- 29 Jul, 2015 4 commits
-
-
Rick Hudson authored
The scheduler, work buffer's dispose, and write barriers can conspire to hide the a pointer from the GC's concurent mark phase. If this pointer is the only path to a large amount of marking the STW mark termination phase may take a lot of time. Consider the following: 1) dispose places a work buffer on the partial queue 2) the GC is busy so it does not immediately remove and process the work buffer 3) the scheduler runs a mutator whose write barrier dequeues the work buffer from the partial queue so the GC won't see it This repeats until the GC reaches the mark termination phase where the GC finally discovers the pointer along with a lot of work to do. This CL fixes the problem by having the mutator dispose of the buffer to the full queue instead of the partial queue. Since the write buffer never asks for full buffers the conspiracy described above is not possible. Updates #11694. Change-Id: I2ce832f9657a7570f800e8ce4459cd9e304ef43b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12840Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-
Rob Pike authored
Change-Id: I45d92fed757fa1866d5b80e53ed1af6712fa6741 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12782Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Mikio Hara authored
Updates #10510. Change-Id: Ib4d39943969d18517b373292b83d87650d5df12a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12787 Run-TryBot: Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Rob Pike authored
These are the old assemblers written in C, and now they are not needed. Fixes #10510. Change-Id: Id9337ffc8eccfd93c84b2e23f427fb1a576b543d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12784Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
- 28 Jul, 2015 23 commits
-
-
Matthew Dempsky authored
At this stage, dist is only building go_bootstrap as cmd/compile and the rest of the Go toolchain has already been built. Change-Id: I6f99fa00ff1d3585e215f4ce84d49344c4fcb8a5 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12779Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes #11864. Change-Id: Ib9d5bd79f3b73ebd32f6585b354aaad556e0fc71 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12749Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
-
Dmitry Vyukov authored
Currently stackDebug=4 crashes as: panic: runtime error: index out of range fatal error: panic on system stack runtime stack: runtime.throw(0x607470, 0x15) src/runtime/panic.go:527 +0x96 runtime.gopanic(0x5ada00, 0xc82000a1d0) src/runtime/panic.go:354 +0xb9 runtime.panicindex() src/runtime/panic.go:12 +0x49 runtime.adjustpointers(0xc820065ac8, 0x7ffe58b56100, 0x7ffe58b56318, 0x0) src/runtime/stack1.go:428 +0x5fb runtime.adjustframe(0x7ffe58b56200, 0x7ffe58b56318, 0x1) src/runtime/stack1.go:542 +0x780 runtime.gentraceback(0x487760, 0xc820065ac0, 0x0, 0xc820001080, 0x0, 0x0, 0x7fffffff, 0x6341b8, 0x7ffe58b56318, 0x0, ...) src/runtime/traceback.go:336 +0xa7e runtime.copystack(0xc820001080, 0x1000) src/runtime/stack1.go:616 +0x3b1 runtime.newstack() src/runtime/stack1.go:801 +0xdde Change-Id: If2d60960231480a9dbe545d87385fe650d6db808 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12763Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes #11886. Change-Id: I9392fd2ef5951173ae275b3ab42db4f8bd2e1d7a Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12747Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
-
David du Colombier authored
Russ Cox fixed this issue for other systems in CL 12026, but the Plan 9 part was forgotten. Fixes #11656. Change-Id: I91c033687987ba43d13ad8f42e3fe4c7a78e6075 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12762Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
David Crawshaw authored
Change-Id: Iee0f3890d66b4117aa5d9f486e5775b1cf31996c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12745Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
The netbsd/386 builder reports a failure at http://build.golang.org/log/c21c45a4fc6f4845868aa3ebde0f5bb3f167f3a3 I'm assuming that this is similar to the unknown openbsd failure. Update #11910. Change-Id: I9cdfefa23dc7cda3849f14814b3ce531f1d39e93 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12777Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
This is a reprise of https://golang.org/cl/12623. In that a CL I made a suggestion which forgot that the +build constraints in the test directory are not the same as those supported by the go tool: in the test directory, if a single +build line fails, the test is skipped. (In my defense, the code I was commenting on was also wrong.) Change-Id: I8f29392a80b1983027f9a33043c803578409d678 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12776 Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes #11900. Change-Id: Idfc54e1fac833c8d646266128efe46214a82dfed Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12741Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
The function is already defined between syscall_solaris.go and syscall2_solaris.go. Change-Id: I034baf7c8531566bebfdbc5a4061352cbcc31449 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12773Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Mikio Hara authored
Change-Id: I82e3aadbd18fccb98a76d1c36876510f5e1c3089 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12750Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Jeff R. Allen authored
Reformat some help messages to stay within 80 characters. Fixes #11840. Change-Id: Iebafcb616f202ac44405e5897097492a79a51722 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12514Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
