- 20 May, 2014 4 commits
-
-
Russ Cox authored
The USEFIELD instructions no longer make it to the linker, so we have to do something else to pin the references they were pinning. Emit a 0-length relocation of type R_USEFIELD. Fixes #7486. LGTM=iant R=golang-codereviews, iant CC=golang-codereviews, r https://golang.org/cl/95530043
-
Russ Cox authored
The move from 4kB to 8kB in Go 1.2 was to eliminate many stack split hot spots. The move back to 4kB was predicated on copying stacks eliminating the potential for hot spots. Unfortunately, the fact that stacks do not copy 100% of the time means that hot spots can still happen under the right conditions, and the slowdown is worse now than it was in Go 1.2. There is a real program in issue 8030 that sees about a 30x slowdown: it has a reflect call near the top of the stack which inhibits any stack copying on that segment. Go back to 8kB until stack copying can be used 100% of the time. Fixes #8030. LGTM=khr, dave, iant R=iant, khr, r, bradfitz, dave CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/92540043
-
Russ Cox authored
The float32 const conversion used to round to float64 and then use the hardware to round to float32. Even though there was a range check before this conversion, the double rounding introduced inaccuracy: the round to float64 might round the value further away from the float32 range, reaching a float64 value that could not actually be rounded to float32. The hardware appears to give us 0 in that case, but it is probably undefined. Double rounding also meant that the wrong value might be used for certain border cases. Do the rounding the float32 ourselves, just as we already did the rounding to float64. This makes the conversion precise and also makes the conversion match the range check. Finally, add some code to print very large (bigger than float64) floating point constants in decimal floating point notation instead of falling back to the precise but human-unreadable binary floating point notation. Fixes #8015. LGTM=iant R=golang-codereviews, iant CC=golang-codereviews, r https://golang.org/cl/100580044
-
Shenghou Ma authored
Update #7980 This CL make the linker abort for the example program. For Go 1.4, we need to find a general way to handle large memory model programs. LGTM=dave, josharian, iant R=iant, dave, josharian CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/91500046
-
- 19 May, 2014 10 commits
-
-
Rob Pike authored
Fixes #7445. LGTM=bradfitz R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/94640043
-
Russ Cox authored
The temporary-introducing pass was not recursing into the argumnt of a receive operation. Fixes #8011. LGTM=r R=golang-codereviews, r CC=golang-codereviews, iant, khr https://golang.org/cl/91540043
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
Fixes #7256 LGTM=r R=golang-codereviews, r CC=golang-codereviews, rsc https://golang.org/cl/97590043
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
This is the main point of confusion and the emphasis of a recent Gophercon talk. Fixes #5886. (mostly fixed in previous commits) LGTM=r R=r CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/100560043
-
Russ Cox authored
CL 22730043 fixed a bug in these functions: they could return 1.0 despite documentation saying otherwise. But the fix changed the values returned in the non-buggy case too, which might invalidate programs depending on a particular stream when using rand.Seed(0) or when passing their own Source to rand.New. The example test says: // These tests serve as an example but also make sure we don't change // the output of the random number generator when given a fixed seed. so I think there is some justification for thinking we have promised not to change the values. In any case, there's no point in changing the values gratuitously: we can easily fix this bug without changing the values, and so we should. That CL just changed the test values too, which defeats the stated purpose, but it was just a comment. Add an explicit regression test, which might be a clearer signal next time that we don't want to change the values. Fixes #6721. (again) Fixes #8013. LGTM=r R=iant, r CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/95460049
-
Robert Griesemer authored
Fixes #8023. LGTM=rsc R=r, iant, ken, rsc CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/98340043
-
Aram Hăvărneanu authored
Discussion here: https://golang.org/cl/100490044/#msg14 LGTM=r R=r CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/98350043
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes #8010. LGTM=bradfitz, khr R=khr, bradfitz, dvyukov CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/91450048
-
Dmitriy Vyukov authored
Currently freeOSMemory makes only marking phase of GC, but not sweeping phase. So recently memory is not released after freeOSMemory. Do both marking and sweeping during freeOSMemory. Fixes #8019. LGTM=khr R=golang-codereviews, khr CC=golang-codereviews, rsc https://golang.org/cl/97550043
