   -0.68%  (p=0.026 n=7+7)
FloatSqrt/1000000-4     237ms ± 1%     239ms ± 1%   +0.72%  (p=0.021 n=8+8)

name                 old alloc/op   new alloc/op   delta
FloatSqrt/64-4           448B ± 0%      416B ± 0%   -7.14%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/128-4          752B ± 0%      720B ± 0%   -4.26%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/256-4        2.05kB ± 0%    1.34kB ± 0%  -34.38%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/1000-4       6.91kB ± 0%    5.09kB ± 0%  -26.39%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/10000-4      60.5kB ± 0%    45.9kB ± 0%  -24.17%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/100000-4      617kB ± 0%     533kB ± 0%  -13.57%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/1000000-4    10.3MB ± 0%     9.2MB ± 0%  -10.85%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)

name                 old allocs/op  new allocs/op  delta
FloatSqrt/64-4           9.00 ± 0%      9.00 ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
FloatSqrt/128-4          13.0 ± 0%      13.0 ± 0%     ~     (all equal)
FloatSqrt/256-4          20.0 ± 0%      15.0 ± 0%  -25.00%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/1000-4         31.0 ± 0%      24.0 ± 0%  -22.58%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/10000-4        50.0 ± 0%      40.0 ± 0%  -20.00%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/100000-4       76.0 ± 0%      66.0 ± 0%  -13.16%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)
FloatSqrt/1000000-4       146 ± 0%       143 ± 0%   -2.05%  (p=0.000 n=8+8)

Change-Id: I271c00de1ca9740e585bf2af7bcd87b18c1fa68e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/73879
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>

commentText is only called if g != nil in ParseGo, so the check inside
commentText is redundant and can be deleted.

Change-Id: I130c18b738527c96bc59950b354a50b9e23f92e9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74871
Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>

Makes tests run ~1ms faster.

Change-Id: Ida509952469540280996d2bd9266724829e53c91
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47359Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <hi@filippo.io>
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <hi@filippo.io>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>

Updates #9346
Updates #22135

Change-Id: I7039c9f7d49600e877e35b7255c341fea35890e2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74890Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>

This is basically a mini-bootstrap, to reach a fixed point.

Change-Id: I88abad3d3ac961c3d11a48cb64d625d458684ef7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74792
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>

Otherwise the new numbered directories like b028/ appear in the objects,
and they can change from run to run.

Fixes #22514.

Change-Id: I8d0cf65f3622e48b2547d5757febe0ee1301e2ed
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74791
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>

This makes 'go install cmd/compile' in one directory produce
a different binary from running it in another directory,
which is problematic for reproducible builds.

Change-Id: If26685d2e45d2695413b472142b49694716575fa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74790
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>

When a SyntaxError occurs, report the current offset within the stream.
The code already accounted for the offset within the current buffer
being scanned. By including how much data was already scanned, the
current offset can be computed.

Fixes #22478

Change-Id: I91ecd4cad0b85a5c1556bc597f3ee914e769af01
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74251Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>

Closes #21279

Change-Id: I84d6b168a684fa9f3c046028d0c9f00292d7c110
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/61132Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>

Add a DisallowUnknownFields flag to Decoder.

DisallowUnknownFields causes the Decoder to return an error when
the the decoding destination is a struct and the input contains
object keys which do not match any non-ignored, public field the
destination, including keys whose value is set to null.

Note: this fix has already been worked on in 27231, which seems
to be abandoned. This version is a slightly simpler implementation
and is up to date with the master branch.

Fixes #15314

Change-Id: I987a5857c52018df334f4d1a2360649c44a7175d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74830Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>

Since Go1.8, different types of GC mark workers were annotated and the
annotation strings were recorded during StartTrace. This change fixes
two issues around the use of traceString from StartTrace here.

1) "failed to parse trace: no consistent ordering of events possible"

This issue is a result of a missing 'batch' event entry. For efficient
tracing, tracer maintains system allocated buffers and once a buffer
is full, it is Flushed out for writing. Moreover, tracing assumes all
the records in the same buffer (batch) are already ordered and implements
more optimization in encoding and defers the completing order
reconstruction till the trace parsing time. Thus, when a Flush happens
and a new buffer is used, the new buffer should contain an event to
indicate the start of a new batch. Before this CL, the batch entry was
written only by traceEvent only when the buffer position is 0 and
wasn't written when flush occurs during traceString.

