• Dipankar Sarma's avatar
    [PATCH] RCU helper patchset 1/2 · 0ec69870
    Dipankar Sarma authored
    This first RCU helper patch adds a read_barrier_depends() primitive
    to all archs which is NOP for archs that doesn't require an rmb()
    for data dependent reads when writes are ordered using a wmb().
    In reality, only alpha requires an rmb(), the rest are NOPs.
    It is likely to be necessary in most situations that would use RCU.
    Please apply.
    
     Description :
    
    Sometime ago, during a discussion on lock-free lookups, it was
    agreed that an additional memory barrier interface,
    read_barrier_depends() that is lighter than an rmb(),
    is necessary to make sure that data-dependent reads are not
    re-ordered over this barrier. For many processors, data-dependency
    enforces order, so this interface is a NOP, but for those that don't
    (like alpha), it can be a rmb().
    
    For example, the following code would force ordering (the initial
    value of "a" is zero, "b" is one, and "p" is "&a"):
    
        CPU 0                           CPU 1
    
        b = 2;
        memory_barrier();
        p = &b;                         q = p;
                                        read_barrier_depends();
                                        d = *q;
    
    because the read of "*q" depends on the read of "p" and these
    two reads should be separated by a read_barrier_depends().  However,
    the following code, with the same initial values for "a" and "b":
    
        CPU 0                           CPU 1
    
        a = 2;
        memory_barrier();
        b = 3;                          y = b;
                                        read_barrier_depends();
                                        x = a;
    
    does not enforce ordering, since there is no data dependency between
    the read of "a" and the read of "b".  Therefore, on some CPUs, such
    as Alpha, "y" could be set to 3 and "x" to 0.  rmb()
    needs to be used here, not read_barrier_depends().
    
    The original discussion can be found at -
    http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=100259422200002&r=1&w=2
    
    Explanation of the need for read_barrier_depends()
    can be found at http://lse.sf.net/locking/wmbdd.html
    0ec69870
system.h 5.67 KB