-
Andrew Gerrand authored
LGTM=bradfitz R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/94610043
-
- 17 May, 2014 2 commits
-
-
Mikio Hara authored
LGTM=bradfitz R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/92440043
-
Dave Cheney authored
Rename Seek to seek in asm file, was overlooked in CL 99320043. LGTM=bradfitz, r R=r, rsc, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/99320044
-
- 16 May, 2014 11 commits
-
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
Accidental change from fixing Content-Length on 204s in http://golang.org/issue/6685 earlier. LGTM=rsc R=rsc CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/92400047
-
Rob Pike authored
LGTM=minux.ma R=golang-codereviews, minux.ma CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/93420046
-
Mikio Hara authored
LGTM=r R=golang-codereviews, aram, 0intro, gobot, r CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/100490044
-
Rob Pike authored
Found by go vet. LGTM=crawshaw R=golang-codereviews, crawshaw CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/100510044
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
Fixes #8007. LGTM=r R=gri, r CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/91510044
-
Rob Pike authored
TBR=rsc TBR=rsc R=rsc CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/100500047
-
Russ Cox authored
These functions claimed to return error (an interface) and be implemented entirely in assembly, but it's not possible to create an interface from assembly (at least not easily). In reality the functions were written to return an errno uintptr despite the Go prototype saying error. When the errno was 0, they coincidentally filled out a nil error by writing the 0 to the type word of the interface. If the errno was ever non-zero, the functions would create a non-nil error that would crash when trying to call err.Error(). Luckily these functions (Seek, Time, Gettimeofday) pretty much never fail, so it was all kind of working. Found by go vet. LGTM=bradfitz, r R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz, r CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/99320043
-
Russ Cox authored
LGTM=r R=r CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/98290048
-
David du Colombier authored
Update #7947. LGTM=iant R=rsc, iant CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/91500044
-
Mikio Hara authored
LGTM=iant R=golang-codereviews, iant CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/93430044
-
Anthony Martin authored
TestLargeDefs was issuing over one million small writes to create a 7MB file (large.go). This is quite slow on Plan 9 since our disk file systems aren't very fast and they're usually accessed over the network. Buffering the writes makes the test about six times faster. Even on Linux, it's about 1.5 times faster. Here are the results on a slow Plan 9 machine: Before: % ./pack.test -test.v -test.run TestLargeDefs === RUN TestLargeDefs --- PASS: TestLargeDefs (125.11 seconds) PASS After: % ./pack.test -test.v -test.run TestLargeDefs === RUN TestLargeDefs --- PASS: TestLargeDefs (20.835 seconds) PASS LGTM=iant R=golang-codereviews, iant CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/95040044
-
- 15 May, 2014 13 commits
-
-
Shenghou Ma authored
LGTM=bradfitz R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/95490043
-
Russ Cox authored
The introduction of temporaries in order.c was not quite right for two corner cases: 1) The rewrite that pushed new variables on the lhs of a receive into the body of the case was dropping the declaration of the variables. If the variables escape, the declaration is what allocates them. Caught by escape analysis sanity check. In fact the declarations should move into the body always, so that we only allocate if the corresponding case is selected. Do that. (This is an optimization that was already present in Go 1.2. The new order code just made it stop working.) Fixes #7997. 2) The optimization to turn a single-recv select into an ordinary receive assumed it could take the address of the destination; not so if the destination is _. Fixes #7998. LGTM=iant R=golang-codereviews, iant CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/100480043
-
Guillaume J. Charmes authored
Calling tar.Reader.Read() used to work fine, but without this patch it panics. Simply return EOF to indicate the tar.Reader.Next() needs to be called. LGTM=iant, bradfitz R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz, iant, mikioh.mikioh, dominik.honnef CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/94530043
-
Mikio Hara authored
This CL restores dropped constants not supported in OpenBSD 5.5 and tris to keep the promise of API compatibility. Update #7049 LGTM=jsing, bradfitz R=rsc, jsing, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/94950043