This CL fixes it by moving the batch entry write to the traceFlush.

2) crash during tracing due to invalid memory access, or during parsing
due to duplicate string entries

This issue is a result of memory allocation during traceString calls.
Execution tracer traces some memory allocation activities. Before this
CL, traceString took the buffer address (*traceBuf) and mutated the buffer.
If memory tracing occurs in the meantime from the same P, the allocation
tracing (traceEvent) will take the same buffer address through the pointer
to the buffer address (**traceBuf), and mutate the buffer.

As a result, one of the followings can happen:
 - the allocation record is overwritten by the following trace string
   record (data loss)
 - if buffer flush occurs during the allocation tracing, traceString
   will attempt to write the string record to the old buffer and
   eventually causes invalid memory access crash.
 - or flush on the same buffer can occur twice (once from the memory
   allocation, and once from the string record write), and in this case
   the trace can contain the same data twice and the parse will complain
   about duplicate string record entries.

This CL fixes the second issue by making the traceString take
**traceBuf (*traceBufPtr).

Change-Id: I24f629758625b38e1916fbfc7d7be6ea210586af
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/50873
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Hyang-Ah Hana Kim <hyangah@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>

Currently, both the background mark worker and the goal GC CPU are
both fixed at 25%. The trigger controller's goal is to achieve the
goal CPU usage, and with the previous commit it can actually achieve
this. But this means there are *no* assists, which sounds ideal but
actually causes problems for the trigger controller. Since the
controller can't lower CPU usage below the background mark worker CPU,
it saturates at the CPU goal and no longer gets feedback, which
translates into higher variability in heap growth.

This commit fixes this by allowing assists 5% CPU beyond the 25% fixed
background mark. This avoids saturating the trigger controller, since
it can now get feedback from both sides of the CPU goal. This leads to
low variability in both CPU usage and heap growth, at the cost of
reintroducing a low rate of mark assists.

We also experimented with 20% background plus 5% assist, but 25%+5%
clearly performed better in benchmarks.

Updates #14951.
Updates #14812.
Updates #18534.

Combined with the previous CL, this significantly improves tail
mutator utilization in the x/bechmarks garbage benchmark. On a sample
trace, it increased the 99.9%ile mutator utilization at 10ms from 26%
to 59%, and at 5ms from 17% to 52%. It reduced the 99.9%ile zero
utilization window from 2ms to 700µs. It also helps the mean mutator
utilization: it increased the 10s mutator utilization from 83% to 94%.
The minimum mutator utilization is also somewhat improved, though
there is still some unknown artifact that causes a miniscule fraction
of mutator assists to take 5--10ms (in fact, there was exactly one
10ms mutator assist in my sample trace).

This has no significant effect on the throughput of the
github.com/dr2chase/bent benchmarks-50.

This has little effect on the go1 benchmarks (and the slight overall
improvement makes up for the slight overall slowdown from the previous
commit):