-
Mikio Hara authored
This change prevents DNS query results using domain search list overtaking results not using the list unconditionally, which only happens when using builtin DNS stub resolver. The previous internal lookup function lookup is split into lookup and goLookupIPOrder for iteration over a set of names: FQDN or absolute FQDN, with domain label suffixes in search list, without domain label suffixes, and for concurrent A and AAAA record queries. Fixes #11081. Change-Id: I9ff0640f69276e372d97e709b149ed5b153e8601 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10836Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
Rename test name from Http to HTTP, and fix some style nits. Change-Id: I00fe1cecd69ca2f50be86a76ec90031c2f921707 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12760Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
A further attempt to fix raiseproc on Solaris. Change-Id: I8d8000d6ccd0cd9f029ebe1f211b76ecee230cd0 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12771Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
I forgot that the libc raise function only sends the signal to the current thread. We need to actually use kill and getpid here, as we do on other systems. Change-Id: Iac34af822c93468bf68cab8879db3ee20891caaf Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12704Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
I'll rewrite this later. It's apparently dependent on scheduling order. The earlier fix in git rev 9d56c181 seems fine, though. Update #11894 Change-Id: I7c150918af4be079c262a5f2933ef4639cc535ef Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12731 Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
-
Paul Marks authored
I've also changed TestDialSerialAsyncSpuriousConnection for consistency, although it always computes a finalDeadline of zero. Note that #11225 is the root cause of the socket leak; this just hides it from the unit test by restoring the shorter timeout. Fixes #11878 Change-Id: Ie0037dd3bce6cc81d196765375489f8c61be74c2 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12712Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Paul Marks <pmarks@google.com>
-
Russ Cox authored
Fixes #11436. Change-Id: I5c4455e9b13b478838f23ac31e6343672dfc60af Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12143Reviewed-by: Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
David Crawshaw authored
Until cl/12721 and cl/12574, all standard library tests included runtime/cgo on darwin/arm64 by virtue of package os including it. Now that is no longer true, runtime/cgo needs to be added by the go tool just as it is for darwin/arm. (This installs the Mach exception handler used to properly handle EXC_BAD_ACCESS.) Fixes #11901 Change-Id: I991525f46eca5b0750b93595579ebc0ff10e47eb Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12723Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
The new Token API is meant to sit on the side of the Decoder, so that you only get the new code (and any latent bugs in it) if you are actively using the Token API. The unconditional use of dec.peek in dec.tokenPrepareForDecode violates that intention. Change tokenPrepareForDecode not to call dec.peek unless needed (because the Token API has advanced the state). This restores the old code path behavior, no peeking allowed. I checked by patching in the new tests from CL 12726 that this change suffices to "fix" the error handling bug in dec.peek. Obviously that bug should be fixed too, but the point is that with this CL, bugs in dec.peek do not affect plain use of Decode or Unmarshal. I also checked by putting a panic in dec.peek that the only tests that now invoke peek are: TestDecodeInStream ExampleDecoder_Token ExampleDecoder_Decode_stream and those tests all invoke dec.Token directly. Change-Id: I0b242d0cb54a9c830548644670dc5ab5ccef69f2 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12740Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Peter Waldschmidt <peter@waldschmidt.com>
-
Peter Waldschmidt authored
Fixes bug referenced in this thread on golang-dev: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/golang-dev/U4LSpMzL82c/discussion Change-Id: If01a2644863f9e5625dd2f95f9d344bda772e12c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12726Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Matthew Dempsky authored
Change-Id: I58453f7ed71eaca15dd3f501e4ae88d1fab19908 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12683Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
-
- 27 Jul, 2015 13 commits
-
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
From https://github.com/golang/go/issues/11745#issuecomment-123555313 this implements option (b), having the server pause slightly after sending the final response on a TCP connection when we're about to close it when we know there's a request body outstanding. This biases the client (which might not be Go) to prefer our response header over the request body write error. Updates #11745 Change-Id: I07cb0b74519d266c8049d9e0eb23a61304eedbf8 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12658Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
David Crawshaw authored