-
Mikio Hara authored
This CL restores dropped constants not supported in OpenBSD 5.5 and tris to keep the promise of API compatibility. Update #7049 LGTM=jsing, bradfitz, rsc R=rsc, jsing, robert.hencke, minux.ma, bradfitz, iant CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/96970043
-
Robert Griesemer authored
- use Init to establish heap invariant on a non-empty heap - use Fix to update heap after an element's properties have been changed (The old code used Init where it wasn't needed, and didn't use Fix because Fix was added after the example was written.) LGTM=bradfitz R=adonovan, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/94520043
-
Russ Cox authored
for GOOS in darwin freebsd linux nacl netbsd openbsd plan9 solaris windows do for GOARCH in 386 amd64 amd64p32 arm do go vet done done These are all real mistakes being corrected, but none of them should be able to cause problems today due to the NOSPLIT on the functions. However, vet has also identified a few important problems. I'm sending this CL to get rid of the trivial 'go vet' results before attacking the real ones. LGTM=r R=golang-codereviews, r, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/95460046
-
Russ Cox authored
None of these are real bugs. The variable name in the reference is not semantically meaningful, except that 'go vet' will double check the offset against the name for you. The stack sizes being corrected really are incorrect but they are also in NOSPLIT functions so they typically don't matter. Found by vet. GOOS=linux GOARCH=amd64 go vet sync/atomic GOOS=linux GOARCH=amd64p32 go vet sync/atomic GOOS=linux GOARCH=386 go vet sync/atomic GOOS=linux GOARCH=arm go vet sync/atomic GOOS=freebsd GOARCH=arm go vet sync/atomic GOOS=netbsd GOARCH=arm go vet sync/atomic LGTM=r R=r, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/100500043
-
Russ Cox authored
The vet check is in CL 10470044. LGTM=bradfitz, r R=r, bradfitz CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/91480044
-
Russ Cox authored
The GC program describing a data structure sometimes trusts the pointer base type and other times does not (if not, the garbage collector must fall back on per-allocation type information stored in the heap). Make the scanning of a pointer in an interface do the same. This fixes a crash in a particular use of reflect.SliceHeader. Fixes #8004. LGTM=khr R=golang-codereviews, khr CC=0xe2.0x9a.0x9b, golang-codereviews, iant, r https://golang.org/cl/100470045
-
Mikio Hara authored
LGTM=ruiu R=golang-codereviews, ruiu CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/91480043
-
Russ Cox authored
Globals, function arguments, and results are special cases in registerization. Globals must be flushed aggressively, because nearly any operation can cause a panic, and the recovery code must see the latest values. Globals also must be loaded aggressively, because nearly any store through a pointer might be updating a global: the compiler cannot see all the "address of" operations on globals, especially exported globals. To accomplish this, mark all globals as having their address taken, which effectively disables registerization. If a function contains a defer statement, the function results must be flushed aggressively, because nearly any operation can cause a panic, and the deferred code may call recover, causing the original function to return the current values of its function results. To accomplish this, mark all function results as having their address taken if the function contains any defer statements. This causes not just aggressive flushing but also aggressive loading. The aggressive loading is overkill but the best we can do in the current code. Function arguments must be considered live at all safe points in a function, because garbage collection always preserves them: they must be up-to-date in order to be preserved correctly. Accomplish this by marking them live at all call sites. An earlier attempt at this marked function arguments as having their address taken, which disabled registerization completely, making programs slower. This CL's solution allows registerization while preserving safety. The benchmark speedup is caused by being able to registerize again (the earlier CL lost the same amount). benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta BenchmarkEqualPort32 61.4 56.0 -8.79% benchmark old MB/s new MB/s speedup BenchmarkEqualPort32 521.56 570.97 1.09x Fixes #1304. (again) Fixes #7944. (again) Fixes #7984. Fixes #7995. LGTM=khr R=golang-codereviews, khr CC=golang-codereviews, iant, r https://golang.org/cl/97500044
-
Russ Cox authored
Do not compare nil and true. Fixes #7996. LGTM=r R=golang-codereviews, r CC=golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/91470043
-