name                      old time/op    new time/op    delta
BinaryTree17-12              2.40s ± 0%     2.41s ± 1%  +0.26%  (p=0.010 n=18+19)
Fannkuch11-12                2.95s ± 0%     2.93s ± 0%  -0.62%  (p=0.000 n=18+15)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12          42.2ns ± 0%    42.3ns ± 1%  +0.37%  (p=0.001 n=15+14)
FmtFprintfString-12         67.9ns ± 2%    67.2ns ± 3%  -1.03%  (p=0.002 n=20+18)
FmtFprintfInt-12            75.6ns ± 3%    76.8ns ± 2%  +1.59%  (p=0.000 n=19+17)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12          123ns ± 1%     124ns ± 1%  +0.77%  (p=0.000 n=17+14)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12     148ns ± 1%     150ns ± 1%  +1.28%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
FmtFprintfFloat-12           212ns ± 0%     211ns ± 1%  -0.67%  (p=0.000 n=16+17)
FmtManyArgs-12               499ns ± 1%     500ns ± 0%  +0.23%  (p=0.004 n=19+16)
GobDecode-12                6.49ms ± 1%    6.51ms ± 1%  +0.32%  (p=0.008 n=19+19)
GobEncode-12                5.47ms ± 0%    5.43ms ± 1%  -0.68%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
Gzip-12                      220ms ± 1%     216ms ± 1%  -1.66%  (p=0.000 n=20+19)
Gunzip-12                   38.8ms ± 0%    38.5ms ± 0%  -0.80%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
HTTPClientServer-12         78.5µs ± 1%    78.1µs ± 1%  -0.53%  (p=0.008 n=20+19)
JSONEncode-12               12.2ms ± 0%    11.9ms ± 0%  -2.38%  (p=0.000 n=17+19)
JSONDecode-12               52.3ms ± 0%    53.3ms ± 0%  +1.84%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
Mandelbrot200-12            3.69ms ± 0%    3.69ms ± 0%  -0.19%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
GoParse-12                  3.17ms ± 1%    3.19ms ± 1%  +0.61%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12      73.7ns ± 0%    73.2ns ± 1%  -0.66%  (p=0.000 n=17+20)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12       238ns ± 0%     239ns ± 0%  +0.32%  (p=0.000 n=17+16)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12      69.1ns ± 1%    69.2ns ± 1%    ~     (p=0.669 n=19+13)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12       365ns ± 1%     367ns ± 1%  +0.49%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12      104ns ± 1%     105ns ± 1%  +1.33%  (p=0.000 n=16+20)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12     33.6µs ± 3%    34.1µs ± 4%  +1.67%  (p=0.001 n=20+20)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12       1.67µs ± 1%    1.62µs ± 1%  -2.78%  (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12       50.3µs ± 2%    48.7µs ± 1%  -3.09%  (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Revcomp-12                   384ms ± 0%     386ms ± 0%  +0.59%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Template-12                 61.1ms ± 1%    60.5ms ± 1%  -1.02%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
TimeParse-12                 307ns ± 0%     303ns ± 1%  -1.23%  (p=0.000 n=19+15)
TimeFormat-12                323ns ± 0%     323ns ± 0%  -0.12%  (p=0.011 n=15+20)
[Geo mean]                  47.1µs         47.0µs       -0.20%

https://perf.golang.org/search?q=upload:20171030.4

It slightly improve the performance the x/benchmarks:

name                         old time/op  new time/op  delta
Garbage/benchmem-MB=1024-12  2.29ms ± 3%  2.22ms ± 2%  -2.97%  (p=0.000 n=18+18)
Garbage/benchmem-MB=64-12    2.24ms ± 2%  2.21ms ± 2%  -1.64%  (p=0.000 n=18+18)
HTTP-12                      12.6µs ± 1%  12.6µs ± 1%    ~     (p=0.690 n=19+17)
JSON-12                      11.3ms ± 2%  11.3ms ± 1%    ~     (p=0.163 n=17+18)

and fixes some of the heap size bloat caused by the previous commit:

name                         old peak-RSS-bytes  new peak-RSS-bytes  delta
Garbage/benchmem-MB=1024-12          1.88G ± 2%          1.77G ± 2%  -5.52%  (p=0.000 n=20+18)
Garbage/benchmem-MB=64-12             248M ± 8%           226M ± 5%  -8.93%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
HTTP-12                              47.0M ±27%          47.2M ±12%    ~     (p=0.512 n=20+20)
JSON-12                               206M ±11%           206M ±10%    ~     (p=0.841 n=20+20)

https://perf.golang.org/search?q=upload:20171030.5

Combined with the change to add a soft goal in the previous commit,
the achieves a decent performance improvement on the garbage
benchmark:

name                         old time/op  new time/op  delta
Garbage/benchmem-MB=1024-12  2.40ms ± 4%  2.22ms ± 2%  -7.40%  (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Garbage/benchmem-MB=64-12    2.23ms ± 1%  2.21ms ± 2%  -1.06%  (p=0.000 n=19+18)
HTTP-12                      12.5µs ± 1%  12.6µs ± 1%    ~     (p=0.330 n=20+17)
JSON-12                      11.1ms ± 1%  11.3ms ± 1%  +1.87%  (p=0.000 n=16+18)

https://perf.golang.org/search?q=upload:20171030.6

Change-Id: If04ddb57e1e58ef2fb9eec54c290eb4ae4bea121
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/59971
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>

