1. 12 Aug, 2014 2 commits
  2. 11 Aug, 2014 7 commits
  3. 01 Aug, 2014 1 commit
  4. 25 Jul, 2014 1 commit
  5. 19 Jun, 2014 1 commit
  6. 18 Jun, 2014 3 commits
  7. 17 Jun, 2014 2 commits
  8. 13 Jun, 2014 3 commits
  9. 12 Jun, 2014 5 commits
  10. 11 Jun, 2014 6 commits
  11. 07 Jun, 2014 4 commits
  12. 05 Jun, 2014 1 commit
  13. 04 Jun, 2014 2 commits
  14. 03 Jun, 2014 2 commits
    • Russ Cox's avatar
      [release-branch.go1.3] crypto/tls: fix typo referencing the required Config field · 764cb069
      Russ Cox authored
      ««« CL 107740043 / d86ec79a5f30
      crypto/tls: fix typo referencing the required Config field
      
      Thanks to Frithjof Schulze for noticing.
      
      LGTM=adg
      R=adg
      CC=agl, golang-codereviews, r
      https://golang.org/cl/107740043
      
      »»»
      
      LGTM=r
      R=golang-codereviews, r
      CC=bradfitz, golang-codereviews, iant
      https://golang.org/cl/103020043
      764cb069
    • Russ Cox's avatar
      [release-branch.go1.3] cmd/gc: fix escape analysis of func returning indirect of parameter · 9381fe2d
      Russ Cox authored
      ««« CL 102040046 / a078b2056ebc
      cmd/gc: fix escape analysis of func returning indirect of parameter
      
      I introduced this bug when I changed the escape
      analysis to run in phases based on call graph
      dependency order, in order to be more precise about
      inputs escaping back to outputs (functions returning
      their arguments).
      
      Given
      
              func f(z **int) *int { return *z }
      
      we were tagging the function as 'z does not escape
      and is not returned', which is all true, but not
      enough information.
      
      If used as:
      
              var x int
              p := &x
              q := &p
              leak(f(q))
      
      then the compiler might try to keep x, p, and q all
      on the stack, since (according to the recorded
      information) nothing interesting ends up being
      passed to leak.
      
      In fact since f returns *q = p, &x is passed to leak
      and x needs to be heap allocated.
      
      To trigger the bug, you need a chain that the
      compiler wants to keep on the stack (like x, p, q
      above), and you need a function that returns an
      indirect of its argument, and you need to pass the
      head of the chain to that function. This doesn't
      come up very often: this bug has been present since
      June 2012 (between Go 1 and Go 1.1) and we haven't
      seen it until now. It helps that most functions that
      return indirects are getters that are simple enough
      to be inlined, avoiding the bug.
      
      Earlier versions of Go also had the benefit that if
      &x really wasn't used beyond x's lifetime, nothing
      broke if you put &x in a heap-allocated structure
      accidentally. With the new stack copying, though,
      heap-allocated structures containing &x are not
      updated when the stack is copied and x moves,
      leading to crashes in Go 1.3 that were not crashes
      in Go 1.2 or Go 1.1.
      
      The fix is in two parts.
      
      First, in the analysis of a function, recognize when
      a value obtained via indirect of a parameter ends up
      being returned. Mark those parameters as having
      content escape back to the return results (but we
      don't bother to write down which result).
      
      Second, when using the analysis to analyze, say,
      f(q), mark parameters with content escaping as
      having any indirections escape to the heap. (We
      don't bother trying to match the content to the
      return value.)
      
      The fix could be less precise (simpler).
      In the first part we might mark all content-escaping
      parameters as plain escaping, and then the second
      part could be dropped. Or we might assume that when
      calling f(q) all the things pointed at by q escape
      always (for any f and q).
      
      The fix could also be more precise (more complex).
      We might record the specific mapping from parameter
      to result along with the number of indirects from the
      parameter to the thing being returned as the result,
      and then at the call sites we could set up exactly the
      right graph for the called function. That would make
      notleaks(f(q)) be able to keep x on the stack, because
      the reuslt of f(q) isn't passed to anything that leaks it.
      
      The less precise the fix, the more stack allocations
      become heap allocations.
      
      This fix is exactly as precise as it needs to be so that
      none of the current stack allocations in the standard
      library turn into heap allocations.
      
      Fixes #8120.
      
      LGTM=iant
      R=golang-codereviews, iant
      CC=golang-codereviews, khr, r
      https://golang.org/cl/102040046
      »»»
      
      LGTM=iant
      R=golang-codereviews, iant
      CC=golang-codereviews
      https://golang.org/cl/103870043
      9381fe2d