Seems like the simplest solution for 1.5. All the parts of the test suite I can run on my current device (for which my exception handler fix no longer works, apparently) pass without this code. I'll move it into x/mobile/app. Fixes #11884 Change-Id: I2da40c8c7b48a4c6970c4d709dd7c148a22e8727 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12721Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently we enter mark 2 by first flushing all existing gcWork caches and then setting gcBlackenPromptly, which disables further gcWork caching. However, if a worker or assist pulls a work buffer in to its gcWork cache after that cache has been flushed but before caching is disabled, that work may remain in that cache until mark termination. If that work represents a heap bottleneck (e.g., a single pointer that is the only way to reach a large amount of the heap), this can force mark termination to do a large amount of work, resulting in a long STW. Fix this by reversing the order of these steps: first disable caching, then flush all existing caches. Rick Hudson <rlh> did the hard work of tracking this down. This CL combined with CL 12672 and CL 12646 distills the critical parts of his fix from CL 12539. Fixes #11694. Change-Id: Ib10d0a21e3f6170a80727d0286f9990df049fed2 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12688Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently the GC coordinator enables GC assists at the same time it enables background mark workers, after the concurrent scan phase is done. However, this means a rapidly allocating mutator has the entire scan phase during which to allocate beyond the heap trigger and potentially beyond the heap goal with no back-pressure from assists. This prevents the feedback system that's supposed to keep the heap size under the heap goal from doing its job. Fix this by enabling mutator assists during the scan phase. This is safe because the write barrier is already enabled and globally acknowledged at this point. There's still a very small window between when the heap size reaches the heap trigger and when the GC coordinator is able to stop the world during which the mutator can allocate unabated. This allows *very* rapidly allocator mutators like TestTraceStress to still occasionally exceed the heap goal by a small amount (~20 MB at most for TestTraceStress). However, this seems like a corner case. Fixes #11677. Change-Id: I0f80d949ec82341cd31ca1604a626efb7295a819 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12674Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently we hand-code a set of phases when draining is allowed. However, this set of phases is conservative. The critical invariant is simply that the write barrier must be enabled if we're draining. Shortly we're going to enable mutator assists during the scan phase, which means we may drain during the scan phase. In preparation, this commit generalizes these assertions to check the fundamental condition that the write barrier is enabled, rather than checking that we're in any particular phase. Change-Id: I0e1bec1ca823d4a697a0831ec4c50f5dd3f2a893 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12673Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently we clear both the mark 1 and mark 2 signals at the beginning of concurrent mark. If either if these is clear, it acts as a signal to the scheduler that it should start background workers. However, this means that in the interim *between* mark 1 and mark 2, the scheduler basically loops starting up new workers only to have them return with nothing to do. In addition to harming performance and delaying mutator work, this approach has a race where workers started for mark 1 can mistakenly signal mark 2, causing it to complete prematurely. This approach also interferes with starting assists earlier to fix #11677. Fix this by initially setting both mark 1 and mark 2 to "signaled". The scheduler will not start background mark workers, though assists can still run. When we're ready to enter mark 1, we clear the mark 1 signal and wait for it. Then, when we're ready to enter mark 2, we clear the mark 2 signal and wait for it. This structure also lets us deal cleanly with the situation where all work is drained *prior* to the mark 2 wait, meaning that there may be no workers to signal completion. Currently we deal with this using a racy (and possibly incorrect) check for work in the coordinator itself to skip the mark 2 wait if there's no work. This change makes the coordinator unconditionally wait for mark completion and makes the scheduler itself signal completion by slightly extending the logic it already has to determine that there's no work and hence no use in starting a new worker. This is a prerequisite to fixing the remaining component of #11677, which will require enabling assists during the scan phase. However, we don't want to enable background workers until the mark phase because they will compete with the scan. This change lets us use bgMark1 and bgMark2 to indicate when it's okay to start background workers independent of assists. This is also a prerequisite to fixing #11694. It significantly reduces the occurrence of long mark termination pauses in #11694 (from 64 out of 1000 to 2 out of 1000 in one experiment). Coincidentally, this also reduces the final heap size (and hence run time) of TestTraceStress from ~100 MB and ~1.9 seconds to ~14 MB and ~0.4 seconds because it significantly shortens concurrent mark duration. Rick Hudson <rlh> did the hard work of tracking this down. Change-Id: I12ea9ee2db9a0ae9d3a90dde4944a75fcf408f4c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12672Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently, there are three ways to satisfy a GC assist: 1) the mutator steals credit from background GC, 2) the mutator actually does GC work, and 3) there is no more work available. 