Currently, GC pacing is based on a single hard heap limit computed
based on GOGC. In order to achieve this hard limit, assist pacing
makes the conservative assumption that the entire heap is live.
However, in the steady state (with GOGC=100), only half of the heap is
live. As a result, the garbage collector works twice as hard as
necessary and finishes half way between the trigger and the goal.
Since this is a stable state for the trigger controller, this repeats
from cycle to cycle. Matters are even worse if GOGC is higher. For
example, if GOGC=200, only a third of the heap is live in steady
state, so the GC will work three times harder than necessary and
finish only a third of the way between the trigger and the goal.

Since this causes the garbage collector to consume ~50% of the
available CPU during marking instead of the intended 25%, about 25% of
the CPU goes to mutator assists. This high mutator assist cost causes
high mutator latency variability.

This commit improves the situation by separating the heap goal into
two goals: a soft goal and a hard goal. The soft goal is set based on
GOGC, just like the current goal is, and the hard goal is set at a 10%
larger heap than the soft goal. Prior to the soft goal, assist pacing
assumes the heap is in steady state (e.g., only half of it is live).
Between the soft goal and the hard goal, assist pacing switches to the
current conservative assumption that the entire heap is live.

In benchmarks, this nearly eliminates mutator assists. However, since
background marking is fixed at 25% CPU, this causes the trigger
controller to saturate, which leads to somewhat higher variability in
heap size. The next commit will address this.

The lower CPU usage of course leads to longer mark cycles, though
really it means the mark cycles are as long as they should have been
in the first place. This does, however, lead to two potential
down-sides compared to the current pacing policy: 1. the total
overhead of the write barrier is higher because it's enabled more of
the time and 2. the heap size may be larger because there's more
floating garbage. We addressed 1 by significantly improving the
performance of the write barrier in the preceding commits. 2 can be
demonstrated in intense GC benchmarks, but doesn't seem to be a
problem in any real applications.

Updates #14951.
Updates #14812 (fixes?).
Fixes #18534.

This has no significant effect on the throughput of the
github.com/dr2chase/bent benchmarks-50.

This has little overall throughput effect on the go1 benchmarks:

name                      old time/op    new time/op    delta
BinaryTree17-12              2.41s ± 0%     2.40s ± 0%  -0.22%  (p=0.007 n=20+18)
Fannkuch11-12                2.95s ± 0%     2.95s ± 0%  +0.07%  (p=0.003 n=17+18)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12          41.7ns ± 3%    42.2ns ± 0%  +1.17%  (p=0.002 n=20+15)
FmtFprintfString-12         66.5ns ± 0%    67.9ns ± 2%  +2.16%  (p=0.000 n=16+20)
FmtFprintfInt-12            77.6ns ± 2%    75.6ns ± 3%  -2.55%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12          124ns ± 1%     123ns ± 1%  -0.98%  (p=0.000 n=18+17)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12     151ns ± 1%     148ns ± 1%  -1.75%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
FmtFprintfFloat-12           210ns ± 1%     212ns ± 0%  +0.75%  (p=0.000 n=19+16)
FmtManyArgs-12               501ns ± 1%     499ns ± 1%  -0.30%  (p=0.041 n=17+19)
GobDecode-12                6.50ms ± 1%    6.49ms ± 1%    ~     (p=0.234 n=19+19)
GobEncode-12                5.43ms ± 0%    5.47ms ± 0%  +0.75%  (p=0.000 n=20+19)
Gzip-12                      216ms ± 1%     220ms ± 1%  +1.71%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
Gunzip-12                   38.6ms ± 0%    38.8ms ± 0%  +0.66%  (p=0.000 n=18+19)
HTTPClientServer-12         78.1µs ± 1%    78.5µs ± 1%  +0.49%  (p=0.035 n=20+20)
JSONEncode-12               12.1ms ± 0%    12.2ms ± 0%  +1.05%  (p=0.000 n=18+17)
JSONDecode-12               53.0ms ± 0%    52.3ms ± 0%  -1.27%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
Mandelbrot200-12            3.74ms ± 0%    3.69ms ± 0%  -1.17%  (p=0.000 n=18+19)
GoParse-12                  3.17ms ± 1%    3.17ms ± 1%    ~     (p=0.569 n=19+20)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12      73.2ns ± 1%    73.7ns ± 0%  +0.76%  (p=0.000 n=18+17)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12       239ns ± 0%     238ns ± 0%  -0.27%  (p=0.000 n=13+17)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12      69.0ns ± 2%    69.1ns ± 1%    ~     (p=0.404 n=19+19)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12       367ns ± 1%     365ns ± 1%  -0.60%  (p=0.000 n=19+19)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12      105ns ± 1%     104ns ± 1%  -1.24%  (p=0.000 n=19+16)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12     34.1µs ± 2%    33.6µs ± 3%  -1.60%  (p=0.000 n=20+20)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12       1.62µs ± 1%    1.67µs ± 1%  +2.75%  (p=0.000 n=18+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12       48.8µs ± 1%    50.3µs ± 2%  +3.07%  (p=0.000 n=20+19)
Revcomp-12                   386ms ± 0%     384ms ± 0%  -0.57%  (p=0.000 n=20+19)
Template-12                 59.9ms ± 1%    61.1ms ± 1%  +2.01%  (p=0.000 n=20+19)
TimeParse-12                 301ns ± 2%     307ns ± 0%  +2.11%  (p=0.000 n=20+19)
TimeFormat-12                323ns ± 0%     323ns ± 0%    ~     (all samples are equal)
[Geo mean]                  47.0µs         47.1µs       +0.23%

