-
Sven Eckelmann authored
The relayfs was changed to use per CPU constructs to handle the rchan buffers. But the users of the rchan buffers in other parts of the kernel were not modified. This caused crashes like BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00003a5198a0b910 IP: [<ffffffffa973cb3a>] ath_cmn_process_fft+0xea/0x610 PGD 0 [ 179.522449] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.9.0-rc5 #1 [...] Call Trace: <IRQ> [ 179.656426] [<ffffffffa9704373>] ? ath_rx_tasklet+0x2f3/0xd10 [<ffffffffa9702106>] ? ath9k_tasklet+0x1b6/0x230 [<ffffffffa90dcbd1>] ? tasklet_action+0xf1/0x100 [<ffffffffa9a3cb3f>] ? __do_softirq+0xef/0x284 [<ffffffffa90dd22e>] ? irq_exit+0xae/0xb0 [<ffffffffa9a3c89f>] ? do_IRQ+0x4f/0xd0 [<ffffffffa9a3aa42>] ? common_interrupt+0x82/0x82 <EOI> [ 179.703152] [<ffffffffa9a39c1d>] ? poll_idle+0x2d/0x57 [<ffffffffa908c845>] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 [<ffffffffa97bc8d6>] ? cpuidle_enter_state+0xf6/0x2d0 [<ffffffffa911988e>] ? cpu_startup_entry+0x14e/0x230 [<ffffffffaa3cdf70>] ? start_kernel+0x461/0x481 [<ffffffffaa3cd120>] ? early_idt_handler_array+0x120/0x120 [<ffffffffaa3cd413>] ? x86_64_start_kernel+0x14c/0x170 Code: 31 db 41 be ff ff ff ff 4c 8b 26 48 8b 6e 08 49 8b 84 24 60 05 00 00 48 8b 00 0f b7 40 04 66 89 44 24 48 eb 11 48 8b 55 40 48 98 <48> 8b 3c c2 e8 ad a0 a4 ff 01 c3 41 8d 56 01 be 00 02 00 00 48 RIP [<ffffffffa973cb3a>] ath_cmn_process_fft+0xea/0x610 RSP <ffff9b43e7003d20> CR2: 00003a5198a0b910 Fixes: 017c59c0 ("relay: Use per CPU constructs for the relay channel buffer pointers") Cc: Akash Goel <akash.goel@intel.com> Cc: Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com> Reported-by: Mathias Kretschmer <mathias.kretschmer@fit.fraunhofer.de> Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
07460b92