3 was never really intended as a way to satisfy an assist, and it causes problems: there are periods when it's expected that the GC won't have any work, such as when transitioning from mark 1 to mark 2 and from mark 2 to mark termination. During these periods, there's no back-pressure on rapidly allocating mutators, which lets them race ahead of the heap goal. For example, test/init1.go and the runtime/trace test both have small reachable heaps and contain loops that rapidly allocate large garbage byte slices. This bug lets these tests exceed the heap goal by several orders of magnitude. Fix this by forcing the assist (and hence the allocation) to block until it can satisfy its debt via either 1 or 2, or the GC cycle terminates. This fixes one the causes of #11677. It's still possible to overshoot the GC heap goal, but with this change the overshoot is almost exactly by the amount of allocation that happens during the concurrent scan phase, between when the heap passes the GC trigger and when the GC enables assists. Change-Id: I5ef4edcb0d2e13a1e432e66e8245f2bd9f8995be Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12671Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently it's possible for the GC assist to signal completion of the mark phase, which puts the GC coordinator goroutine on the current P's run queue, and then return to mutator code that delays until the next forced preemption before actually yielding control to the GC coordinator, dragging out completion of the mark phase. This delay can be further exacerbated if the mutator makes other goroutines runnable before yielding control, since this will push the GC coordinator on the back of the P's run queue. To fix this, this adds a Gosched to the assist if it completed the mark phase. This immediately and directly yields control to the GC coordinator. This already happens implicitly in the background mark workers because they park immediately after completing the mark. This is one of the reasons completion of the mark phase is being dragged out and allowing the mutator to allocate without assisting, leading to the large heap goal overshoot in issue #11677. This is also a prerequisite to making the assist block when it can't pay off its debt. Change-Id: I586adfbecb3ca042a37966752c1dc757f5c7fc78 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12670Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently it's possible to perform GC work on a system stack or when locks are held if there's an allocation that triggers an assist. This is generally a bad idea because of the fragility of these contexts, and it's incompatible with two changes we're about to make: one is to yield after signaling mark completion (which we can't do from a non-preemptible context) and the other is to make assists block if there's no other way for them to pay off the assist debt. This commit simply skips the assist if it's called from a non-preemptible context. The allocation will still count toward the assist debt, so it will be paid off by a later assist. There should be little allocation from non-preemptible contexts, so this shouldn't harm the overall assist mechanism. Change-Id: I7bf0e6c73e659fe6b52f27437abf39d76b245c79 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12649Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
When notetsleep_internal is called from notetsleepg, notetsleepg has just given up the P, so write barriers are not allowed in notetsleep_internal. Change-Id: I1b214fa388b1ea05b8ce2dcfe1c0074c0a3c8870 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12647Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently fractional and idle mark workers dispose of their gcWork cache during mark 2 after incrementing work.nwait and after checking whether there are any workers or any work available. This creates a window for two races: 1) If the only remaining work is in this worker's gcWork cache, it will see that there are no more workers and no more work on the global lists (since it has not yet flushed its own cache) and prematurely signal mark 2 completion. 2) After this worker has incremented work.nwait but before it has flushed its cache, another worker may observe that there are no more workers and no more work and prematurely signal mark 2 completion. We can fix both of these by simply moving the cache flush above the increment of nwait and the test of the completion condition. This is probably contributing to #11694, though this alone is not enough to fix it. Change-Id: Idcf9656e5c460c5ea0d23c19c6c51e951f7716c3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12646Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
GC assists are supposed to steal at most the amount of background GC credit available so that background GC credit doesn't go negative. However, they are instead stealing the *total* amount of their debt but only claiming up to the amount of credit that was available. This results in draining the background GC credit pool too quickly, which results in unnecessary assist work. The fix is trivial: steal the amount of work we meant to steal (which is already computed). Change-Id: I837fe60ed515ba91c6baf363248069734a7895ef Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12643Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
CL https://golang.org/cl/12470 has reportedly fixed the problems that the misc/cgo/testsovar test encountered on darwin and netbsd. Let's actually run the test. Update #10360. Update #11654. Change-Id: I4cdd27a8ec8713620e0135780a03f63cfcc538d0 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12702Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-