https://perf.golang.org/search?q=upload:20171030.1

Likewise, the throughput effect on the x/benchmarks is minimal (and
reasonably positive on the garbage benchmark with a large heap):

name                         old time/op  new time/op  delta
Garbage/benchmem-MB=1024-12  2.40ms ± 4%  2.29ms ± 3%  -4.57%  (p=0.000 n=19+18)
Garbage/benchmem-MB=64-12    2.23ms ± 1%  2.24ms ± 2%  +0.59%  (p=0.016 n=19+18)
HTTP-12                      12.5µs ± 1%  12.6µs ± 1%    ~     (p=0.326 n=20+19)
JSON-12                      11.1ms ± 1%  11.3ms ± 2%  +2.15%  (p=0.000 n=16+17)

It does increase the heap size of the garbage benchmarks, but seems to
have relatively little impact on more realistic programs. Also, we'll
gain some of this back with the next commit.

name                         old peak-RSS-bytes  new peak-RSS-bytes  delta
Garbage/benchmem-MB=1024-12          1.21G ± 1%          1.88G ± 2%  +55.59%  (p=0.000 n=19+20)
Garbage/benchmem-MB=64-12             168M ± 3%           248M ± 8%  +48.08%  (p=0.000 n=18+20)
HTTP-12                              45.6M ± 9%          47.0M ±27%     ~     (p=0.925 n=20+20)
JSON-12                               193M ±11%           206M ±11%   +7.06%  (p=0.001 n=20+20)

https://perf.golang.org/search?q=upload:20171030.2

Change-Id: Ic78904135f832b4d64056cbe734ab979f5ad9736
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/59970
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>

Previously some of the AuxInt are uint32, which may not fit into
int32. This CL convert them to int32. This does not change the
generated code, but make ssacheck happy.

Pass "toolstash -cmp" for std cmd on ARM.

Fixes #22499.

Change-Id: Ib072d3c14962388bfeb0766c861995d00b4fa7c4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74770
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>

All of these had a return or break in the else body, so flipping the
condition means we can unindent and simplify.

Change-Id: If93e97504480d18a0dac3f2c8ffe57ab8bcb929c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74190
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>

This significantly speed-ups Trunc.
Ceil/Floor are using the same instruction, so do them too.

name     old time/op  new time/op  delta
Floor-6  3.33ns ± 1%  3.22ns ± 0%   -3.39%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Ceil-6   3.33ns ± 1%  3.22ns ± 0%   -3.16%  (p=0.000 n=10+7)
Trunc-6  4.83ns ± 0%  3.22ns ± 0%  -33.36%  (p=0.000 n=6+8)

Change-Id: If848790e458eedfe38a6a0407bb4f589c68ac254
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/68630
Run-TryBot: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>

Previously, anytime we exported a function or method declaration
(which includes methods for every type transitively exported), we
included the inline function bodies, if any. However, in many cases,
it's impossible (or at least very unlikely) for the importing package
to call the method.

For example:

    package p
    type T int
    func (t T) M() { t.u() }
    func (t T) u() {}
    func (t T) v() {}

T.M and T.u are inlineable, and they're both reachable through calls
to T.M, which is exported. However, t.v is also inlineable, but cannot
be reached.

Exception: if p.T is embedded in another type q.U, p.T.v will be
promoted to q.U.v, and the generated wrapper function could have
inlined the call to p.T.v. However, in practice, this doesn't happen,
and a missed inlining opportunity doesn't affect correctness.

To implement this, this CL introduces an extra flood fill pass before
exporting to mark inline bodies that are actually reachable, so the
exporter can skip over methods like t.v.

This reduces Kubernetes build time (as measured by "time go build -a
k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/...") on an HP Z620 measurably:

    == before ==
    real    0m44.658s
    user    11m19.136s
    sys     0m53.844s

    == after ==
    real    0m41.702s
    user    10m29.732s
    sys     0m50.908s

It also significantly cuts down the cost of enabling mid-stack
inlining (-l=4):

    == before (-l=4) ==
    real    1m19.236s
    user    20m6.528s
    sys     1m17.328s

    == after (-l=4) ==
    real    0m59.100s
    user    13m12.808s
    sys     0m58.776s

Updates #19348.

Change-Id: Iade58233ca42af823a1630517a53848b5d3c7a7e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74110
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>

The test was skipped because it did not work on AMD64 with
frame pointer enabled, and accidentally skipped on other
architectures. Now frame pointer is the default on AMD64.
Update the test to work with frame pointer. Now the test
is skipped only when frame pointer is NOT enabled on AMD64.

Fixes #18317.

Change-Id: I724cb6874e562f16e67ce5f389a1d032a2003115
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/68610
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>

Since copy function can figure out how many bytes of data to copy when
two slices have different length, it is not necessary to check how many
bytes need to copy each time before copying the data.

Change-Id: I5151ddfe46af5575566fe9c9a2648e111575ec3d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/71090Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <hi@filippo.io>
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <hi@filippo.io>
Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>

On PPC64 (and a few other architectures), accessing global
requires multiple instructions and use of temp register.
The compiler emits a single MOV prog, and the assembler
expands it to multiple instructions. If globals are accessed
multiple times, each time it generates a reload of the temp
register. As this is done by the assembler, the compiler
cannot optimize it.

This CL makes the compiler not fold address of global into load
and store. If a global is accessed multiple times, or multiple
fields of a struct are accessed, the compiler can CSE the
address. Currently, this doesn't help the case where different
globals are accessed, even though they may be close to each
other in the address space (which we don't know at compile time).

It helps a little bit in go1 benchmark:

name                     old time/op    new time/op    delta
BinaryTree17-2              4.84s ± 1%     4.84s ± 1%    ~     (p=0.796 n=10+10)
Fannkuch11-2                4.10s ± 0%     4.08s ± 0%  -0.58%  (p=0.000 n=9+8)
FmtFprintfEmpty-2          97.9ns ± 1%    96.8ns ± 1%  -1.08%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
FmtFprintfString-2          147ns ± 0%     147ns ± 1%    ~     (p=0.129 n=9+10)
FmtFprintfInt-2             152ns ± 0%     152ns ± 0%    ~     (p=0.294 n=10+8)
FmtFprintfIntInt-2          218ns ± 1%     217ns ± 0%  -0.64%  (p=0.000 n=10+8)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-2     263ns ± 1%     256ns ± 0%  -2.77%  (p=0.000 n=10+8)
FmtFprintfFloat-2           375ns ± 1%     368ns ± 0%  -1.95%  (p=0.000 n=10+7)
FmtManyArgs-2               849ns ± 0%     850ns ± 0%    ~     (p=0.621 n=8+9)
GobDecode-2                12.3ms ± 1%    12.2ms ± 1%  -0.94%  (p=0.003 n=10+10)
GobEncode-2                10.3ms ± 1%    10.5ms ± 1%  +2.03%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Gzip-2                      414ms ± 1%     414ms ± 0%    ~     (p=0.842 n=9+10)
Gunzip-2                   66.3ms ± 0%    66.4ms ± 0%    ~     (p=0.077 n=9+9)
HTTPClientServer-2         66.3µs ± 5%    66.4µs ± 1%    ~     (p=0.661 n=10+9)
JSONEncode-2               23.9ms ± 1%    23.9ms ± 1%    ~     (p=0.905 n=10+9)
JSONDecode-2                119ms ± 1%     116ms ± 0%  -2.65%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Mandelbrot200-2            5.11ms ± 0%    4.92ms ± 0%  -3.71%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
GoParse-2                  5.81ms ± 1%    5.84ms ± 1%    ~     (p=0.052 n=10+10)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-2       315ns ± 0%     317ns ± 0%  +0.67%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-2       658ns ± 0%     638ns ± 0%  -3.01%  (p=0.000 n=9+9)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-2       315ns ± 1%     317ns ± 0%  +0.56%  (p=0.000 n=9+9)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-2       935ns ± 0%     926ns ± 0%  -0.96%  (p=0.000 n=9+9)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-2      394ns ± 0%     396ns ± 1%  +0.46%  (p=0.001 n=10+10)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-2     65.1µs ± 0%    64.5µs ± 0%  -0.90%  (p=0.000 n=9+9)
RegexpMatchHard_32-2       3.16µs ± 0%    3.17µs ± 0%  +0.35%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-2       89.4µs ± 0%    89.3µs ± 0%    ~     (p=0.136 n=9+9)
Revcomp-2                   703ms ± 2%     694ms ± 2%  -1.41%  (p=0.009 n=10+10)
Template-2                  107ms ± 1%     107ms ± 1%    ~     (p=0.053 n=9+10)
TimeParse-2                 526ns ± 0%     524ns ± 0%  -0.34%  (p=0.002 n=9+9)
TimeFormat-2                534ns ± 0%     504ns ± 1%  -5.51%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
[Geo mean]                 93.8µs         93.1µs       -0.70%

It also helps in the case mentioned in issue #17110, main.main
in package math's test. Now it generates 4 loads of R31 instead
of 10, for the same piece of code.

This causes a slight increase of binary size: cmd/go increases
0.66%.

If this is a good idea, we should do it on other architectures
where accessing global is expensive.

Updates #17110.

Change-Id: I2687af6eafc04f2a57c19781ec300c33567094b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/68250
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

The new RoundToEven function can be implemented as a single FIDBR
instruction on s390x.

name         old time/op  new time/op  delta
RoundToEven  5.32ns ± 1%  0.86ns ± 1%  -83.86%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)

Change-Id: Iaf597e57a0d1085961701e3c75ff4f6f6dcebb5f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74350
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>

Noted in CL 73212 review by crawshaw.
Neglected to update CL 73212 before submitting.

Also fix printing of target goos/goarch for cross-compile build.

Change-Id: If702f23071a4456810f1de6abb9115b38933c5c1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74631
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>

Every time I see an error that begins `missing argument for Fprintf("%s")`
my mental type-checker goes off, since obviously "%s" is not a valid first
argument to Fprintf. Writing Printf("%s") to report an error in Printf("hello %s")
is almost as confusing.

This CL rewords the errors reported by vet's printf check to be more
consistent with each other, avoid placing context like "in printf call"
in the middle of the message, and to avoid the imprecisions above by
not quoting the format string at all.

Before:

	bad.go:9: no formatting directive in Printf call
	bad.go:10: missing argument for Printf("%s"): format reads arg 1, have only 0 args
	bad.go:11: wrong number of args for format in Printf call: 1 needed but 2 args
	bad.go:12: bad syntax for printf argument index: [1]
	bad.go:13: index value [0] for Printf("%[0]s"); indexes start at 1
	bad.go:14: missing argument for Printf("%[2]s"): format reads arg 2, have only 1 args
	bad.go:15: bad syntax for printf argument index: [abc]
	bad.go:16: unrecognized printf verb 'z'
	bad.go:17: arg "hello" for * in printf format not of type int
	bad.go:18: arg fmt.Sprint in printf call is a function value, not a function call
	bad.go:19: arg fmt.Sprint in Print call is a function value, not a function call
	bad.go:20: arg "world" for printf verb %d of wrong type: string
	bad.go:21: missing argument for Printf("%q"): format reads arg 2, have only 1 args
	bad.go:22: first argument to Print is os.Stderr
	bad.go:23: Println call ends with newline
	bad.go:32: arg r in Sprint call causes recursive call to String method
	bad.go:34: arg r for printf causes recursive call to String method

After:

	bad.go:9: Printf call has arguments but no formatting directives
	bad.go:10: Printf format %s reads arg #1, but have only 0 args
	bad.go:11: Printf call needs 1 args but has 2 args
	bad.go:12: Printf format %[1 is missing closing ]
	bad.go:13: Printf format has invalid argument index [0]
	bad.go:14: Printf format has invalid argument index [2]
	bad.go:15: Printf format has invalid argument index [abc]
	bad.go:16: Printf format %.234z has unknown verb z
	bad.go:17: Printf format %.*s uses non-int "hello" as argument of *
	bad.go:18: Printf format %s arg fmt.Sprint is a func value, not called
	bad.go:19: Print arg fmt.Sprint is a func value, not called
	bad.go:20: Printf format %d has arg "world" of wrong type string
	bad.go:21: Printf format %q reads arg #2, but have only 1 args
	bad.go:22: Print does not take io.Writer but has first arg os.Stderr
	bad.go:23: Println args end with redundant newline
	bad.go:32: Sprint arg r causes recursive call to String method
	bad.go:34: Sprintf format %s with arg r causes recursive String method call

Change-Id: I5719f0fb9f2cd84df8ad4c7754ab9b79c691b060
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74352
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>

The support in this CL assumes that something at a higher level than
the toolchain-specific importers is taking care of converting imports
in source code into canonical import paths before invoking the
toolchain-specific importers. That kind of "what does an import mean"
as opposed to "find me the import data for this specific path"
should be provided by higher-level layers.

That's a different layering than the default behavior but matches the
current layering in the compiler and linker and works with the metadata
planned for generation by the go command for package management.
It should also eventually allow the importer code to stop concerning
itself with source directories and vendor import translation and maybe
deprecate ImporterFrom in favor of Importer once again. But that's all
in the future. For now, just make non-nil lookups work, and test that.

Fixes #13847.
Adds #22550.

Change-Id: I048c6a384492e634988a7317942667689ae680ff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74354
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>

For #9346 #22135 explicitly state under layout constants
that they are not valid time values for Parse. Also add
examples of parsing valid RFC3339 values and the layout
to the example for time.Parse.

Fix capitalisation of time.Parse and Time.Format.

For #20869 include RFC3339 in the list of layouts that do
not accept all the time formats allowed by RFCs (lowercase z).
This does not fully address #20869.

Fixes #9346
Fixes #22135

Change-Id: Ia4c13e5745de583db5ef7d5b1688d7768bc42c1b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74231
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>

Change-Id: Ifa0384722dd879af7f5edb7b7aaac5ede3cff46d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74690
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>

The compiler's instrumentation pass has some out-of-date comments
about the write barrier and some confusing comments about
typedslicecopy. Update these comments and add a comment to
typedslicecopy explaining why it's manually instrumented while none of
the other operations are.

Change-Id: I024e5361d53f1c3c122db0c85155368a30cabd6b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74430Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>

When run `go doc -u http.connectMethod`, the whole table is treated as
a single long line. This commit inserts `\t` at the begining of each line,
so the table can be displayed properly in `go doc`.

Change-Id: I6408efd31f84c113e81167d62e1791643000d629
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74651Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>

Hide in the source code instead of in the separate whitelist.
Removes the only printf false positive in the standard library.

Change-Id: I99285e67588c7c93bd56d59ee768a03be7c301e7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74590
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>